¿POR QUÉ SE USA 'RECURSION' CUANDO SE QUIERE SIGNIFICAR AUTO-INCLUSIÓN'?: CLARIFICACIONES CONCEPTUALES SOBRE LA RECURSIÓN EN EL PROGRAMA CHOMSKIANO

IF 0.6 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
S. Mota
{"title":"¿POR QUÉ SE USA 'RECURSION' CUANDO SE QUIERE SIGNIFICAR AUTO-INCLUSIÓN'?: CLARIFICACIONES CONCEPTUALES SOBRE LA RECURSIÓN EN EL PROGRAMA CHOMSKIANO","authors":"S. Mota","doi":"10.4067/S0718-48832015000200008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolEste trabajo pretende presentar de forma clara y concisa la (doble) disociacion conceptual entre ‘recursion’ y ‘auto-inclusion’ tan frecuentemente confundidos en la literatura espe-cializada. Se mostrara que la recursion no implica auto-inclusion y que la auto-inclusion no implica tampoco recursion. El ambito de discusion sera el programa chomskiano, dado que ha sido uno de los ambitos donde la recursion ha sido peor interpretada, fundamen-talmente por sus criticos. EnglishThis work intends to show in a clear and concise way that there is a double conceptual dissociation between ‘recursion’ and ‘self-embedding’, two terms which are frequently conflated in the specialized literature. It will show that recursion does not imply self-embedding and that self-embedding does not imply recursion either. The discussion will be focused on the Chomskyan program, since this has been one particular domain where recursion has been worse understood, especially by Chomsky’s critics.","PeriodicalId":35168,"journal":{"name":"RLA","volume":"291 1","pages":"171-191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RLA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48832015000200008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

espanolEste trabajo pretende presentar de forma clara y concisa la (doble) disociacion conceptual entre ‘recursion’ y ‘auto-inclusion’ tan frecuentemente confundidos en la literatura espe-cializada. Se mostrara que la recursion no implica auto-inclusion y que la auto-inclusion no implica tampoco recursion. El ambito de discusion sera el programa chomskiano, dado que ha sido uno de los ambitos donde la recursion ha sido peor interpretada, fundamen-talmente por sus criticos. EnglishThis work intends to show in a clear and concise way that there is a double conceptual dissociation between ‘recursion’ and ‘self-embedding’, two terms which are frequently conflated in the specialized literature. It will show that recursion does not imply self-embedding and that self-embedding does not imply recursion either. The discussion will be focused on the Chomskyan program, since this has been one particular domain where recursion has been worse understood, especially by Chomsky’s critics.
为什么要用“递归”来表示自我包含?:乔姆斯基程序中递归的概念澄清
西班牙语的翻译是通过概念中心的“递归”和“自动包含”,而不是经常的“混淆”和特殊的文献。没有隐含的自动包含,也没有隐含的tampoco递归。讨论的目标是一个项目,讨论的目标是一个项目,讨论的目标是一个项目,讨论的目标是一个项目,讨论的目标是一个项目,讨论的目标是一个项目,讨论的目标是一个项目,讨论的目标是一个项目,讨论的目标是一个项目。这项工作旨在以一种清晰而简洁的方式表明,在“递归”和“自嵌入”之间存在双重概念分离,这两个术语在专业文献中经常被混为一谈。它将表明递归并不意味着自嵌入,自嵌入也不意味着递归。讨论将集中在乔姆斯基的程序上,因为这是一个特别的领域,尤其是乔姆斯基的批评者对递归的理解更差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RLA
RLA Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信