Re: Public Consultation Document: Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digitalisation of the Economy (13 February-6 March, 2019)

IF 0.9 Q2 LAW
Dhruv Sanghavi, Julia Uchańska, Pál Sóvág
{"title":"Re: Public Consultation Document: Addressing the Tax Challenges of the Digitalisation of the Economy (13 February-6 March, 2019)","authors":"Dhruv Sanghavi, Julia Uchańska, Pál Sóvág","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3349119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The need for a global response to the challenges presented by the digitalisation of the economy has been magnified due to various unilateral \"interim\" measures that countries have begun to adopt. This is because these unilateral measures could fall outside the scope of tax treaties, and result in harmful double taxation. The OECD's public consultation document proposes to design such a global response by amending the existing nexus and profit allocation rules. \n \nThe terms “nexus rules” and “profit allocation” can be viewed from two perspectives: a. tax claims made by countries under their internal tax laws; and b. restrictions imposed on these claims by tax treaties. It is generally acknowledged that countries, in the exercise of their sovereignty, are free to claim taxing rights in any manner as they may deem fit, although their ability to enforce them may be limited in the case of cross-border scenarios. Given the abundance of ways in which countries may seek to tax their residents and non-residents’ income (whether it emanates from their participation in the digital economy or otherwise), the ends of harmonisation and certainty seem best served through the medium of income tax treaties. \n \nThis contribution reviews the proposals made in the public consultation document from the perspective of tax treaties.","PeriodicalId":54058,"journal":{"name":"EJournal of Tax Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJournal of Tax Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3349119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The need for a global response to the challenges presented by the digitalisation of the economy has been magnified due to various unilateral "interim" measures that countries have begun to adopt. This is because these unilateral measures could fall outside the scope of tax treaties, and result in harmful double taxation. The OECD's public consultation document proposes to design such a global response by amending the existing nexus and profit allocation rules. The terms “nexus rules” and “profit allocation” can be viewed from two perspectives: a. tax claims made by countries under their internal tax laws; and b. restrictions imposed on these claims by tax treaties. It is generally acknowledged that countries, in the exercise of their sovereignty, are free to claim taxing rights in any manner as they may deem fit, although their ability to enforce them may be limited in the case of cross-border scenarios. Given the abundance of ways in which countries may seek to tax their residents and non-residents’ income (whether it emanates from their participation in the digital economy or otherwise), the ends of harmonisation and certainty seem best served through the medium of income tax treaties. This contribution reviews the proposals made in the public consultation document from the perspective of tax treaties.
回复:公众谘询文件:应对经济数码化带来的税务挑战(2019年2月13日至3月6日)
由于各国开始采取各种单边“临时”措施,全球应对经济数字化带来的挑战的必要性被放大了。这是因为这些单边措施可能超出税收协定的范围,并导致有害的双重征税。经合组织的公众咨询文件建议,通过修改现有的联系和利润分配规则,设计出这样一种全球回应。“联系规则”和“利润分配”这两个术语可以从两个角度来看待:a.各国根据其国内税法提出的税收主张;b.税收协定对这些索赔施加的限制。人们普遍承认,各国在行使其主权时,可以自由地以它们认为合适的任何方式要求征税权,尽管它们在跨国界情况下执行这些权利的能力可能受到限制。考虑到各国可能寻求对其居民和非居民收入征税的多种方式(无论是来自他们参与数字经济还是其他方式),协调和确定性的目的似乎最好通过所得税协定来实现。这篇文章从税收协定的角度审查了公众咨询文件中提出的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信