Effect of supplementing grazing Arsi-Bale sheep with molasses-urea feed block on weight gain and economic return under farmers management condition

T. Geleta, T. Negesse, G. Abebe, A. Goetsch
{"title":"Effect of supplementing grazing Arsi-Bale sheep with molasses-urea feed block on weight gain and economic return under farmers management condition","authors":"T. Geleta, T. Negesse, G. Abebe, A. Goetsch","doi":"10.5897/JCAB11.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sheep fattening with Molasses-urea feed block (MUB) was undertaken in Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha District at Aneno and Arba villages for 87 days during both dry (from 22 March to 17 June) and during wet season (from 19 August to 10 November, 2009). A study was conducted to determine the performance and profitability obtained from MUB supplemented grazing sheep. Molasses, urea, wheat bran, finely ground haricot bean haulm, salt, and bindinder (cement and termite mould) were used as ingredients to produce three different MUBs; Treatment two (T2), Treatment three (T3) and Treatment four (T4) with 17.72, 20.96 and 24.6% CP, respectively. Six sheep were randomly allotted to each of T1, T2, T3 and T4 during both dry and wet seasons at each village. Sheep in T4 had higher overall average daily weight gain (ADWG) (74.8 ± 11.13 g/head/day followed by T2, T3 and T1 (72.88 ± 9.27, 58.5 ± 12.98 and 33.67 ± 3.03) g/head/day, respectively. Over all total body weight gain (TBWG) of T4 was higher (6.26 ± 0.53) kg, followed by T2, T3 and T1 (6.13 ± 0.46, 4.92 ± 0.64 and 2.83 ± 0.39) kg, respectively. Differences (P 0.05). ADWG (67.96 ± 10.31) g/head/day and TBWG (5.91 ± 0.87) kg of sheep at Aneno village was significantly (P<0.05) higher than the ADWG (51.79 ± 9.41) g/head /day and TBWG (4.51 ± 0.75) kg of sheep at Arba village. Significant difference (P<0.05) in ADWG and TBWG was observed between seasons with the higher gain during wet season ( 67.33 ± 11.43) g/head/day growth rate and 5.86 ± 0.43 kg total weight gain as compared to dry season ( 52.07 ± 8.3) g/head/day growth rate and 4.53 ± 0.39 kg total weight gain. The interaction of season by village was not significantly influenced both ADWG and TBWG of sheep. Marginal rate of return of T2 is higher (123.46) followed by T3.77.16) and T4 (65.64). From the biological and economic data analysis, we can conclude and recommend that MUB with 17.72% CP could be used as supplement for sheep fattening in mid rift valley of Ethiopia. \n \n   \n \n Key words: Feed block, crude protein, weight gain, growth rate, return.","PeriodicalId":15216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cell and Animal Biology","volume":"83 6 1","pages":"125-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cell and Animal Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/JCAB11.030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Sheep fattening with Molasses-urea feed block (MUB) was undertaken in Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha District at Aneno and Arba villages for 87 days during both dry (from 22 March to 17 June) and during wet season (from 19 August to 10 November, 2009). A study was conducted to determine the performance and profitability obtained from MUB supplemented grazing sheep. Molasses, urea, wheat bran, finely ground haricot bean haulm, salt, and bindinder (cement and termite mould) were used as ingredients to produce three different MUBs; Treatment two (T2), Treatment three (T3) and Treatment four (T4) with 17.72, 20.96 and 24.6% CP, respectively. Six sheep were randomly allotted to each of T1, T2, T3 and T4 during both dry and wet seasons at each village. Sheep in T4 had higher overall average daily weight gain (ADWG) (74.8 ± 11.13 g/head/day followed by T2, T3 and T1 (72.88 ± 9.27, 58.5 ± 12.98 and 33.67 ± 3.03) g/head/day, respectively. Over all total body weight gain (TBWG) of T4 was higher (6.26 ± 0.53) kg, followed by T2, T3 and T1 (6.13 ± 0.46, 4.92 ± 0.64 and 2.83 ± 0.39) kg, respectively. Differences (P 0.05). ADWG (67.96 ± 10.31) g/head/day and TBWG (5.91 ± 0.87) kg of sheep at Aneno village was significantly (P<0.05) higher than the ADWG (51.79 ± 9.41) g/head /day and TBWG (4.51 ± 0.75) kg of sheep at Arba village. Significant difference (P<0.05) in ADWG and TBWG was observed between seasons with the higher gain during wet season ( 67.33 ± 11.43) g/head/day growth rate and 5.86 ± 0.43 kg total weight gain as compared to dry season ( 52.07 ± 8.3) g/head/day growth rate and 4.53 ± 0.39 kg total weight gain. The interaction of season by village was not significantly influenced both ADWG and TBWG of sheep. Marginal rate of return of T2 is higher (123.46) followed by T3.77.16) and T4 (65.64). From the biological and economic data analysis, we can conclude and recommend that MUB with 17.72% CP could be used as supplement for sheep fattening in mid rift valley of Ethiopia.   Key words: Feed block, crude protein, weight gain, growth rate, return.
农家经营条件下给放牧阿尔西-贝尔羊补充糖蜜-尿素料块对增重和经济效益的影响
在Adami Tulu Jido Kombolcha区的Aneno和Arba村,在旱季(2009年3月22日至6月17日)和雨季(2009年8月19日至11月10日)用糖蜜-尿素饲料块(MUB)对绵羊进行了87天的育肥。本研究旨在确定MUB补充放牧羊的生产性能和盈利能力。以糖蜜、尿素、麦麸、细碎的蚕豆、盐和粘合剂(水泥和白蚁霉菌)为原料,制备了三种不同的mub;处理2 (T2)、处理3 (T3)和处理4 (T4) CP分别为17.72、20.96和24.6%。每个村在干季和湿季随机分配6只羊,分别为T1、T2、T3和T4。T4组绵羊的总体平均日增重(ADWG)最高(74.8±11.13 g/头/天),其次是T2、T3和T1组(72.88±9.27、58.5±12.98和33.67±3.03)g/头/天。总增重(TBWG)以T4组最高(6.26±0.53)kg,其次为T2、T3和T1组(分别为6.13±0.46、4.92±0.64和2.83±0.39)kg。差异(p0.05)。阿内诺村的ADWG(67.96±10.31)g/头/天,TBWG(5.91±0.87)kg显著高于阿尔巴村的ADWG(51.79±9.41)g/头/天,TBWG(4.51±0.75)kg。季间ADWG和TBWG差异显著(P<0.05),其中湿季增重(67.33±11.43)g/头/天,总增重5.86±0.43 kg)高于旱季(52.07±8.3)g/头/天,总增重4.53±0.39 kg)。季节与村庄的交互作用对绵羊ADWG和TBWG均无显著影响。T2的边际收益率较高(123.46),其次为T3.77.16, T4为65.64。从生物学和经济学的角度分析,可以得出并推荐17.72% CP的MUB作为埃塞俄比亚中部裂谷地区绵羊肥育的补充饲料。关键词:饲料块,粗蛋白质,增重,生长率,收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信