PELANGGARAN BIDAL KESANTUNAN BERBAHASA WARGANET DALAM KOLOM KOMENTAR TWITTER @FIERSABESARI

Fon Pub Date : 2022-04-04 DOI:10.25134/fon.v18i1.4486
Niken Thalia Ayupradani, Endah Riski Kartini, Syahwa Minastiti, D. Pratiwi
{"title":"PELANGGARAN BIDAL KESANTUNAN BERBAHASA WARGANET DALAM KOLOM KOMENTAR TWITTER @FIERSABESARI","authors":"Niken Thalia Ayupradani, Endah Riski Kartini, Syahwa Minastiti, D. Pratiwi","doi":"10.25134/fon.v18i1.4486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Politeness in language is actually close to everyday life. Now, coupled with advances in technology, it is easier for people to establish communication. Communication relations can run well if they prioritize the principle of politeness. The principle of politeness can always be upheld both speaking in social media and face to face. If you do not comply with the principle of politeness, then the speech is not polite. The purpose of this study is to describe the form of speech that violates the principle of politeness in @FiersaBesari's twitter, especially in the reply column. The special tweets that were chosen were about speeches that criticized and satirized the Indonesian government. The violation of politeness is measured by the principle of unity in the form of a thimble. The research method uses data collection techniques by observing, recording, and documenting. The data analysis technique in this study used the agih method with the BUL basic technique and the extended extension technique. The results of this study describe various forms of speech that violate the principle of politeness. The thimbles that were violated were the thimble of appreciation, the thimble of consensus, and the thimble of sympathy. Of the six thimbles used to measure politeness, there were three thimbles that found violations.","PeriodicalId":34420,"journal":{"name":"Fon","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25134/fon.v18i1.4486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Politeness in language is actually close to everyday life. Now, coupled with advances in technology, it is easier for people to establish communication. Communication relations can run well if they prioritize the principle of politeness. The principle of politeness can always be upheld both speaking in social media and face to face. If you do not comply with the principle of politeness, then the speech is not polite. The purpose of this study is to describe the form of speech that violates the principle of politeness in @FiersaBesari's twitter, especially in the reply column. The special tweets that were chosen were about speeches that criticized and satirized the Indonesian government. The violation of politeness is measured by the principle of unity in the form of a thimble. The research method uses data collection techniques by observing, recording, and documenting. The data analysis technique in this study used the agih method with the BUL basic technique and the extended extension technique. The results of this study describe various forms of speech that violate the principle of politeness. The thimbles that were violated were the thimble of appreciation, the thimble of consensus, and the thimble of sympathy. Of the six thimbles used to measure politeness, there were three thimbles that found violations.
在@FIERSABESARI的推特评论栏中,人们对使用公民语言的顶尖性侵犯
语言中的礼貌实际上与日常生活息息相关。现在,随着科技的进步,人们更容易建立联系。如果把礼貌的原则放在首位,交际关系就会运行得很好。无论是在社交媒体上说话还是面对面说话,礼貌的原则都是可以坚持的。如果你不遵守礼貌的原则,那么讲话就是不礼貌的。本研究的目的是描述@FiersaBesari的twitter中违反礼貌原则的言语形式,特别是在回复栏中。被选中的特别推文是关于批评和讽刺印尼政府的演讲。违反礼貌的行为是用顶针的形式用统一原则来衡量的。该研究方法通过观察、记录和记录来收集数据。本研究的数据分析技术采用abh法结合BUL基本技术和扩展扩展技术。这项研究的结果描述了违反礼貌原则的各种语言形式。被破坏的顶针是欣赏的顶针、一致的顶针和同情的顶针。在用来衡量礼貌的六个顶针中,有三个顶针发现了违规行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fon
Fon
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信