Relevance instructions and memory for text. The role of instruction specificity and text length (Instrucciones de relevancia y recuerdo de textos. El rol de la especificidad de la instrucción y de la longitud del texto)

IF 1.1 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Héctor García-Rodicio
{"title":"Relevance instructions and memory for text. The role of instruction specificity and text length (Instrucciones de relevancia y recuerdo de textos. El rol de la especificidad de la instrucción y de la longitud del texto)","authors":"Héctor García-Rodicio","doi":"10.1080/11356405.2022.2121132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We examined two factors that influence the effect of relevance instructions on memory for text, namely, instruction specificity and text length. In Experiment 1, 111 undergraduate students read a 1,182-word-long text describing an exotic country. Some students were provided with a general instruction (to focus on one subtopic of the text), others were provided with specific instructions (what-questions inserted into the text), and the rest were provided with a neutral instruction (they were asked just to read for understanding). Those receiving specific instructions recalled the relevant information better; those in the general instruction condition did not show better memory for the relevant information. In Experiment 2, 170 undergraduate students read either the long version of the exotic country text, comprising 1,182 words, or a shortened, 603-word-long version. Half of the students received the general instruction, whereas the rest received the neutral instruction. When the text was short, the participants receiving the general instruction recalled the relevant information better; when the text was long, they did not show better memory for the relevant information.","PeriodicalId":51688,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Education","volume":"36 1","pages":"94 - 119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture and Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2022.2121132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT We examined two factors that influence the effect of relevance instructions on memory for text, namely, instruction specificity and text length. In Experiment 1, 111 undergraduate students read a 1,182-word-long text describing an exotic country. Some students were provided with a general instruction (to focus on one subtopic of the text), others were provided with specific instructions (what-questions inserted into the text), and the rest were provided with a neutral instruction (they were asked just to read for understanding). Those receiving specific instructions recalled the relevant information better; those in the general instruction condition did not show better memory for the relevant information. In Experiment 2, 170 undergraduate students read either the long version of the exotic country text, comprising 1,182 words, or a shortened, 603-word-long version. Half of the students received the general instruction, whereas the rest received the neutral instruction. When the text was short, the participants receiving the general instruction recalled the relevant information better; when the text was long, they did not show better memory for the relevant information.
= =地理= =根据美国人口普查,该镇总面积为。教学专一性和文本长度的作用。指令特异性和文本长度的作用)
摘要本研究考察了影响关联指令对文本记忆影响的两个因素,即指令特异性和文本长度。在实验1中,111名本科生阅读了一篇1182个单词的描述异国情调的文章。一些学生得到了一般的指导(专注于文本的一个小主题),另一些学生得到了具体的指导(在文本中插入了什么问题),其余的学生得到了中性的指导(他们只被要求阅读以理解)。接受具体指示的人能更好地回忆相关信息;那些在一般指令条件下的人对相关信息的记忆没有表现出更好的记忆力。在实验2中,170名本科生阅读了包含1182个单词的长篇异域国家文章和包含603个单词的短篇文章。一半的学生接受了一般的指导,而其余的则接受了中性的指导。当文本较短时,接受一般指导的参与者能更好地回忆起相关信息;当文本较长时,他们对相关信息的记忆力并没有提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Culture and Education
Culture and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信