Clarity of read outline discussion evaluation models to improve students' communication skills

A. Kusuma, Wasis Wass, E. Susantini, Rusmansyah Romanza
{"title":"Clarity of read outline discussion evaluation models to improve students' communication skills","authors":"A. Kusuma, Wasis Wass, E. Susantini, Rusmansyah Romanza","doi":"10.18844/ijlt.v15i3.9063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Read Outline Discussion Evaluation (RODE) learning model is designed to improve students' communication skills. This study aims to assess the validity and reliability of the RODE learning model with the Read, Outline, Discussion, and Evaluation (RODE) syntax. Three education experts evaluated learning materials to assess the validity and reliability of the RODE learning models. The RODE learning model validation sheet was filled out by experts who review and appraise the researcher's learning model. The three experts reviewed the hypothetical draft model and assessed it on the validation assessment sheet according to the guidelines of the validation instrument. The validity and reliability of the RODE Learning model were determined using a qualitative descriptive technique and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The findings revealed that the RODE Learning model satisfied the validity and reliability standards. Therefore, the Read Outline Discussion Evaluation is a valid and reliable learning model that can be used to improve students' communication skills. \nKeywords: Communication Skills; Reliability, RODE; Student; Validity","PeriodicalId":93451,"journal":{"name":"International journal of learning and teaching","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of learning and teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18844/ijlt.v15i3.9063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Read Outline Discussion Evaluation (RODE) learning model is designed to improve students' communication skills. This study aims to assess the validity and reliability of the RODE learning model with the Read, Outline, Discussion, and Evaluation (RODE) syntax. Three education experts evaluated learning materials to assess the validity and reliability of the RODE learning models. The RODE learning model validation sheet was filled out by experts who review and appraise the researcher's learning model. The three experts reviewed the hypothetical draft model and assessed it on the validation assessment sheet according to the guidelines of the validation instrument. The validity and reliability of the RODE Learning model were determined using a qualitative descriptive technique and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The findings revealed that the RODE Learning model satisfied the validity and reliability standards. Therefore, the Read Outline Discussion Evaluation is a valid and reliable learning model that can be used to improve students' communication skills. Keywords: Communication Skills; Reliability, RODE; Student; Validity
清晰的阅读大纲讨论评价模式,提高学生的沟通能力
阅读大纲讨论评价(RODE)学习模式旨在提高学生的沟通能力。本研究旨在评估使用阅读、概述、讨论和评估(RODE)语法的RODE学习模型的效度和可靠性。三位教育专家对学习材料进行了评估,以评估RODE学习模型的有效性和可靠性。RODE学习模型验证表由审查和评估研究人员学习模型的专家填写。三位专家对假设的模型草案进行了审查,并根据验证工具的指南在验证评估表上进行了评估。使用定性描述技术和Cronbach's alpha系数来确定RODE学习模型的效度和信度。结果表明,该学习模型满足效度和信度标准。因此,阅读提纲讨论评价是一种有效可靠的学习模式,可以用来提高学生的沟通能力。关键词:沟通技巧;可靠性、骑马;学生;有效性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信