Radical Nationalism and Facist Elements in Political Movements in Slovenia Between the Two World Wars.

Boris Mlakar
{"title":"Radical Nationalism and Facist Elements in Political Movements in Slovenia Between the Two World Wars.","authors":"Boris Mlakar","doi":"10.7152/ssj.v31i1.14812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the Second World War, European historians of fascist phenomena mainly focused on Italian Fascism and German Nazism, and justly so. In the last two decades, however, an increasing number of studies have been dedicated to various manifestations of fascism in Eastern European countries. These have only occasionally included the territory of the former Yugoslavia. It was mainly due to the Croatian Ustaša movement that Yugoslavia received notice. To date, several monographs have appeared on the Ustaša. They have also covered various aspects of the socalled Independent State of Croatia. Interest in fascism and radical nationalism on Yugoslav territory grew after the inter-ethnic wars of the 1990s (Hory and Broszat 1964, Scotti 1976, MacDonald 2002). In the collection on fascism in Europe edited by S. J. Wolf in 1968, Yugoslavia was not mentioned at all, whereas P. F. Sugar’s collection three years later contained two papers on fascism in Yugoslavia (Wolf 1968, Sugar 1971). While some studies of fascism mention only the Ustaša movement, the most recent one by Sabrina P. Ramet, briefly present the emergence of fascist movements in other Yugoslav nations, cursorily treating the Slovenes as well (2006: 35–111). A number of otherwise excellent recent studies on Yugoslavia or the Balkans after 1930 (Cox 2007, Tomasevich 2001) concentrate on the Ustaša movement or its leader, Ante Pavelić. This holds true as well for the collection of scholarly papers about the Independent State of Croatia edited by Sabrina Ramet (2007).","PeriodicalId":82261,"journal":{"name":"Papers in Slovene studies","volume":"78 1","pages":"3-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Papers in Slovene studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7152/ssj.v31i1.14812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After the Second World War, European historians of fascist phenomena mainly focused on Italian Fascism and German Nazism, and justly so. In the last two decades, however, an increasing number of studies have been dedicated to various manifestations of fascism in Eastern European countries. These have only occasionally included the territory of the former Yugoslavia. It was mainly due to the Croatian Ustaša movement that Yugoslavia received notice. To date, several monographs have appeared on the Ustaša. They have also covered various aspects of the socalled Independent State of Croatia. Interest in fascism and radical nationalism on Yugoslav territory grew after the inter-ethnic wars of the 1990s (Hory and Broszat 1964, Scotti 1976, MacDonald 2002). In the collection on fascism in Europe edited by S. J. Wolf in 1968, Yugoslavia was not mentioned at all, whereas P. F. Sugar’s collection three years later contained two papers on fascism in Yugoslavia (Wolf 1968, Sugar 1971). While some studies of fascism mention only the Ustaša movement, the most recent one by Sabrina P. Ramet, briefly present the emergence of fascist movements in other Yugoslav nations, cursorily treating the Slovenes as well (2006: 35–111). A number of otherwise excellent recent studies on Yugoslavia or the Balkans after 1930 (Cox 2007, Tomasevich 2001) concentrate on the Ustaša movement or its leader, Ante Pavelić. This holds true as well for the collection of scholarly papers about the Independent State of Croatia edited by Sabrina Ramet (2007).
两次世界大战期间斯洛文尼亚政治运动中的激进民族主义和法西斯分子。
第二次世界大战后,欧洲研究法西斯现象的历史学家主要关注意大利法西斯主义和德国纳粹主义,这是理所当然的。然而,在过去二十年中,越来越多的研究致力于东欧国家法西斯主义的各种表现形式。它们只是偶尔包括前南斯拉夫的领土。南斯拉夫收到通知主要是由于克罗地亚Ustaša运动。到目前为止,已经有几篇专著出现在Ustaša上。它们还涉及所谓克罗地亚独立国的各个方面。在20世纪90年代的种族间战争之后,对南斯拉夫领土上法西斯主义和激进民族主义的兴趣增加了(Hory and Broszat 1964, Scotti 1976, MacDonald 2002)。在S. J. Wolf于1968年编辑的关于欧洲法西斯主义的文集中,南斯拉夫根本没有被提及,而P. F. Sugar在三年后的文集中包含了两篇关于南斯拉夫法西斯主义的论文(Wolf 1968, Sugar 1971)。虽然一些关于法西斯主义的研究只提到Ustaša运动,但萨布丽娜·p·拉梅特(Sabrina P. Ramet)最近的一篇文章简要介绍了其他南斯拉夫国家法西斯运动的出现,也粗略地讨论了斯洛文尼亚(2006:35-111)。最近一些关于1930年后南斯拉夫或巴尔干半岛的优秀研究(Cox 2007, Tomasevich 2001)集中于Ustaša运动或其领导人Ante pavelici。这也适用于Sabrina Ramet(2007)编辑的关于克罗地亚独立国的学术论文集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信