Detection of Liver Disorder Using RBF SVM in Comparison with Naïve Bayes to Measure the Accuracy, Precision, Sensitivity and Specificity

M. Madhu, Dr.Kirupa Ganapathy
{"title":"Detection of Liver Disorder Using RBF SVM in Comparison with Naïve Bayes to Measure the Accuracy, Precision, Sensitivity and Specificity","authors":"M. Madhu, Dr.Kirupa Ganapathy","doi":"10.47059/alinteri/v36i1/ajas21093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Machine learning techniques are rapidly used in the area of medical research due to its impressive results in diagnosis and prediction of diseases. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of SVM classifier in identification of liver disorder by comparing it with Naive Bayes algorithm. Methods and Materials: A total of 31619 samples are collected from three liver disease datasets available in kaggle. These samples are divided into training dataset (n = 22133 [70%]) and test dataset (n = 9486 [30%]). Accuracy, precision, specificity and sensitivity values are calculated to quantify the performance of the SVM algorithm. Results: SVM achieved accuracy, precision, sensitivity and specificity of 73.64%, 97.82%, 97.56% and 69.77% respectively compared to 57.31%, 41.39%, 94.87% and 37.20% by Naive Bayes algorithm. Conclusion: In this study it is found that the RBF SVM algorithm performed better than the Naive Bayes algorithm in liver disorder detection of the datasets considered.","PeriodicalId":42396,"journal":{"name":"Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47059/alinteri/v36i1/ajas21093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Machine learning techniques are rapidly used in the area of medical research due to its impressive results in diagnosis and prediction of diseases. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of SVM classifier in identification of liver disorder by comparing it with Naive Bayes algorithm. Methods and Materials: A total of 31619 samples are collected from three liver disease datasets available in kaggle. These samples are divided into training dataset (n = 22133 [70%]) and test dataset (n = 9486 [30%]). Accuracy, precision, specificity and sensitivity values are calculated to quantify the performance of the SVM algorithm. Results: SVM achieved accuracy, precision, sensitivity and specificity of 73.64%, 97.82%, 97.56% and 69.77% respectively compared to 57.31%, 41.39%, 94.87% and 37.20% by Naive Bayes algorithm. Conclusion: In this study it is found that the RBF SVM algorithm performed better than the Naive Bayes algorithm in liver disorder detection of the datasets considered.
用RBF支持向量机检测肝脏疾病与Naïve贝叶斯比较其准确性、精密度、灵敏度和特异性
目的:机器学习技术因其在疾病诊断和预测方面令人印象深刻的结果而迅速应用于医学研究领域。本研究的目的是通过将SVM分类器与朴素贝叶斯算法进行比较,评估SVM分类器在肝脏疾病识别中的性能。方法和材料:从kaggle中可获得的三个肝脏疾病数据集中收集了31619个样本。这些样本被分为训练数据集(n = 22133[70%])和测试数据集(n = 9486[30%])。计算了支持向量机算法的准确度、精密度、特异性和灵敏度值,以量化支持向量机算法的性能。结果:SVM的准确率、精密度、灵敏度和特异度分别为73.64%、97.82%、97.56%和69.77%,而朴素贝叶斯算法的准确率、精密度、灵敏度和特异度分别为57.31%、41.39%、94.87%和37.20%。结论:本研究发现,在考虑的数据集上,RBF SVM算法在肝脏疾病检测方面优于朴素贝叶斯算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences
Alinteri Journal of Agriculture Sciences AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信