Science Process Skills in Science Education of Developed and Developing Countries: Literature Review

Mercy Mushani
{"title":"Science Process Skills in Science Education of Developed and Developing Countries: Literature Review","authors":"Mercy Mushani","doi":"10.15294/USEJ.V10I1.42153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this literature review is to analyze and evaluate the research studies conducted on science process skills (SPS) in science education in the context of developed and developing countries. A follow-up to this study will investigate teacher facilitation of SPS development at Primary School level in Zambia. The method carried out in this study is a literature review. It involved analyzing and synthesizing some research work already conducted globally, considering the educational significance of SPS. The search was limited to peer-reviewed journal articles written in English and whose full papers were available on the databases. The articles were published between 1987 and 2018 because SPS’s teaching and learning has been prevalent in research since the early 1980s. In total, 198 articles were found as a result of the initial search. The researcher screened abstracts of these articles to judge their relevance, and from this screening process of abstracts, 31 papers have been included for review. Reviewed study trends on SPS development conducted from developed and developing countries focusing on three vantage points: science curriculum, teacher education and the 21st Century Learning. Based on the findings, more research studies on SPS in science education are carried out in developed countries than developing ones. The review findings indicate uneven inclusion of SPS in the science curriculum documents and the curriculum implementation at all science education levels. Lastly, results display few studies on SPS education regarding 21st Century Learning conducted in developed and developing countries. Concerned education bodies must take appropriate and reasonable exploits on teacher training of SPS education and the balanced inclusion of SPS in the science curriculum and its implementation into consideration. SPS still champions the development of other skills individuals are supposed to possess in this 21st-century era. Hence, SPS education in science education remains a need for both developed and developing countries.","PeriodicalId":30735,"journal":{"name":"USEJ Unnes Science Education Journal","volume":"199 1","pages":"12-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"USEJ Unnes Science Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/USEJ.V10I1.42153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this literature review is to analyze and evaluate the research studies conducted on science process skills (SPS) in science education in the context of developed and developing countries. A follow-up to this study will investigate teacher facilitation of SPS development at Primary School level in Zambia. The method carried out in this study is a literature review. It involved analyzing and synthesizing some research work already conducted globally, considering the educational significance of SPS. The search was limited to peer-reviewed journal articles written in English and whose full papers were available on the databases. The articles were published between 1987 and 2018 because SPS’s teaching and learning has been prevalent in research since the early 1980s. In total, 198 articles were found as a result of the initial search. The researcher screened abstracts of these articles to judge their relevance, and from this screening process of abstracts, 31 papers have been included for review. Reviewed study trends on SPS development conducted from developed and developing countries focusing on three vantage points: science curriculum, teacher education and the 21st Century Learning. Based on the findings, more research studies on SPS in science education are carried out in developed countries than developing ones. The review findings indicate uneven inclusion of SPS in the science curriculum documents and the curriculum implementation at all science education levels. Lastly, results display few studies on SPS education regarding 21st Century Learning conducted in developed and developing countries. Concerned education bodies must take appropriate and reasonable exploits on teacher training of SPS education and the balanced inclusion of SPS in the science curriculum and its implementation into consideration. SPS still champions the development of other skills individuals are supposed to possess in this 21st-century era. Hence, SPS education in science education remains a need for both developed and developing countries.
发达国家和发展中国家科学教育中的科学过程技能:文献综述
本文献综述的目的是分析和评价发达国家和发展中国家在科学教育中对科学过程技能(SPS)进行的研究。本研究的后续研究将调查赞比亚小学教师促进SPS发展的情况。本研究采用的方法是文献综述。考虑到SPS的教育意义,分析和综合了全球已经开展的一些研究工作。搜索仅限于同行评议的英文期刊文章,这些文章的全文可以在数据库中找到。这些文章发表于1987年至2018年之间,因为自20世纪80年代初以来,SPS的教学和学习在研究中一直很普遍。在最初的搜索中,总共找到了198篇文章。研究者对这些文章的摘要进行筛选,以判断其相关性,在筛选摘要的过程中,31篇论文被纳入审查。回顾了发达国家和发展中国家在科学课程、教师教育和21世纪学习方面的研究趋势。基于这些发现,发达国家对科学教育中SPS的研究多于发展中国家。审查结果表明,在所有科学教育水平的科学课程文件和课程实施中,SPS的纳入并不均衡。最后,研究结果显示,在发达国家和发展中国家,关于21世纪学习的SPS教育的研究很少。有关教育机构必须适当、合理地开发SPS教育的教师培训,并考虑SPS在科学课程中的均衡纳入及其实施。SPS仍然支持个人在21世纪应该拥有的其他技能的发展。因此,科学教育中的SPS教育仍然是发达国家和发展中国家都需要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信