Analysis of the Responses to Covid-19 in Australia, New Zealand, and Indonesia: the tale of the three Island States

Qiuli Chen
{"title":"Analysis of the Responses to Covid-19 in Australia, New Zealand, and Indonesia: the tale of the three Island States","authors":"Qiuli Chen","doi":"10.36648/1791-809X.21.15.825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: At the end of 2019, a new pneumonia disease caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first spreading in Wuhan, China, and has continued to spread throughout the world. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared it was a pandemic. Many countries are aware of the risks of the novel coronavirus and have adopted different measures to contain the spread of the virus. However, the spread of the virus and its impact is variable across countries including Australia, New Zealand, and Indonesia. This paper aims to compare and contrast the epidemics in Australia, New Zealand, and Indonesia, then identify the containment strategies in these countries in order to facilitate cross-country learning. Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study to understand the epidemic and explain the variability of the epidemic in these three Island States. Results: We have found that Australia and New Zealand have implemented public health measures, including good governance of the epidemics, communication, social distancing and personal hygiene measures, and provided sufficient medical services. On the contrary, these measures are either non-existent or implemented inadequately in Indonesia. Conclusions and implications for public health: We argue that the implementation of these public health measures and provision of medical services are all necessary to control the COVID-19 epidemics in Indonesia and other countries.","PeriodicalId":12868,"journal":{"name":"Health science journal","volume":"345 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health science journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36648/1791-809X.21.15.825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: At the end of 2019, a new pneumonia disease caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was first spreading in Wuhan, China, and has continued to spread throughout the world. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared it was a pandemic. Many countries are aware of the risks of the novel coronavirus and have adopted different measures to contain the spread of the virus. However, the spread of the virus and its impact is variable across countries including Australia, New Zealand, and Indonesia. This paper aims to compare and contrast the epidemics in Australia, New Zealand, and Indonesia, then identify the containment strategies in these countries in order to facilitate cross-country learning. Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study to understand the epidemic and explain the variability of the epidemic in these three Island States. Results: We have found that Australia and New Zealand have implemented public health measures, including good governance of the epidemics, communication, social distancing and personal hygiene measures, and provided sufficient medical services. On the contrary, these measures are either non-existent or implemented inadequately in Indonesia. Conclusions and implications for public health: We argue that the implementation of these public health measures and provision of medical services are all necessary to control the COVID-19 epidemics in Indonesia and other countries.
分析澳大利亚、新西兰和印度尼西亚应对Covid-19的措施:三个岛国的故事
目的:2019年底,一种由严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)引起的新型肺炎疾病首次在中国武汉蔓延,并继续在全球蔓延。2020年3月11日,世界卫生组织宣布这是一场大流行。许多国家都意识到新型冠状病毒的风险,并采取了不同的措施来遏制病毒的传播。然而,病毒的传播及其影响在澳大利亚、新西兰和印度尼西亚等国家有所不同。本文旨在比较和对比澳大利亚、新西兰和印度尼西亚的流行病,然后确定这些国家的遏制战略,以便于跨国学习。方法:我们进行了一项混合方法研究,以了解这一流行病并解释这三个岛屿国家流行病的变异性。结果:我们发现澳大利亚和新西兰实施了公共卫生措施,包括对流行病的良好治理、沟通、保持社交距离和个人卫生措施,并提供了充足的医疗服务。相反,这些措施在印度尼西亚要么不存在,要么执行得不充分。结论和对公共卫生的影响:我们认为,实施这些公共卫生措施和提供医疗服务对于控制印度尼西亚和其他国家的COVID-19流行病都是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信