Predictors of β-Blocker Initiation After Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
R. P. Hickson, Candace J. Brancato, D. Moga
{"title":"Predictors of β-Blocker Initiation After Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes","authors":"R. P. Hickson, Candace J. Brancato, D. Moga","doi":"10.1177/8755122516649204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Beta-blockers remain important for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction (MI). Despite clinical guideline recommendations, underutilization of this pharmacotherapy continues in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) compared to the general post-MI population. Objective: This study aimed to (1) quantify the proportion of T2DM patients utilizing β-blocker therapy within 30 days of hospital discharge after MI and (2) identify clinical and demographic characteristics predicting initiation of β-blocker therapy. Methods: A retrospective cohort of US employed, commercially insured individuals was assembled using de-identified enrollment files, medical claims, and pharmacy claims from 2007 to 2009. Inclusion criteria were the following: (1) type 2 diabetes, (2) ≥18 years old, (3) continuous eligibility, (4) MI. Multivariable logistic regression with adjusted odds ratios (ORadj) using manual backward elimination was used to identify predictors of β-blocker initiation within 30 days of discharge from index hospitalization. Results: Of 341 T2DM patients, 167 (49.0%) were new users and 174 (51.0%) were nonusers of β-blockers within 30 days of post-MI hospital discharge. Patients on a calcium channel blocker (ORadj 2.63) and patients taking 1 to 5 medications (ORadj 3.59) were more likely to initiate β-blockers post-MI. Patients with heart failure (ORadj 0.45) or an arrhythmia (ORadj 0.44) were less likely to initiate β-blockers as well as patients with renal failure not taking a diuretic (ORadj 0.17). Conclusions: These results confirm previous findings that β-blockers are underutilized in T2DM patients post-MI. Predictors from the regression model can guide future research investigating how this deviation from guidelines is attributed to prescriber versus patient behavior.","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":"24 1","pages":"160 - 168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/8755122516649204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Beta-blockers remain important for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction (MI). Despite clinical guideline recommendations, underutilization of this pharmacotherapy continues in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) compared to the general post-MI population. Objective: This study aimed to (1) quantify the proportion of T2DM patients utilizing β-blocker therapy within 30 days of hospital discharge after MI and (2) identify clinical and demographic characteristics predicting initiation of β-blocker therapy. Methods: A retrospective cohort of US employed, commercially insured individuals was assembled using de-identified enrollment files, medical claims, and pharmacy claims from 2007 to 2009. Inclusion criteria were the following: (1) type 2 diabetes, (2) ≥18 years old, (3) continuous eligibility, (4) MI. Multivariable logistic regression with adjusted odds ratios (ORadj) using manual backward elimination was used to identify predictors of β-blocker initiation within 30 days of discharge from index hospitalization. Results: Of 341 T2DM patients, 167 (49.0%) were new users and 174 (51.0%) were nonusers of β-blockers within 30 days of post-MI hospital discharge. Patients on a calcium channel blocker (ORadj 2.63) and patients taking 1 to 5 medications (ORadj 3.59) were more likely to initiate β-blockers post-MI. Patients with heart failure (ORadj 0.45) or an arrhythmia (ORadj 0.44) were less likely to initiate β-blockers as well as patients with renal failure not taking a diuretic (ORadj 0.17). Conclusions: These results confirm previous findings that β-blockers are underutilized in T2DM patients post-MI. Predictors from the regression model can guide future research investigating how this deviation from guidelines is attributed to prescriber versus patient behavior.
2型糖尿病患者心肌梗死后β受体阻滞剂启动的预测因素
背景:β受体阻滞剂在心肌梗死(MI)后的二级预防中仍然很重要。尽管有临床指南推荐,但与一般心肌梗死后人群相比,2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者仍未充分利用这种药物治疗。目的:本研究旨在(1)量化心肌梗死后出院30天内使用β-受体阻滞剂治疗的T2DM患者比例;(2)确定预测β-受体阻滞剂治疗开始的临床和人口学特征。方法:使用2007年至2009年的去识别登记档案、医疗索赔和药房索赔,对美国就业、商业保险个人进行回顾性队列研究。纳入标准如下:(1)2型糖尿病,(2)≥18岁,(3)持续合格性,(4)心肌梗死。采用人工反向排除的多变量logistic回归校正比值比(ORadj)来确定指标住院出院后30天内β受体阻滞剂开始使用的预测因素。结果:341例T2DM患者中,167例(49.0%)是心肌梗死出院后30天内新使用β-受体阻滞剂的患者,174例(51.0%)未使用β-受体阻滞剂。服用钙通道阻滞剂(ORadj 2.63)和服用1 - 5种药物(ORadj 3.59)的患者更有可能在心肌梗死后开始使用β受体阻滞剂。心力衰竭患者(ORadj 0.45)或心律失常患者(ORadj 0.44)和肾功能衰竭患者不服用利尿剂(ORadj 0.17)的可能性较小。结论:这些结果证实了先前的发现,β受体阻滞剂在心肌梗死后T2DM患者中的应用不足。回归模型的预测因子可以指导未来的研究,调查这种偏离指南是如何归因于处方者和患者行为的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信