Sustainability, Development and Biodiversity: Global Theory vs. Brazilian Practice

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Fernanda Monteiro, M. Trombini
{"title":"Sustainability, Development and Biodiversity: Global Theory vs. Brazilian Practice","authors":"Fernanda Monteiro, M. Trombini","doi":"10.1163/21983534-09030002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nSustainable development is more than an agenda, it is a historical construct rooted in modernity. In response to the global theory of what is necessary to achieve biodiversity targets, Brazil, a megadiverse “developing” country from the Global South, gains international attention due to its differentiated role in terms of providing environmental services. To confront global theory and territorialized practice, the article looks at a protected area that overlaps with the lands traditionally occupied by flower-gatherers in the Cerrado, a tropical Savanna ecosystem. On the base of the case study, the dichotomy society/nature and the mobilization strategies of this grassroot movement are discussed in light of disputes surrounding sustainability, appropriation and usage of natural resources. Results show collective actors whose identity is articulated in the collection of native flowers from the rupestrian grasslands are somewhat successful in their struggle to re-signify the meaning given to ecology and sustainability through the production of counter-discourses to the conservationist paradigm.","PeriodicalId":40791,"journal":{"name":"Majalah Kedokteran Bandung-MKB-Bandung Medical Journal","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Majalah Kedokteran Bandung-MKB-Bandung Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/21983534-09030002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sustainable development is more than an agenda, it is a historical construct rooted in modernity. In response to the global theory of what is necessary to achieve biodiversity targets, Brazil, a megadiverse “developing” country from the Global South, gains international attention due to its differentiated role in terms of providing environmental services. To confront global theory and territorialized practice, the article looks at a protected area that overlaps with the lands traditionally occupied by flower-gatherers in the Cerrado, a tropical Savanna ecosystem. On the base of the case study, the dichotomy society/nature and the mobilization strategies of this grassroot movement are discussed in light of disputes surrounding sustainability, appropriation and usage of natural resources. Results show collective actors whose identity is articulated in the collection of native flowers from the rupestrian grasslands are somewhat successful in their struggle to re-signify the meaning given to ecology and sustainability through the production of counter-discourses to the conservationist paradigm.
可持续性、发展和生物多样性:全球理论与巴西实践
可持续发展不仅仅是一个议程,而是植根于现代性的历史建构。作为对实现生物多样性目标所必需的全球理论的回应,巴西,一个来自全球南方的巨型多样性“发展中”国家,因其在提供环境服务方面的差异化作用而获得国际关注。为了对抗全球理论和领土化实践,这篇文章着眼于一个保护区,它与塞拉多热带稀树草原生态系统中传统的采花者所占据的土地重叠。在案例分析的基础上,结合围绕自然资源的可持续性、占用和使用的争议,探讨了社会/自然的二分法及其基层运动的动员策略。结果表明,通过对自然保护主义范式的反话语的生产,集体行动者的身份在鲁佩斯特兰草原的本地鲜花收集中得到了明确表达,他们在努力重新表明赋予生态和可持续性的意义方面取得了一定的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信