Production of round wood from planted forests and price of pulp and paper and other forestry purposes in southern Brazil

Gustavo Silva Oliveira, R. T. Júnior, Ailson Augusto Loper, Pedro José Steiner Neto, R. Alves
{"title":"Production of round wood from planted forests and price of pulp and paper and other forestry purposes in southern Brazil","authors":"Gustavo Silva Oliveira, R. T. Júnior, Ailson Augusto Loper, Pedro José Steiner Neto, R. Alves","doi":"10.21475/ajcs.21.15.12.p3313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study is to analyze the production of round wood from planted forests and the price of pulp and paper and other forestry purposes in southern Brazil, from 2000 to 2019. In this study, we worked with historical series from secondary data collected from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics IBGE, referring to the produced and traded quantity in forestry (m³), forestry production value (one thousand dollars) and price ($/m³), obtained through the ratio between the production value and the respective produced quantities in each year. The silviculture production value (PV) is a derived variable calculated by the weighted average of quantity and average current price paid to the producer (m³), according to the harvest and commercialization periods of each product. The price evolution (P) was separated according to purpose and obtained through the quotient between the production value and respective quantities produced in each year. The trend models were estimated, in which annual growth rates of the real price and produced quantity were calculated for the two roundwood purposes in the evaluated period. Then, we sought to fit the results according to the possibilities of shift of the supply and demand curves. The results indicate that pulp and paper presented positive rates of produced quantity and price, of 5.8775 and 1.3704, respectively. The nomenclature for other purposes had a positive rate for the produced quantity (4.1929) and a negative rate for price (-0.3203). Thus, logwood for pulp and paper showed a dominant shift in the demand curve to the right, showing a rising market, while for other purposes, there was a dominant shift in supply to the right, corroborating the concept of positive variation in quantity and a negative variation in price. Given these results, it is important to highlight that the study refers to one federative unit in Brazil, which signals the recommendation that other similar studies be carried out in other states to better understand the impact of production and price of these purposes on the Brazilian market","PeriodicalId":10994,"journal":{"name":"December 2021","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"December 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.21.15.12.p3313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study is to analyze the production of round wood from planted forests and the price of pulp and paper and other forestry purposes in southern Brazil, from 2000 to 2019. In this study, we worked with historical series from secondary data collected from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics IBGE, referring to the produced and traded quantity in forestry (m³), forestry production value (one thousand dollars) and price ($/m³), obtained through the ratio between the production value and the respective produced quantities in each year. The silviculture production value (PV) is a derived variable calculated by the weighted average of quantity and average current price paid to the producer (m³), according to the harvest and commercialization periods of each product. The price evolution (P) was separated according to purpose and obtained through the quotient between the production value and respective quantities produced in each year. The trend models were estimated, in which annual growth rates of the real price and produced quantity were calculated for the two roundwood purposes in the evaluated period. Then, we sought to fit the results according to the possibilities of shift of the supply and demand curves. The results indicate that pulp and paper presented positive rates of produced quantity and price, of 5.8775 and 1.3704, respectively. The nomenclature for other purposes had a positive rate for the produced quantity (4.1929) and a negative rate for price (-0.3203). Thus, logwood for pulp and paper showed a dominant shift in the demand curve to the right, showing a rising market, while for other purposes, there was a dominant shift in supply to the right, corroborating the concept of positive variation in quantity and a negative variation in price. Given these results, it is important to highlight that the study refers to one federative unit in Brazil, which signals the recommendation that other similar studies be carried out in other states to better understand the impact of production and price of these purposes on the Brazilian market
巴西南部种植森林的圆木产量和纸浆、纸张及其他林业用途的价格
该研究的目的是分析2000年至2019年巴西南部人工林圆木的产量以及纸浆、纸张和其他林业用途的价格。在本研究中,我们使用了巴西地理与统计研究所(IBGE)收集的二手数据的历史序列,参考了林业的生产和贸易量(m³),林业产值(千美元)和价格(美元/m³),通过每年的产值与各自的产量之比得到。造林产值(PV)是一个衍生变量,根据每种产品的收获和商业化周期,将数量和支付给生产者的平均当前价格(m³)加权平均计算得出。价格演变(P)按目的分离,通过每年的产值与各自的产量之商得到。对趋势模型进行了估计,其中计算了两种圆木用途在评估期间的实际价格和产量的年增长率。然后,我们试图根据供需曲线移动的可能性来拟合结果。结果表明,纸浆和纸张的产量和价格阳性率分别为5.8775和1.3704。其他用途的命名法对生产数量(4.1929)有正的比率,对价格(-0.3203)有负的比率。因此,用于纸浆和造纸的原木在需求曲线上主要向右移动,表明市场在上升,而用于其他用途的原木在供应曲线上主要向右移动,证实了数量正变化和价格负变化的概念。鉴于这些结果,必须强调的是,该研究涉及巴西的一个联邦单位,这表明建议在其他州进行其他类似的研究,以更好地了解这些用途的生产和价格对巴西市场的影响
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信