Jankovichian, Szeletian or a leaf point industry: Analysis of three small lithic assamblages

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Markó András
{"title":"Jankovichian, Szeletian or a leaf point industry: Analysis of three small lithic assamblages","authors":"Markó András","doi":"10.1556/072.2019.70.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The eponymous site of the Jankovichian industry was found at the Oreg kő cliff, in the northern part of the Transdanubia, Western Hungary. From the thick layer complex of the Jankovich cave, however, only 104 lithics were collected and the scarce data showed that the pieces belong to several archaeological entities. At the same time, the nearly total lack of the field documentation allowed the reconstruction of the stratigraphic position of each artefact only in a few cases.The stratigraphic integrity is missing from the archaeological material of the Kiskevely and Szelim caves as well as the Csakvar rock shelter, and according to the recent evaluations the bifacial tools from the Dzerava skala (Palffy cave) and Lovas belong to the Micoquian and the Late Palaeolithic period. In this paper we analyse the following three assemblages, excavated after World War II in Transdanubia: the Pilisszanto rock shelter II, the Bivak and the Remete Felső caves.The chronological, basically, bio-stratigraphic data known from these layers are also evaluated.The conclusion of the study is that (1) the chronological data of the studied sites do not permit to place the archaeological occupation of each cave into the Early Wurm or to the Late Middle Palaeolithic period and (2) the validity of a distinct Jankovichian industry cannot be proved.","PeriodicalId":35002,"journal":{"name":"Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae","volume":"142 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/072.2019.70.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The eponymous site of the Jankovichian industry was found at the Oreg kő cliff, in the northern part of the Transdanubia, Western Hungary. From the thick layer complex of the Jankovich cave, however, only 104 lithics were collected and the scarce data showed that the pieces belong to several archaeological entities. At the same time, the nearly total lack of the field documentation allowed the reconstruction of the stratigraphic position of each artefact only in a few cases.The stratigraphic integrity is missing from the archaeological material of the Kiskevely and Szelim caves as well as the Csakvar rock shelter, and according to the recent evaluations the bifacial tools from the Dzerava skala (Palffy cave) and Lovas belong to the Micoquian and the Late Palaeolithic period. In this paper we analyse the following three assemblages, excavated after World War II in Transdanubia: the Pilisszanto rock shelter II, the Bivak and the Remete Felső caves.The chronological, basically, bio-stratigraphic data known from these layers are also evaluated.The conclusion of the study is that (1) the chronological data of the studied sites do not permit to place the archaeological occupation of each cave into the Early Wurm or to the Late Middle Palaeolithic period and (2) the validity of a distinct Jankovichian industry cannot be proved.
jankovician, Szeletian或a叶点工业:三种小型岩屑组合的分析
扬科维奇工业的同名遗址是在匈牙利西部外多瑙河北部的Oreg kekov悬崖上发现的。然而,从Jankovich洞穴的厚层复合体中,只收集了104块岩石,稀缺的数据表明这些碎片属于几个考古实体。同时,由于几乎完全缺乏实地文件,只能在少数情况下重建每件人工制品的地层位置。Kiskevely洞穴和Szelim洞穴以及Csakvar岩洞的考古材料地层完整性缺失,根据最近的评估,Dzerava skala (Palffy洞穴)和Lovas的双面工具属于Micoquian和旧石器时代晚期。在本文中,我们分析了第二次世界大战后在外多瑙河出土的三个组合:Pilisszanto岩石庇护所II, Bivak和Remete felsser洞穴。从这些地层中得到的年代学,基本上是生物地层学数据也进行了评估。该研究的结论是:(1)所研究遗址的年代数据不允许将每个洞穴的考古占领置于早期蚯蚓或旧石器时代中期晚期;(2)无法证明jankovician工业的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae
Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The periodical is devoted to the results achieved by Hungarian archaeologists. It covers studies of the most important excavations, finds and problems of the period from the Paleolithic to the Middle Ages. It contains, further, short papers on individual finds and comprehensive reports on the single fields of research, as well. Publishes book reviews and advertisements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信