Adaptabilitas dan Stabilitas Hasil Empat Belas Genotip Padi Gogo Pada Tujuh Lokasi Menggunakan AMMI

Eko Binnaryo Mei Adi, Heru Wibowo, S. Indrayani, Y. Sulistiyowati, Yuliana Galih Dyan Anggraheni, Ambar Yuswi Perdani, Fiqolbi Nuro, Y. B. Paradisa, Puspita Deswina, E. S. Mulyaningsih, Dody Priadi
{"title":"Adaptabilitas dan Stabilitas Hasil Empat Belas Genotip Padi Gogo Pada Tujuh Lokasi Menggunakan AMMI","authors":"Eko Binnaryo Mei Adi, Heru Wibowo, S. Indrayani, Y. Sulistiyowati, Yuliana Galih Dyan Anggraheni, Ambar Yuswi Perdani, Fiqolbi Nuro, Y. B. Paradisa, Puspita Deswina, E. S. Mulyaningsih, Dody Priadi","doi":"10.15408/kauniyah.v16i1.22953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" AbstrakPengujian stabilitas genotip merupakan hal yang penting dalam perakitan varietas padi gogo. Metode pengujian yang sering dilakukan menggunakan analisis ANOVA gabungan yang harus memenuhi normalitas data dan homogenitas ragam. Terkadang data yang diperoleh tidak dapat memenuhi asumsi, sehingga diperlukan analisis alternatif menggunakan metode kualitatif, yaitu Additive Main Effect and Main Interaction (AMMI). Penelitian menggunakan empat belas genotip padi gogo pada tujuh lokasi, dengan rancangan percobaan rancangan acak kelompok. Hasil analisis AMMI1 menunjukkan bahwa didapatkan tujuh genotip dengan nilai rerata produksi di atas rata-rata umum yaitu G29, G31, G33, G34, G35, G37, dan G42 (Inpago 9). Inpago 9 sebagai genotip dengan rata-rata produksi tertinggi di seluruh lokasi. Hasil analisis AMMI2 didapatkan genotip dengan kemampuan adaptasi spesifik lokasi dan beradaptasi pada seluruh lokasi. Dua genotip beradaptasi baik di lokasi Probolinggo yaitu G39 dan G40, sedangkan G29 dan G41 di lokasi Sukadana. Sementara genotip stabil didapatkan tiga genotip yaitu G31, G34, dan G36, namun genotip G36 termasuk genotip dengan produktivitas dibawah rerata genotip pada seluruh lokasi.AbstractGenotype stability is an important factor for varieties development in upland rice. The method for testing stability trial using combine ANOVA with several requirements such as the normality and homogeneity of variance of the data. Sometime to satisfy the assumptions from the acquiring data was not match, so that needed the alternate analysis using qualitative method for stability genotype testing. One of the method is Additive Main Effect and Main Interaction (AMMI). The research was used fourteen upland genotype and seven locations. The result for AMMI1 showed that seven genotype which is have average above the general average are G29, G31, G33, G34, G35, G37, and G42 (Inpago 9). The highest production is achieving by Inpago 9 varieties. While in AMMI2 have two different result. The first result is genotype with specific adaptation and genotype with has general adaptability. Genotype with specific adaptation are G39 and G40 in Probolinggo while G29 and G41 in Sukadana. The second result was genotype with general adaptability or have a good stability are G31, G34, and G36, but for genotype G36 has a poor productivity because the average is below the general average. The result from stability analysis in AMMI2 biplot showed the stability of G31 and G34 has a good stability and higher yield above the average of genotype in all location.","PeriodicalId":31088,"journal":{"name":"AlKauniyah Jurnal Biologi","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AlKauniyah Jurnal Biologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/kauniyah.v16i1.22953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

 AbstrakPengujian stabilitas genotip merupakan hal yang penting dalam perakitan varietas padi gogo. Metode pengujian yang sering dilakukan menggunakan analisis ANOVA gabungan yang harus memenuhi normalitas data dan homogenitas ragam. Terkadang data yang diperoleh tidak dapat memenuhi asumsi, sehingga diperlukan analisis alternatif menggunakan metode kualitatif, yaitu Additive Main Effect and Main Interaction (AMMI). Penelitian menggunakan empat belas genotip padi gogo pada tujuh lokasi, dengan rancangan percobaan rancangan acak kelompok. Hasil analisis AMMI1 menunjukkan bahwa didapatkan tujuh genotip dengan nilai rerata produksi di atas rata-rata umum yaitu G29, G31, G33, G34, G35, G37, dan G42 (Inpago 9). Inpago 9 sebagai genotip dengan rata-rata produksi tertinggi di seluruh lokasi. Hasil analisis AMMI2 didapatkan genotip dengan kemampuan adaptasi spesifik lokasi dan beradaptasi pada seluruh lokasi. Dua genotip beradaptasi baik di lokasi Probolinggo yaitu G39 dan G40, sedangkan G29 dan G41 di lokasi Sukadana. Sementara genotip stabil didapatkan tiga genotip yaitu G31, G34, dan G36, namun genotip G36 termasuk genotip dengan produktivitas dibawah rerata genotip pada seluruh lokasi.AbstractGenotype stability is an important factor for varieties development in upland rice. The method for testing stability trial using combine ANOVA with several requirements such as the normality and homogeneity of variance of the data. Sometime to satisfy the assumptions from the acquiring data was not match, so that needed the alternate analysis using qualitative method for stability genotype testing. One of the method is Additive Main Effect and Main Interaction (AMMI). The research was used fourteen upland genotype and seven locations. The result for AMMI1 showed that seven genotype which is have average above the general average are G29, G31, G33, G34, G35, G37, and G42 (Inpago 9). The highest production is achieving by Inpago 9 varieties. While in AMMI2 have two different result. The first result is genotype with specific adaptation and genotype with has general adaptability. Genotype with specific adaptation are G39 and G40 in Probolinggo while G29 and G41 in Sukadana. The second result was genotype with general adaptability or have a good stability are G31, G34, and G36, but for genotype G36 has a poor productivity because the average is below the general average. The result from stability analysis in AMMI2 biplot showed the stability of G31 and G34 has a good stability and higher yield above the average of genotype in all location.
适应能力和稳定性由14个Gogo基因组位在7个地点使用AMMI
基因组稳定性试验是gogo水稻品种组合的重要组成部分。常用的测试方法采用了一种合成的反常分析,该分析必须符合数据的正常性和多样性。有时所获得的数据不符合这个假设,因此需要用一种定性方法来进行替代分析。该研究在7个地点使用了14种果戈水稻基因组,并设计了一个随机设计小组。AMMI1分析表明,它的生产平均成绩超过了G29、G31、G33、G34、G35、G37和G42 (Inpago 9),而Inpago 9是整个地区平均产量最高的。AMMI2的分析获得了具有特定适应环境和适应整个环境的基因组学能力。两个基因组在Probolinggo的G39和G40位置适应得很好,而G29和G41在Sukadana位置。虽然稳定的基因组学获得了三种G31, G34和G36,但G36的基因组学包括整个地区基因组学平均生产力以下的基因组学。抽象基因稳定是upland赖斯变量发展的重要因素。测试稳定试验的方法是使用一种与某些要求相似的方法,即数据可变性的正常性和均匀性。有时需要对数据验证的结果感到满意,所以需要使用稳定基因测试的标准方法进行替代分析。一种方法增加了效果和相互作用。这项研究使用了14种植物基因组和7种区域。AMMI1的建议是,平均每个平均的七个基因都是G29、G31、G33、G34、G35、G37和G42 (Inpago 9)。虽然在AMMI2有两个不同的建议。第一个预测是具有特别适配器和一般适配器的基因组。特别适应基因组是G39 G40在Probolinggo G29和G41在Sukadana。第二种结果是普通适性或良好稳定G31 G34 G36的基因基AMMI2中对稳定分析的结果表明,G31和G34的稳定在所有位置都得到了很好的稳定和更高的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信