The Prevalence of Impacted Third Molar, Impaction Angulation, and Impaction Depth in Patients Visiting Dental Clinics and Private Offices in Ghaemshahr, Iran, in 2016

Seyed Mehdi Taghain, A. Maboudi, Mahmoud Goli, A. Sameie, L. Sadri
{"title":"The Prevalence of Impacted Third Molar, Impaction Angulation, and Impaction Depth in Patients Visiting Dental Clinics and Private Offices in Ghaemshahr, Iran, in 2016","authors":"Seyed Mehdi Taghain, A. Maboudi, Mahmoud Goli, A. Sameie, L. Sadri","doi":"10.52547/rabms.8.2.83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Aims : The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of impacted third molar as well as impaction angulation and depth. Materials & Methods : In this cross-sectional descriptive study, 261 panoramic radiographs belonging to patients visiting dental clinics and offices in Ghaemshahr, Iran, were evaluated and the presence of impacted wisdom teeth was examined. Moreover, the angulation of impacted teeth, impaction depth, and the relationship of the tooth to the mandibular ramus were recorded. The data were recorded, collected, and statistically analyzed in SPSS 22 using the non-parametric chi-square test. p <0.05 was considered significant. Results : Of the 261 patients entering the study, 52 (17.69%) had at least one impacted tooth. Of the total number of patients with impacted teeth, 31 were women (mean prevalence of 19.87% of the total population of women) and 21 were men (15.22% of the total population of men), showing no significant difference (p=0.29). In terms of impaction depth based on Pell and Gregory’ classification, Class C impaction depth was the most prevalent in the maxilla, while Class A was the most prevalent in the mandible. The most prevalent impaction in terms of angulation in relation to the second molar was vertical in the maxilla and vertical and mesioangular in the mandible. Conclusion : Based on results, the prevalence of impacted wisdom teeth in patients was 17.69%. This may not be a striking amount, but it is still of significance since the possible complications of impacted teeth are costly and problematic.","PeriodicalId":16970,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Applied and Basic Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Applied and Basic Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/rabms.8.2.83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Aims : The present study aimed to determine the prevalence of impacted third molar as well as impaction angulation and depth. Materials & Methods : In this cross-sectional descriptive study, 261 panoramic radiographs belonging to patients visiting dental clinics and offices in Ghaemshahr, Iran, were evaluated and the presence of impacted wisdom teeth was examined. Moreover, the angulation of impacted teeth, impaction depth, and the relationship of the tooth to the mandibular ramus were recorded. The data were recorded, collected, and statistically analyzed in SPSS 22 using the non-parametric chi-square test. p <0.05 was considered significant. Results : Of the 261 patients entering the study, 52 (17.69%) had at least one impacted tooth. Of the total number of patients with impacted teeth, 31 were women (mean prevalence of 19.87% of the total population of women) and 21 were men (15.22% of the total population of men), showing no significant difference (p=0.29). In terms of impaction depth based on Pell and Gregory’ classification, Class C impaction depth was the most prevalent in the maxilla, while Class A was the most prevalent in the mandible. The most prevalent impaction in terms of angulation in relation to the second molar was vertical in the maxilla and vertical and mesioangular in the mandible. Conclusion : Based on results, the prevalence of impacted wisdom teeth in patients was 17.69%. This may not be a striking amount, but it is still of significance since the possible complications of impacted teeth are costly and problematic.
2016年在伊朗Ghaemshahr牙科诊所和私人诊所就诊的患者中第三磨牙嵌塞、嵌塞角度和嵌塞深度的患病率
背景与目的:本研究的目的是确定第三磨牙的流行情况以及嵌塞角度和深度。材料与方法:在这项横断面描述性研究中,对伊朗Ghaemshahr牙科诊所和办公室就诊的261名患者的全景x线片进行了评估,并检查了阻生智齿的存在。此外,还记录了阻生牙的角度、嵌塞深度以及与下颌支的关系。数据记录、收集,并在SPSS 22中使用非参数卡方检验进行统计分析。P <0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:261例患者中,52例(17.69%)至少有一颗阻生牙。其中女性31例(平均占女性总人数的19.87%),男性21例(占男性总人数的15.22%),差异无统计学意义(p=0.29)。在Pell和Gregory的嵌塞深度分类中,C类嵌塞深度在上颌骨最常见,A类嵌塞深度在下颌骨最常见。就第二磨牙的角度而言最常见的嵌塞是上颌骨的垂直嵌塞下颌骨的垂直嵌塞和中角嵌塞。结论:本组患者阻生智齿患病率为17.69%。这可能不是一个惊人的数字,但它仍然是重要的,因为阻生牙齿可能的并发症是昂贵的和有问题的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信