Stochastic preemptive goal programming of Air Force weapon systems mix

IF 1 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
J. Anderson, Jessica M Astudillo, Zachary Butcher, Matthew D Cornman, Anthony J Correale, James B. Crumpacker, Nathaniel C Dennie, Alexandra R Gaines, Mark A. Gallagher, John C Goodwill, Emily S. Graves, Donald B Hale, Kimberly G Holland, B. D. Huffman, M. McGee, Nicholas A Pollack, Rachel C. Ramirez, Camero Song, Emmie K Swize, Erick A Tello, Jesse G. Wales, J. C. Walker, A. B. Wilson, William F. Wilson, Kylie E Wooten, M. Zawadzki
{"title":"Stochastic preemptive goal programming of Air Force weapon systems mix","authors":"J. Anderson, Jessica M Astudillo, Zachary Butcher, Matthew D Cornman, Anthony J Correale, James B. Crumpacker, Nathaniel C Dennie, Alexandra R Gaines, Mark A. Gallagher, John C Goodwill, Emily S. Graves, Donald B Hale, Kimberly G Holland, B. D. Huffman, M. McGee, Nicholas A Pollack, Rachel C. Ramirez, Camero Song, Emmie K Swize, Erick A Tello, Jesse G. Wales, J. C. Walker, A. B. Wilson, William F. Wilson, Kylie E Wooten, M. Zawadzki","doi":"10.1177/15485129211051751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We demonstrate a new approach to conducting a military force structure study under uncertainty. We apply the stochastic preemptive goal program approach, described by Ledwith et al., to balance probabilistic goals for military force effectiveness and the force’s cost. We use the Bayesian Enterprise Analytic Model (BEAM), as described in “Probabilistic Analysis of Complex Combat Scenarios,” to evaluate effectiveness, expressed in terms of the probability of achieving campaign objectives, in three hypothetical scenarios. We develop cost estimates along with their uncertainty to evaluate the force’s research and development, production, and annual operating and support costs. Our summary depicts how the trade-off between various prioritized goals influences the recommended robust force. Our approach enables defense leaders to balance risk in both force effectiveness in various scenarios along with risk in different types of cost categories.","PeriodicalId":44661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation-Applications Methodology Technology-JDMS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation-Applications Methodology Technology-JDMS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15485129211051751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We demonstrate a new approach to conducting a military force structure study under uncertainty. We apply the stochastic preemptive goal program approach, described by Ledwith et al., to balance probabilistic goals for military force effectiveness and the force’s cost. We use the Bayesian Enterprise Analytic Model (BEAM), as described in “Probabilistic Analysis of Complex Combat Scenarios,” to evaluate effectiveness, expressed in terms of the probability of achieving campaign objectives, in three hypothetical scenarios. We develop cost estimates along with their uncertainty to evaluate the force’s research and development, production, and annual operating and support costs. Our summary depicts how the trade-off between various prioritized goals influences the recommended robust force. Our approach enables defense leaders to balance risk in both force effectiveness in various scenarios along with risk in different types of cost categories.
空军武器系统混合随机先发制人目标规划
我们展示了在不确定性下进行军事力量结构研究的新方法。我们应用Ledwith等人描述的随机先发制人目标规划方法来平衡军事力量有效性和部队成本的概率目标。我们使用贝叶斯企业分析模型(BEAM),如“复杂战斗场景的概率分析”中所述,在三个假设场景中以实现战役目标的概率来评估有效性。我们根据其不确定性进行成本估算,以评估部队的研发、生产、年度运营和支持成本。我们的摘要描述了各种优先级目标之间的权衡如何影响推荐的鲁棒力。我们的方法使国防领导人能够平衡各种情况下部队有效性的风险以及不同类型成本类别的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信