The Road to Cystectomy: Who, When and Why?

James W.F. Catto, Derek J. Rosario
{"title":"The Road to Cystectomy: Who, When and Why?","authors":"James W.F. Catto,&nbsp;Derek J. Rosario","doi":"10.1016/j.euus.2005.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives:</h3><p>Bladder cancer is the fifth most common solid malignancy amongst men in the western world. Around 30% of newly diagnosed patients will eventually die from the disease. Radical treatment with curative intent is the best option for patients with invasive bladder cancer. Cystectomy and urinary diversion represents a time-tested robust approach to treating this disease. Here we review the current indications for cystectomy and staging methods for transitional cell carcinoma (TCC).</p></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><p>We conducted a search of the current literature to evaluate the evidence for the indications for cystectomy and the staging of TCC of the urinary bladder.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>Radical cystectomy is usually performed for either invasive or high risk superficial bladder cancer. The outcome is dependent on the pathological stage of tumour at cystectomy. Whilst novel molecular staging methods are in development, current staging is by clinical, pathological and radiological methods. There is a recognised risk of either over- or under- staging the disease using current imaging techniques.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>The indications for radical cystectomy are changing with more emphasis on surgery for high-risk superficial disease. Better stratification of superficial disease has allowed the identification of such high risk cancers. It is likely that advances in molecular diagnosis and staging will come through to clinical practice in the near future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100385,"journal":{"name":"EAU Update Series","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 118-128"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.euus.2005.07.001","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EAU Update Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570912405000280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Objectives:

Bladder cancer is the fifth most common solid malignancy amongst men in the western world. Around 30% of newly diagnosed patients will eventually die from the disease. Radical treatment with curative intent is the best option for patients with invasive bladder cancer. Cystectomy and urinary diversion represents a time-tested robust approach to treating this disease. Here we review the current indications for cystectomy and staging methods for transitional cell carcinoma (TCC).

Methods:

We conducted a search of the current literature to evaluate the evidence for the indications for cystectomy and the staging of TCC of the urinary bladder.

Results:

Radical cystectomy is usually performed for either invasive or high risk superficial bladder cancer. The outcome is dependent on the pathological stage of tumour at cystectomy. Whilst novel molecular staging methods are in development, current staging is by clinical, pathological and radiological methods. There is a recognised risk of either over- or under- staging the disease using current imaging techniques.

Conclusion:

The indications for radical cystectomy are changing with more emphasis on surgery for high-risk superficial disease. Better stratification of superficial disease has allowed the identification of such high risk cancers. It is likely that advances in molecular diagnosis and staging will come through to clinical practice in the near future.

膀胱切除术之路:谁,何时,为什么?
目的:膀胱癌是西方男性第五大常见实体恶性肿瘤。大约30%的新确诊患者最终会死于这种疾病。根治性治疗是侵袭性膀胱癌患者的最佳选择。膀胱切除术和尿转移是一种久经考验的治疗此病的有效方法。在这里,我们回顾目前膀胱切除术的适应症和分期方法的移行细胞癌(TCC)。方法:我们对现有文献进行了检索,以评估膀胱切除术的适应症和膀胱TCC的分期。结果:浸润性或高危浅表性膀胱癌均行根治性膀胱切除术。结果取决于膀胱切除术时肿瘤的病理分期。虽然新的分子分期方法正在开发中,但目前的分期是通过临床、病理和放射学方法进行的。使用当前的成像技术,存在疾病分期过高或过低的公认风险。结论:根治性膀胱切除术的适应症正在发生变化,越来越重视高危浅表疾病的手术治疗。对浅表疾病进行更好的分层,可以识别这类高风险癌症。在不久的将来,分子诊断和分期的进展很可能会应用于临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信