Safety and health at work as fundamental rights: A comparative-historical study of the ILO's strategy of realistic vigilance

IF 2.8 4区管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS

International Labour Review Pub Date : 2023-06-23 DOI:10.1111/ilr.12401

Jeffrey HILGERT

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is a comparative-historical study of ILO action on occupational safety and health (OSH) as fundamental rights. In the two decades following the adoption of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the ILO used a realist lens and prioritized the idea that OSH were dependent upon economic preconditions for their protection. This history is revisited in the light of the new complex of global health uncertainty and the addition of OSH to the framework of fundamental principles and rights at work. The analysis highlights the applicability of a realistic vigilance approach to the ILO's current work on OSH.

查看原文本刊更多论文

作为基本权利的工作安全与健康：国际劳工组织现实警觉战略的历史比较研究

本文对国际劳工组织将职业安全与健康（OSH）作为基本权利的行动进行了历史比较研究。在《经济、社会、文化权利国际公约》通过后的二十年里，国际劳工组织采用了现实主义的视角，优先考虑职业安全与健康的保护取决于经济前提的观点。鉴于全球健康不确定性的新复杂性以及职业安全和健康被纳入工作场所基本原则和权利框架，我们重新审视了这段历史。分析强调了现实警惕方法对国际劳工组织当前职业安全和健康工作的适用性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Labour Review Multiple-

CiteScore

4.30

自引率

20.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The International Labour Review is the world"s leading multidisciplinary journal of labour market institutions and economics. Its aim is to advance academic research and inform policy debate and decision-making in these fields by bringing together the original thinking of lawyers, economists, sociologists, political scientists and industrial relations specialists on a broad range of labour market policy and social protection concerns. The International Labour Review also features concise reports on current developments considered to be of particular interest to those working in these fields and reviews of recent major publications. It is committed to an editorial policy that combines accessibility with rigorous, insightful analysis and the highest scholarly standards.