Thalassokratia: un concetto, molti nomi

E. Bianco
{"title":"Thalassokratia: un concetto, molti nomi","authors":"E. Bianco","doi":"10.13135/2039-4985/1908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of thalassocracy, although problematic and difficult to define, is commonly used by modern authors, but if we examine ancient sources, we note both an extraordinary shortage of occurrences of this word and a considerable gap between the idea of thalassokratia that appears in the authors of the classical era, which often seems to correspond to a power of the sea in more or less local area, and a broader concept that emerges later, as a political category considered in its development. Through an analysis of occurrences, in this essay we try to oppose the communis opinio that both the term and the concept must trace back to the Ionian area, emphasizing instead that this category may have better been developed in Attica during the Athenian Empire, when reflections about the hegemonic phenomenon and its antecedents could make sense and take hold. Herodotus, Pseudo-Xenophon and Thucydides could all bear witness to the existence of a highly developed debate in the early years of the Peloponnesian War, using the word thalassokratia with double sigma, perhaps because it was perceived as archaic or refined, rather than as typically Ionic. Whatever the origin of the word may be, however, it is not thoroughly used by the authors of classical prose, who preferred other options for the definition of this fundamental concept.","PeriodicalId":30377,"journal":{"name":"Historika Studi di Storia Greca e Romana","volume":"21 1","pages":"97-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historika Studi di Storia Greca e Romana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13135/2039-4985/1908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of thalassocracy, although problematic and difficult to define, is commonly used by modern authors, but if we examine ancient sources, we note both an extraordinary shortage of occurrences of this word and a considerable gap between the idea of thalassokratia that appears in the authors of the classical era, which often seems to correspond to a power of the sea in more or less local area, and a broader concept that emerges later, as a political category considered in its development. Through an analysis of occurrences, in this essay we try to oppose the communis opinio that both the term and the concept must trace back to the Ionian area, emphasizing instead that this category may have better been developed in Attica during the Athenian Empire, when reflections about the hegemonic phenomenon and its antecedents could make sense and take hold. Herodotus, Pseudo-Xenophon and Thucydides could all bear witness to the existence of a highly developed debate in the early years of the Peloponnesian War, using the word thalassokratia with double sigma, perhaps because it was perceived as archaic or refined, rather than as typically Ionic. Whatever the origin of the word may be, however, it is not thoroughly used by the authors of classical prose, who preferred other options for the definition of this fundamental concept.
一个概念,很多名字
“海地权”这个概念虽然有问题,也很难定义,但现代作者通常使用这个词,但如果我们检查古代资料,我们会注意到这个词出现的频率非常低,而且在古典时代的作者中出现的“海地权”概念与后来出现的更广泛的概念之间存在相当大的差距,“海地权”似乎经常对应于或多或少局部地区的海洋力量。作为一个政治范畴在其发展过程中被考虑。通过对事件的分析,在本文中,我们试图反对共产主义者的观点,即这个术语和概念都必须追溯到爱奥尼亚地区,相反,我们强调这一范畴可能在雅典帝国时期的阿提卡得到了更好的发展,那时对霸权现象及其前因的反思可能是有意义的。希罗多德、假色诺芬和修昔底德都可以见证伯罗奔尼撒战争早期存在的一场高度发展的辩论,他们使用了“thalassokratia”这个词和两个sigma,也许是因为它被认为是古老或精致的,而不是典型的爱奥尼亚。然而,不管这个词的起源是什么,古典散文的作者们并没有完全使用它,他们更喜欢用其他的方法来定义这个基本概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信