Mozart and the Mediation of Childhood Adeline Mueller Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2021 pp. xiii + 287, ISBN 978 0 226 62966 7

IF 0.1 2区 艺术学 N/A MUSIC
Tyler Bickford
{"title":"Mozart and the Mediation of Childhood Adeline Mueller Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2021 pp. xiii + 287, ISBN 978 0 226 62966 7","authors":"Tyler Bickford","doi":"10.1017/S1478570623000040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Childhood is new. While every society certainly organizes itself in some form or another around age, the particular values that contemporary European and North American societies place on childhood and children are relatively recent and idiosyncratic. These include the valorization of childhood innocence (which might as easily be called naivety or even ignorance); the association of children with nature, in the sense both of animals and of essences; the expectation that children are vulnerable and must be sheltered, not only from work but also from participation in public life more generally; and the naturalization of expectations about ‘normal’ and universal trajectories of human development that have adult rationality as their end-point. In fact, as scholars in the maturing field of childhood studies often argue, the intensification of ideological and cultural investments in children and childhood was and is a defining feature of modernity. Since the early 1990s, such scholars – primarily in history, sociology, anthropology and literature – have traced how ideas about children and childhood developed in fields ranging from politics, law, philosophy and science to literature. The study of music and childhood has developed over a similar period in fits and starts, initially through the work of music-education scholars adopting ethnomusicological perspectives and then through individual efforts by music historians and ethnomusicologists, who have slowly sought each other out and begun to consolidate a subfield. I give this background because Adeline Mueller’s new book, Mozart and the Mediation of Childhood, marks a major milestone. It makes a compelling case for the centrality of music to the historical study of childhood, and it shows clearly how rethinking familiar music history through the lens of childhood can reveal striking new insights. Mueller demonstrates that music was not simply one more domain that was swept along by the social, political and ideological revolutions at the turn of the nineteenth century, but in fact that music was at the centre of the emergence of what we now recognize as the concept of the modern child. Mozart and the Mediation of Childhood is a nuanced, rigorous and thoughtful exploration of a broad range of fields in which Mozart – as a public figure and as an individual actor – was central to specific pivotal transformations in the European understanding of children and childhood. Mueller makes this case very effectively in her first chapter, which argues that modern childhood was understood very early on as a public identity, forged in and through the circulation of texts. This is an important claim, in part because modern ideologies of the public sphere emphasized rationality and the sublimation of individual particularity into the abstractions of textual circulation – qualities that were quite explicitly associated with maturity and adulthood (in addition, of course, to racial and gender hierarchies). So while Mueller shows that, as a child, Mozart was a public spectacle who influenced ideas about what childhood is or could be, her argument is much more significant than simply an account of representation and changing ideas about capabilities (that is, since this one child can do X, perhaps other children can as well). Rather, for Mueller,","PeriodicalId":11521,"journal":{"name":"Eighteenth Century Music","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eighteenth Century Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478570623000040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Childhood is new. While every society certainly organizes itself in some form or another around age, the particular values that contemporary European and North American societies place on childhood and children are relatively recent and idiosyncratic. These include the valorization of childhood innocence (which might as easily be called naivety or even ignorance); the association of children with nature, in the sense both of animals and of essences; the expectation that children are vulnerable and must be sheltered, not only from work but also from participation in public life more generally; and the naturalization of expectations about ‘normal’ and universal trajectories of human development that have adult rationality as their end-point. In fact, as scholars in the maturing field of childhood studies often argue, the intensification of ideological and cultural investments in children and childhood was and is a defining feature of modernity. Since the early 1990s, such scholars – primarily in history, sociology, anthropology and literature – have traced how ideas about children and childhood developed in fields ranging from politics, law, philosophy and science to literature. The study of music and childhood has developed over a similar period in fits and starts, initially through the work of music-education scholars adopting ethnomusicological perspectives and then through individual efforts by music historians and ethnomusicologists, who have slowly sought each other out and begun to consolidate a subfield. I give this background because Adeline Mueller’s new book, Mozart and the Mediation of Childhood, marks a major milestone. It makes a compelling case for the centrality of music to the historical study of childhood, and it shows clearly how rethinking familiar music history through the lens of childhood can reveal striking new insights. Mueller demonstrates that music was not simply one more domain that was swept along by the social, political and ideological revolutions at the turn of the nineteenth century, but in fact that music was at the centre of the emergence of what we now recognize as the concept of the modern child. Mozart and the Mediation of Childhood is a nuanced, rigorous and thoughtful exploration of a broad range of fields in which Mozart – as a public figure and as an individual actor – was central to specific pivotal transformations in the European understanding of children and childhood. Mueller makes this case very effectively in her first chapter, which argues that modern childhood was understood very early on as a public identity, forged in and through the circulation of texts. This is an important claim, in part because modern ideologies of the public sphere emphasized rationality and the sublimation of individual particularity into the abstractions of textual circulation – qualities that were quite explicitly associated with maturity and adulthood (in addition, of course, to racial and gender hierarchies). So while Mueller shows that, as a child, Mozart was a public spectacle who influenced ideas about what childhood is or could be, her argument is much more significant than simply an account of representation and changing ideas about capabilities (that is, since this one child can do X, perhaps other children can as well). Rather, for Mueller,
莫扎特和童年的调解阿德琳·穆勒芝加哥:芝加哥大学出版社,2021 pp. xiii + 287, ISBN 978 0 226 62966 7
童年是新的。虽然每个社会都以某种形式或另一种形式围绕年龄进行组织,但当代欧洲和北美社会对童年和儿童的特殊价值观是相对较新的和特殊的。其中包括对童年纯真的推崇(这很容易被称为天真,甚至无知);儿童与自然的联系,在动物和本质的意义上;期望儿童易受伤害,必须得到庇护,不仅不让他们工作,而且不让他们更广泛地参与公共生活;以及对以成人理性为终点的“正常”和普遍的人类发展轨迹的期望的归化。事实上,正如成熟的儿童研究领域的学者经常争辩的那样,对儿童和儿童的意识形态和文化投资的加强过去是,现在也是现代性的一个决定性特征。自20世纪90年代初以来,这些主要来自历史、社会学、人类学和文学领域的学者追踪了从政治、法律、哲学、科学到文学等领域关于儿童和童年的观念是如何发展的。音乐和儿童的研究也经历了一个类似的时期,断断续续地发展起来,最初是通过音乐教育学者采用民族音乐学观点的工作,然后是通过音乐历史学家和民族音乐学家的个人努力,他们慢慢地相互寻找并开始巩固一个分支领域。我给出这个背景是因为艾德琳·穆勒的新书《莫扎特与童年的调解》标志着一个重要的里程碑。它为音乐在童年历史研究中的中心地位提供了一个令人信服的案例,它清楚地表明,通过童年的镜头重新思考熟悉的音乐史可以揭示惊人的新见解。穆勒证明了音乐不仅仅是19世纪初被社会、政治和意识形态革命席卷的又一个领域,事实上,音乐是我们现在所认识的现代儿童概念出现的核心。莫扎特和童年的调解是一个细致、严谨和深思熟虑的探索,在广泛的领域中,莫扎特作为一个公众人物和个人演员,在欧洲对儿童和童年的理解中发挥了关键作用。穆勒在她的第一章中非常有效地阐述了这一点,她认为,现代童年很早就被理解为一种公共身份,在文本的流通中形成并通过文本的流通形成。这是一个重要的主张,部分原因是公共领域的现代意识形态强调理性,并将个人的特殊性升华为文本循环的抽象——这些品质与成熟和成年(当然,除了种族和性别等级之外)非常明确地联系在一起。因此,尽管穆勒表明,莫扎特作为一个孩子,是一个影响童年是什么或可能是什么的公众人物,但她的论点比简单地描述表征和改变关于能力的观念(也就是说,既然这个孩子能做X,也许其他孩子也能)更有意义。相反,对穆勒来说,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信