Are You in the Green? The Economic Impact of Carbon-Conscious Choices on Project Development Planning

D. Choe, J. Whitworth, Ashutosh Kak, Genevieve Bisset
{"title":"Are You in the Green? The Economic Impact of Carbon-Conscious Choices on Project Development Planning","authors":"D. Choe, J. Whitworth, Ashutosh Kak, Genevieve Bisset","doi":"10.4043/30947-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions target set by UNFCCC Paris Accord in 2016 will emerge as a new value driver to project development planning that has the potential to degrade the viability of future offshore oil and gas projects. Integration of GHG emissions and legislated carbon price as new decision drivers to project decision-making will require an in-depth understanding on the overall economic impact of carbon-conscious choices. In this light, the purpose of this paper is to present the impact of such choices on project development planning and implications for Decision Quality (DQ).\n The case study presents a comparative assessment of total GHG emissions and comparative project economics for a Greenfield project, considering four development concepts: a Reference Case with a \"traditional\" offshore facility and three hypothetical cases, each of which are defined, evaluated, and compared against the Reference Case. Development of each case is discussed and created to support decision-making during project development planning. The paper presents an economic comparison to demonstrate the importance of including a carbon assessment early in project development planning to assure a thorough concept evaluation. It also demonstrates how a clear outlook on the annual GHG intensity over project life can be vital, for project sanction and mitigation of high carbon cost penalties in the future regulatory landscape.\n Early understanding of risks associated with carbon price and regulatory enforcement can potentially change how industries analyze the viability of their projects/assets. The paper demonstrates the importance of assessing carbon-conscious options early in the project development planning stage, and how this helps developers to navigate the risks and opportunities in the drive to a lower-carbon society.","PeriodicalId":11184,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, August 18, 2021","volume":"391 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, August 18, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/30947-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions target set by UNFCCC Paris Accord in 2016 will emerge as a new value driver to project development planning that has the potential to degrade the viability of future offshore oil and gas projects. Integration of GHG emissions and legislated carbon price as new decision drivers to project decision-making will require an in-depth understanding on the overall economic impact of carbon-conscious choices. In this light, the purpose of this paper is to present the impact of such choices on project development planning and implications for Decision Quality (DQ). The case study presents a comparative assessment of total GHG emissions and comparative project economics for a Greenfield project, considering four development concepts: a Reference Case with a "traditional" offshore facility and three hypothetical cases, each of which are defined, evaluated, and compared against the Reference Case. Development of each case is discussed and created to support decision-making during project development planning. The paper presents an economic comparison to demonstrate the importance of including a carbon assessment early in project development planning to assure a thorough concept evaluation. It also demonstrates how a clear outlook on the annual GHG intensity over project life can be vital, for project sanction and mitigation of high carbon cost penalties in the future regulatory landscape. Early understanding of risks associated with carbon price and regulatory enforcement can potentially change how industries analyze the viability of their projects/assets. The paper demonstrates the importance of assessing carbon-conscious options early in the project development planning stage, and how this helps developers to navigate the risks and opportunities in the drive to a lower-carbon society.
你是绿色的吗?碳意识选择对项目发展规划的经济影响
2016年《联合国气候变化框架公约》(UNFCCC)巴黎协议设定的温室气体(GHG)排放目标将成为项目开发规划的一个新的价值驱动因素,这可能会降低未来海上油气项目的可行性。将温室气体排放和法定碳价整合为项目决策的新决策驱动因素,需要深入了解碳意识选择的整体经济影响。在这种情况下,本文的目的是提出这些选择对项目开发规划的影响以及对决策质量(DQ)的影响。本案例研究对一个绿地项目的温室气体排放总量和项目经济性进行了比较评估,考虑了四个开发概念:一个“传统”海上设施的参考案例和三个假设案例,每个案例都被定义、评估并与参考案例进行了比较。讨论和创建每个案例的发展,以支持项目开发规划期间的决策。本文提出了一个经济比较,以证明在项目开发规划早期包括碳评估以确保彻底的概念评估的重要性。它还表明,在未来的监管环境中,对项目生命周期内年度温室气体强度的明确展望对于项目制裁和减轻高碳成本处罚至关重要。尽早了解与碳价格和监管执法相关的风险,可能会改变行业分析其项目/资产可行性的方式。本文展示了在项目开发规划阶段早期评估碳意识选择的重要性,以及这如何帮助开发商在推动低碳社会的过程中把握风险和机遇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信