„Młody” Abramowski i kwestia kobieca. Część I: Historia kobiet. Rekonstrukcja

Dorota Sepczyńska
{"title":"„Młody” Abramowski i kwestia kobieca. Część I: Historia kobiet. Rekonstrukcja","authors":"Dorota Sepczyńska","doi":"10.35757/stp.2022.50.3.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of the series of articles is Edward Abramowski’s early thought as expressed in his collected works written up to 1896. It focuses on the following questions: Did Abramowski notice the asymmetry in the positions of men and women? Did he consider it necessary to maintain the gender status quo or to liberate women?The first article reconstructs, in the spirit of literal exegesis, what Abramowski wrote about the situation of women throughout history. The second article considers why Abramowski took this and not another position, and its interpretation is based on an analysis of the external determinants of Abramowski’s thought. The third article explains the meaning and function of Abramowski’s view in his time and distinguishes its supra-historical content.The following arguments support the legitimacy of separating reconstruction from interpretation. Reconstruction (Part I) provides a basis for verifying theses and reasons that appear in interpretations (Parts II and III). None of the interpretations ends (Parts II and III) with the same knowledge that initiates it (Part I). Besides, the results of the two interpretations (Parts II and III) do not coincide. It is also important that the issues discussed in the articles are controversial. Abramowski is a leading fi gure in the history of the Polish socialist movement, Polish philosophy, sociology and psychology. He polarises the world of science but outside it, some circles also perceive him as a positive fi gure, while others as a negative one. The same applies to attitudes to the exploitation and liberation of women. Additionally, ‘young’ Abramowski is surprising, while his story about inter-sex relations is not predictable or obvious.","PeriodicalId":34824,"journal":{"name":"Srodkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne","volume":"505 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Srodkowoeuropejskie Studia Polityczne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35757/stp.2022.50.3.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of the series of articles is Edward Abramowski’s early thought as expressed in his collected works written up to 1896. It focuses on the following questions: Did Abramowski notice the asymmetry in the positions of men and women? Did he consider it necessary to maintain the gender status quo or to liberate women?The first article reconstructs, in the spirit of literal exegesis, what Abramowski wrote about the situation of women throughout history. The second article considers why Abramowski took this and not another position, and its interpretation is based on an analysis of the external determinants of Abramowski’s thought. The third article explains the meaning and function of Abramowski’s view in his time and distinguishes its supra-historical content.The following arguments support the legitimacy of separating reconstruction from interpretation. Reconstruction (Part I) provides a basis for verifying theses and reasons that appear in interpretations (Parts II and III). None of the interpretations ends (Parts II and III) with the same knowledge that initiates it (Part I). Besides, the results of the two interpretations (Parts II and III) do not coincide. It is also important that the issues discussed in the articles are controversial. Abramowski is a leading fi gure in the history of the Polish socialist movement, Polish philosophy, sociology and psychology. He polarises the world of science but outside it, some circles also perceive him as a positive fi gure, while others as a negative one. The same applies to attitudes to the exploitation and liberation of women. Additionally, ‘young’ Abramowski is surprising, while his story about inter-sex relations is not predictable or obvious.
这一系列文章的主题是爱德华·阿布拉莫夫斯基的早期思想,表达在他的作品集写到1896年。它主要关注以下问题:Abramowski是否注意到男性和女性位置的不对称?他认为有必要维持性别现状还是解放妇女?第一篇文章,本着字面解经的精神,重建了阿布拉莫夫斯基所写的关于女性在历史上的处境。第二篇文章考虑了为什么阿布拉莫夫斯基采取了这种立场,而不是另一种立场,其解释是基于对阿布拉莫夫斯基思想的外部决定因素的分析。第三部分解释了阿布拉莫夫斯基的观点在他那个时代的意义和作用,并对其超历史的内容进行了辨析。以下论点支持将重建与解释分开的合法性。重构(第一部分)为验证解释(第二部分和第三部分)中出现的论点和理由提供了基础。没有任何一种解释(第二部分和第三部分)的结束知识与开始解释(第一部分)的知识相同。此外,两种解释(第二部分和第三部分)的结果也不一致。同样重要的是,文章中讨论的问题是有争议的。阿布拉莫夫斯基是波兰社会主义运动史、波兰哲学、社会学和心理学的领军人物。他使科学界两极分化,但在科学界之外,一些圈子也认为他是一个积极的人物,而另一些圈子则认为他是一个消极的人物。对剥削和解放妇女的态度也是如此。此外,“年轻的”阿布拉莫夫斯基令人惊讶,而他关于两性关系的故事既不可预测也不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书