Political Economy of Rural Credit Market:The Case of Indian Punjab

S. Sharma, B. Shergill
{"title":"Political Economy of Rural Credit Market:The Case of Indian Punjab","authors":"S. Sharma, B. Shergill","doi":"10.21648/ARTHAVIJ/2018/V60/I4/178085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"India’s rural poor – small and marginal farmers, agricultural labourers and other marginalized sections of rural population - face exploitative conditions today. Since Indian independence policy initiatives have been taken to mitigate their sufferings through interventions in the rural credit market by the Indian state. In this paper we undertake an evaluation of these policies in altering the sources of rural debt primarily from non-institutional to institutional sources till the economic reforms in early 1991 and then followed by reversal in trends: return of money lenders and land lords in the rural credit market. A counter argument is provided to the generally advanced argument that the implementation failure of priority sector lending led to economic reforms. Our argument is a willful design was erected by rural elite in pursuit of helping industrial capital to prepare ground for international capital to persuade Indian state to join the globalization process. Besides other data, we bring in primary data on indebtedness of 255 HHs of small and marginal farmers and landless workers in 10 villages across five blocks of district Mansa and 532 NREGA beneficiaries in 47 villages of Hoshiarpur, Muktsar and Amritsar districts (Punjab) to show that with the withdrawal of the state, money lenders and landlords have returned to the rural credit market in regions/areas inhabited by low caste and land poor people.","PeriodicalId":84206,"journal":{"name":"Artha vijnana : journal of the Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Poona (India) = Artha vijnana : Gokhale Artha Sastra Samstha Dvara Prakasita Traimesika Patrika","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artha vijnana : journal of the Gokhale Institute of Politics and Economics, Poona (India) = Artha vijnana : Gokhale Artha Sastra Samstha Dvara Prakasita Traimesika Patrika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21648/ARTHAVIJ/2018/V60/I4/178085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

India’s rural poor – small and marginal farmers, agricultural labourers and other marginalized sections of rural population - face exploitative conditions today. Since Indian independence policy initiatives have been taken to mitigate their sufferings through interventions in the rural credit market by the Indian state. In this paper we undertake an evaluation of these policies in altering the sources of rural debt primarily from non-institutional to institutional sources till the economic reforms in early 1991 and then followed by reversal in trends: return of money lenders and land lords in the rural credit market. A counter argument is provided to the generally advanced argument that the implementation failure of priority sector lending led to economic reforms. Our argument is a willful design was erected by rural elite in pursuit of helping industrial capital to prepare ground for international capital to persuade Indian state to join the globalization process. Besides other data, we bring in primary data on indebtedness of 255 HHs of small and marginal farmers and landless workers in 10 villages across five blocks of district Mansa and 532 NREGA beneficiaries in 47 villages of Hoshiarpur, Muktsar and Amritsar districts (Punjab) to show that with the withdrawal of the state, money lenders and landlords have returned to the rural credit market in regions/areas inhabited by low caste and land poor people.
农村信贷市场的政治经济学:以印度旁遮普为例
印度的农村贫困人口——小农和边缘农民、农业劳动者和其他边缘农村人口——今天面临着被剥削的条件。自印度独立以来,已采取政策举措,通过印度国家对农村信贷市场的干预来减轻他们的痛苦。在本文中,我们对这些政策在改变农村债务来源方面进行了评估,这些政策主要是从非机构来源转变为机构来源,直到1991年初的经济改革,然后是趋势的逆转:放债人和地主在农村信贷市场的回归。对于优先部门贷款的执行失败导致经济改革这一普遍先进的论点,本文提出了一个相反的论点。我们的论点是农村精英为了帮助产业资本为国际资本说服印度国家加入全球化进程做准备而故意设计的。除了其他数据外,我们还带来了Mansa区5个街区10个村庄的255名小农户和边缘农民和无地工人的HHs债务的原始数据,以及旁遮普邦Hoshiarpur、Muktsar和Amritsar地区47个村庄的532名NREGA受益人的债务数据,以表明随着国家的退出,在低种姓和土地贫困人口居住的地区/地区,放债人和地主已经回到农村信贷市场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信