Más allá del urbanismo situacionista. Acerca de New Babylon de Constant

IF 0.1 0 ART

Quintana-Revista do Departamento de Historia da Arte Pub Date : 2018-12-29 DOI:10.15304/qui.16.3610

Juan Ignacio Arias Krause, Patricio Alfonso Landaeta Mardones, Alexis Candia-Cáceres

引用次数: 0

Abstract

La propuesta urbanística del situacionismo constituye una apuesta teórico-práctica enfrentada a la planificación del urbanismo moderno que consolida el “aislamiento colectivo” y la circulación para el consumo como matriz de la vida urbana. Contra ello los situacionistas insisten en la necesidad de apropiarnos, como individuos libres, del condicionamiento que históricamente habría puesto en juego la arquitectura y el urbanismo funcionalista. New Babylon, proyecto de Constant Nieuwenhuys, nos ofrece una síntesis de tales ideas en el diseño de un espacio urbano orientado a la creación colectiva de un “lugar común”.

查看原文本刊更多论文

超越情境主义城市主义。关于Constant的新巴比伦

情境主义的城市规划是对现代城市规划的理论和实践挑战，它巩固了“集体孤立”和消费循环作为城市生活的矩阵。相反，情境主义者坚持认为，作为自由的个体，我们需要适应功能主义建筑和城市主义在历史上发挥作用的条件。Constant Nieuwenhuys的新巴比伦项目在城市空间的设计中提供了这些想法的综合，旨在集体创造一个“共同的地方”。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Quintana-Revista do Departamento de Historia da Arte ART-

CiteScore

0.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： QUINTANA is a journal about the history of art, issued annually, which publishes original research papers about any of the specialities related to the Arts, including interdisciplinary approaches that enrich their study. The publication of research papers is structured in two sections: the first one -SUBJECT- is of a monographic character, and its content is planned beforehand by the Editorial Board, who invites well-known specialists in the chosen theme, whilst the second one -ARTICLES- is open to contributions about any theme. The papers which are presented in the ARTICLES section will be subjected to assessment using a double-blind review process with anonymity for both authors and reviewers (peer-review process). The journal will use two reviewers, members of the Scientific Committee or academic experts, to assess each article received, and will resort to a third reviewer in the case of discrepancy. The articles which are finally published will include reception and acceptance dates. The journal’s Director and the Editorial Board will have ultimate responsibility for the selection process, and will communicate the editorial decisions to the authors.