Comparative left ventricular functional and neurohumoral effects of chronic treatment with carvedilol versus metoprolol in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.

K. Hirooka, Y. Yasumura, Y. Ishida, A. Hanatani, S. Nakatani, K. Komamura, M. Hori, M. Yamagishi, K. Miyatake
{"title":"Comparative left ventricular functional and neurohumoral effects of chronic treatment with carvedilol versus metoprolol in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.","authors":"K. Hirooka, Y. Yasumura, Y. Ishida, A. Hanatani, S. Nakatani, K. Komamura, M. Hori, M. Yamagishi, K. Miyatake","doi":"10.1253/JCJ.65.931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The efficacy of treating dilated cardiomyopathy with metoprolol was compared with that of carvedilol. Metoprolol was administered to 29 patients, and carvedilol to 62. Patients who could not be dosed with up to 40 mg daily of metoprolol or 20 mg daily of carvedilol were defined as intolerant. As well as the tolerability of these beta-blockers, the effects on left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVDd), fractional shortening (FS), plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentrations, the delayed heart and mediastinum (H/M) ratio determined from metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging were compared. Drug intolerance occurred in 24% of patients in the metoprolol group and 19% in the carvedilol group. Among the drug-tolerant patients, LVDd, FS and plasma BNP concentration improved in both groups and to the same degree. Only 25% of drug-tolerant patients in the metoprolol group had a delayed H/M ratio below 1.9 compared with 57% in the carvedilol group. Both metoprolol and carvedilol, when tolerated, improve cardiac function and neurohumoral factors to the same degree. However, carvedilol is preferable to metoprolol for patients with a low delayed H/M ratio.","PeriodicalId":14544,"journal":{"name":"Japanese circulation journal","volume":"26 1","pages":"931-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese circulation journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/JCJ.65.931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

The efficacy of treating dilated cardiomyopathy with metoprolol was compared with that of carvedilol. Metoprolol was administered to 29 patients, and carvedilol to 62. Patients who could not be dosed with up to 40 mg daily of metoprolol or 20 mg daily of carvedilol were defined as intolerant. As well as the tolerability of these beta-blockers, the effects on left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVDd), fractional shortening (FS), plasma atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentrations, the delayed heart and mediastinum (H/M) ratio determined from metaiodobenzylguanidine imaging were compared. Drug intolerance occurred in 24% of patients in the metoprolol group and 19% in the carvedilol group. Among the drug-tolerant patients, LVDd, FS and plasma BNP concentration improved in both groups and to the same degree. Only 25% of drug-tolerant patients in the metoprolol group had a delayed H/M ratio below 1.9 compared with 57% in the carvedilol group. Both metoprolol and carvedilol, when tolerated, improve cardiac function and neurohumoral factors to the same degree. However, carvedilol is preferable to metoprolol for patients with a low delayed H/M ratio.
卡维地洛与美托洛尔慢性治疗扩张型心肌病患者左心室功能和神经体液效应的比较
比较美托洛尔与卡维地洛治疗扩张型心肌病的疗效。29例给予美托洛尔,62例给予卡维地洛。不能给予每日40毫克美托洛尔或每日20毫克卡维地洛的患者被定义为不耐受。比较两种受体阻滞剂对左心室舒张末期尺寸(LVDd)、缩短分数(FS)、血浆心房钠肽(ANP)和脑钠肽(BNP)浓度、经甲氧苄胍显像测定的心脏和纵隔延迟(H/M)比的影响。美托洛尔组和卡维地洛组分别有24%和19%的患者出现药物不耐受。在耐药患者中,两组LVDd、FS和血浆BNP浓度改善程度相同。美托洛尔组只有25%的耐药患者延迟H/M比低于1.9,而卡维地洛组为57%。美托洛尔和卡维地洛在耐受时,对心功能和神经体液因子的改善程度相同。然而,对于延迟性H/M比低的患者,卡维地洛优于美托洛尔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信