The crisis of the West, Russia's resistance and war: Paradigmatic changes in the world

Srđan Perišić
{"title":"The crisis of the West, Russia's resistance and war: Paradigmatic changes in the world","authors":"Srđan Perišić","doi":"10.5937/socpreg57-42989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The crisis of the West is perceived through the diminishing expansion of the postmodern paradigm to the non-Western parts of the world. The West entered the postmodern at the end of the 20th century, when liberalism remained alone in the political field, while the bipolar international order of the balance of power was destroyed. Liberal postmodernization of the world, initiated by globalization, was adamant. Postmodern liberalism imposed itself to the whole world as the only ideological matrix, whereas the global market and global corporations dictated the relations in the world. The Westphalian system of international relations, as one of the remaining modern categories implying the primacy of the sovereign state, began disappearing. However, the power of the hegemon USA as a military, political and ideological protector of globalization and postmodern, began dwindling in 2008 (a declining power). On the other hand, resistance emerged to the imposition of the postmodern. Russia was the first to adopt anti-liberal and anti-globalization laws (2013), which prompted the West to start a postmodern campaign against Russia. The USA and the West, faced with the increasing resistance, resort to geopolitical strategies from the period of the modern in order to preserve hegemony. Ukraine (as a postmodern creation in the mediation war against Russia) is geopolitically used against Russia). Russia opposes the postmodern West ideologically and geopolitically (by introducing spirituality and tradition in its public sphere) and it is geopolitically engaged in creating multipolarity and the balance of power. In this manner, Russia leaves the West. That creates a different paradigm, not only for Russia, but for the whole world. The paper considers the war a consequence and not a cause of the world crisis (which is also a consequence). The causes lie in the inability of the postmodern (in all its aspects) to impose itself onto the whole world.","PeriodicalId":32231,"journal":{"name":"Socioloski Pregled","volume":"136 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socioloski Pregled","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/socpreg57-42989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The crisis of the West is perceived through the diminishing expansion of the postmodern paradigm to the non-Western parts of the world. The West entered the postmodern at the end of the 20th century, when liberalism remained alone in the political field, while the bipolar international order of the balance of power was destroyed. Liberal postmodernization of the world, initiated by globalization, was adamant. Postmodern liberalism imposed itself to the whole world as the only ideological matrix, whereas the global market and global corporations dictated the relations in the world. The Westphalian system of international relations, as one of the remaining modern categories implying the primacy of the sovereign state, began disappearing. However, the power of the hegemon USA as a military, political and ideological protector of globalization and postmodern, began dwindling in 2008 (a declining power). On the other hand, resistance emerged to the imposition of the postmodern. Russia was the first to adopt anti-liberal and anti-globalization laws (2013), which prompted the West to start a postmodern campaign against Russia. The USA and the West, faced with the increasing resistance, resort to geopolitical strategies from the period of the modern in order to preserve hegemony. Ukraine (as a postmodern creation in the mediation war against Russia) is geopolitically used against Russia). Russia opposes the postmodern West ideologically and geopolitically (by introducing spirituality and tradition in its public sphere) and it is geopolitically engaged in creating multipolarity and the balance of power. In this manner, Russia leaves the West. That creates a different paradigm, not only for Russia, but for the whole world. The paper considers the war a consequence and not a cause of the world crisis (which is also a consequence). The causes lie in the inability of the postmodern (in all its aspects) to impose itself onto the whole world.
西方的危机,俄国的抵抗和战争:世界的典型变化
西方的危机是通过后现代范式向世界非西方地区不断缩小的扩张来感知的。20世纪末,西方进入后现代,自由主义在政治领域独霸天下,力量均势的两极国际秩序遭到破坏。由全球化发起的自由主义的世界后现代主义是坚定的。后现代自由主义把自己作为唯一的意识形态矩阵强加给整个世界,而全球市场和全球公司则决定了世界的关系。威斯特伐利亚体系的国际关系,作为现存的现代范畴之一,暗示着主权国家的首要地位,开始消失。然而,作为全球化和后现代的军事、政治和意识形态保护者,霸权美国的力量在2008年开始减弱(衰落的力量)。另一方面,对后现代主义强加的抵制也出现了。俄罗斯是第一个通过反自由主义和反全球化法律的国家(2013年),这促使西方开始了针对俄罗斯的后现代运动。面对日益增长的阻力,美国和西方国家从近代开始采取地缘政治战略来维护霸权。乌克兰(作为针对俄罗斯的调解战争中的后现代产物)在地缘政治上被用来对付俄罗斯。俄罗斯在意识形态和地缘政治上反对后现代西方(通过在公共领域引入精神和传统),在地缘政治上致力于创造多极化和权力平衡。就这样,俄罗斯离开了西方。这创造了一个不同的范例,不仅对俄罗斯,而且对整个世界。这篇论文认为战争是世界危机的结果,而不是原因(世界危机也是结果之一)。原因在于后现代主义(在其所有方面)无法将自己强加给整个世界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书