Resource-saving in buildings through material substitution: A preliminary study of structural dependencies

Regine Ortlepp
{"title":"Resource-saving in buildings through material substitution: A preliminary study of structural dependencies","authors":"Regine Ortlepp","doi":"10.1002/cend.202000023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Around the world, building stocks are the dominant consumers of mineral resources. Mining activities for the supply of construction materials can lead to conflicts in land use. In order to minimize such sources of conflict, we need improved knowledge of material consumption in the built environment. For this, we can make use of material flow analysis (MFA), which in turn requires the determination of material composition indicators (MCIs). Usually, such indicators are defined for a building type. Currently, there is a lack of research on the impact of material substitution on these MCIs as well as studies on the potential for resource-saving that take technical issues into account. This contribution describes a preliminary study on material substitution in six different reference buildings which compare the bill of materials for structures constructed using standard clay bricks vs potential material substitutes such as hollow, lightweight, or autoclaved aerated concrete blocks. The results show that considerable reductions in material consumption can thereby be achieved for certain parts of the considered buildings. In the future, these effects should be incorporated in the MCIs as key variables for an MFA.</p>","PeriodicalId":100248,"journal":{"name":"Civil Engineering Design","volume":"3 1-2","pages":"13-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cend.202000023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Engineering Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cend.202000023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Around the world, building stocks are the dominant consumers of mineral resources. Mining activities for the supply of construction materials can lead to conflicts in land use. In order to minimize such sources of conflict, we need improved knowledge of material consumption in the built environment. For this, we can make use of material flow analysis (MFA), which in turn requires the determination of material composition indicators (MCIs). Usually, such indicators are defined for a building type. Currently, there is a lack of research on the impact of material substitution on these MCIs as well as studies on the potential for resource-saving that take technical issues into account. This contribution describes a preliminary study on material substitution in six different reference buildings which compare the bill of materials for structures constructed using standard clay bricks vs potential material substitutes such as hollow, lightweight, or autoclaved aerated concrete blocks. The results show that considerable reductions in material consumption can thereby be achieved for certain parts of the considered buildings. In the future, these effects should be incorporated in the MCIs as key variables for an MFA.

Abstract Image

通过材料替代的建筑资源节约:结构依赖关系的初步研究
在世界范围内,建筑库存是矿产资源的主要消费者。为供应建筑材料而进行的采矿活动可能导致土地使用方面的冲突。为了尽量减少这些冲突的来源,我们需要提高对建筑环境中材料消耗的认识。为此,我们可以利用物料流分析(MFA),这反过来又需要确定材料成分指标(MCIs)。通常,这些指标是为建筑类型定义的。目前,缺乏关于材料替代对这些MCIs的影响的研究,也缺乏考虑到技术问题的节约资源潜力的研究。这篇文章描述了对六个不同参考建筑的材料替代的初步研究,比较了使用标准粘土砖与潜在材料替代品(如空心、轻质或蒸压加气混凝土块)建造的结构的材料清单。结果表明,因此可以在考虑的建筑物的某些部分实现相当大的材料消耗的减少。将来,这些影响应该作为MFA的关键变量纳入mci。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信