Chiming Huang, Kimber Husak, Vaidyhanathan Vaishnavi, R. Huang
{"title":"Concussions in Boxers: Head Rotations and Neck Stiffness","authors":"Chiming Huang, Kimber Husak, Vaidyhanathan Vaishnavi, R. Huang","doi":"10.33425/2692-7918.1014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The human head-and-neck has three degrees of rotational freedom – pitch, roll, and yaw. While the evolution of the head-and-neck mobility may have increased the overall fitness of homo sapiens, our head-and-neck mobility may have also introduced some differential vulnerability to injuries in impact-induced head rotations about the pitch, roll, and yaw axes. Methods and Findings: We examined impact-induced head rotations in boxing matches by analyzing videos. Our objective was to seek a quantitative relationship between impact-induced head kinematics and the knockout outcome. For each of the three rotational degrees of freedom, head angular velocities of impact-induced head rotations were significantly higher in knockout hits than in control hits without a knockout (p < 0.02). Knockout thresholds in pitch-roll-yaw measured as impact-induced head angular velocities were anisotropic with the lowest threshold in roll and became progressively higher in yaw and pitch, in that order. Regardless of the pitch-roll-yaw bearing, the velocities of the striking fists in knockout hits were not significantly higher than those in control hits. Conclusions: Accurate prediction of knockout via head kinematics was possible with pitch-roll-yaw information. Impact-induced head kinematics was strongly influenced by neck stiffness, making a case for the utility of reflexively increasing neck stiffness as an effective way to reduce impact-induced head rotations and concussion risk.","PeriodicalId":21130,"journal":{"name":"Restorative neurology and neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restorative neurology and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2692-7918.1014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The human head-and-neck has three degrees of rotational freedom – pitch, roll, and yaw. While the evolution of the head-and-neck mobility may have increased the overall fitness of homo sapiens, our head-and-neck mobility may have also introduced some differential vulnerability to injuries in impact-induced head rotations about the pitch, roll, and yaw axes. Methods and Findings: We examined impact-induced head rotations in boxing matches by analyzing videos. Our objective was to seek a quantitative relationship between impact-induced head kinematics and the knockout outcome. For each of the three rotational degrees of freedom, head angular velocities of impact-induced head rotations were significantly higher in knockout hits than in control hits without a knockout (p < 0.02). Knockout thresholds in pitch-roll-yaw measured as impact-induced head angular velocities were anisotropic with the lowest threshold in roll and became progressively higher in yaw and pitch, in that order. Regardless of the pitch-roll-yaw bearing, the velocities of the striking fists in knockout hits were not significantly higher than those in control hits. Conclusions: Accurate prediction of knockout via head kinematics was possible with pitch-roll-yaw information. Impact-induced head kinematics was strongly influenced by neck stiffness, making a case for the utility of reflexively increasing neck stiffness as an effective way to reduce impact-induced head rotations and concussion risk.
期刊介绍:
This interdisciplinary journal publishes papers relating to the plasticity and response of the nervous system to accidental or experimental injuries and their interventions, transplantation, neurodegenerative disorders and experimental strategies to improve regeneration or functional recovery and rehabilitation. Experimental and clinical research papers adopting fresh conceptual approaches are encouraged. The overriding criteria for publication are novelty, significant experimental or clinical relevance and interest to a multidisciplinary audience. Experiments on un-anesthetized animals should conform with the standards for the use of laboratory animals as established by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, US National Academy of Sciences. Experiments in which paralytic agents are used must be justified. Patient identity should be concealed. All manuscripts are sent out for blind peer review to editorial board members or outside reviewers. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience is a member of Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.