Transitional Justice and Peacebuilding: The ICC and TJRC processes in Kenya

M. Wambua
{"title":"Transitional Justice and Peacebuilding: The ICC and TJRC processes in Kenya","authors":"M. Wambua","doi":"10.2979/AFRICONFPEACREVI.9.1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Transitional justice is a critical component in peacebuilding in post-conflict regimes. States recovering from periods of protracted structural or manifest conflict institute restorative and retributive transitional justice mechanisms with the aim of pursuing justice for victims and perpetrators. There is, however, a phenomenon that has been observed in the international system whereby post-conflict regimes that have initiated transitional justice interventions in pursuit of a sustainable peace experience relapse into violence. This paper examines the outcome and impact of transitional justice interventions in peacebuilding in post-conflict regimes using the case of Kenya. The study integrates a descriptive and explanatory multiple case study of the Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission and the International Criminal Court processes to examine the intersection of transitional justice and peacebuilding in the country. The paper demonstrates that these transitional justice processes suffered legislative enactment and enforcement inadequacies as well as limitations of state interference and local ownership that hindered their effectiveness. Due to noncooperation and non-compliance in their implementation, these transitional justice mechanisms failed to respond to the protracted latent and manifest antagonisms between perpetrators and victims, thereby constraining the peacebuilding agenda in the country.","PeriodicalId":7615,"journal":{"name":"African Conflict & Peacebuilding Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Conflict & Peacebuilding Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/AFRICONFPEACREVI.9.1.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Transitional justice is a critical component in peacebuilding in post-conflict regimes. States recovering from periods of protracted structural or manifest conflict institute restorative and retributive transitional justice mechanisms with the aim of pursuing justice for victims and perpetrators. There is, however, a phenomenon that has been observed in the international system whereby post-conflict regimes that have initiated transitional justice interventions in pursuit of a sustainable peace experience relapse into violence. This paper examines the outcome and impact of transitional justice interventions in peacebuilding in post-conflict regimes using the case of Kenya. The study integrates a descriptive and explanatory multiple case study of the Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission and the International Criminal Court processes to examine the intersection of transitional justice and peacebuilding in the country. The paper demonstrates that these transitional justice processes suffered legislative enactment and enforcement inadequacies as well as limitations of state interference and local ownership that hindered their effectiveness. Due to noncooperation and non-compliance in their implementation, these transitional justice mechanisms failed to respond to the protracted latent and manifest antagonisms between perpetrators and victims, thereby constraining the peacebuilding agenda in the country.
过渡时期司法与建设和平:肯尼亚的国际刑事法院和TJRC进程
摘要:过渡时期司法是冲突后国家和平建设的重要组成部分。从长期结构性或明显冲突中恢复过来的国家建立了恢复性和报复性过渡司法机制,目的是为受害者和肇事者伸张正义。然而,在国际体系中观察到一种现象,即为追求可持续和平而开始过渡司法干预的冲突后政权又重新陷入暴力。本文以肯尼亚为例,考察了冲突后政权建设和平中过渡司法干预的结果和影响。该研究整合了对真相、司法与和解委员会和国际刑事法院程序的描述性和解释性多个案例研究,以审查该国过渡时期司法与建设和平的交集。本文表明,这些过渡司法程序受到立法制定和执行的不足以及国家干预和地方所有权的限制,阻碍了它们的有效性。由于在执行过程中不合作和不遵守,这些过渡司法机制未能对肇事者和受害者之间长期潜伏和明显的对抗作出反应,从而限制了该国的建设和平议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信