Stanislavsky’s method and some conceptual echoes in Russian culture

IF 0.2 0 THEATER
S. Panov, S. Ivashkin
{"title":"Stanislavsky’s method and some conceptual echoes in Russian culture","authors":"S. Panov, S. Ivashkin","doi":"10.1080/20567790.2020.1860161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Konstantin Stanislavsky created his artistic method of psychological symbolism, trying to overcome the legacy of the socio-typological theatre of the nineteenth century, where the actors’ internal resources were aimed at reproducing recognizable social reflexes of consciousness. Alexander Ostrovsky`s theatre consolidated this tradition in Russian theatrical culture, offering a powerful ensemble of dramatic characters and typical situations of Russian life. The theatre production becomes a continuous discovery of the author’s intention by the director, not a simple presentation of social types. The truth of life, the manifestation of essence as an identity in all changes of action, the fullness of experience, and the persuasiveness of the presentation are the leading motives in the perception of the artistic system of Stanislavsky by Russian directors of the Soviet era such as Oleg Efremov and Georgi Tovstonogov. These directors saw the merits of Stanislavsky’s artistic method, but also recognized the need for innovations as they contemplated an artistic trajectory of the Moscow Art Theatre. However, an essential revision of the psychological symbolism of Stanislavsky, for whom the possibility of the creation was based on a simple reflection of the most intense effects of impulsive expressions of our internal nature, took place in the late Soviet and post-Soviet time in the phenomenological theatre of Piotr Fomenko, Anatoli Vasiliev and Аndrei Zholdak, in which every symbolizing consciousness became a natural attitude – an approach different from the one that focused on capturing the essence of reality of human life.","PeriodicalId":40821,"journal":{"name":"Stanislavski Studies","volume":"235 1","pages":"81 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stanislavski Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20567790.2020.1860161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Konstantin Stanislavsky created his artistic method of psychological symbolism, trying to overcome the legacy of the socio-typological theatre of the nineteenth century, where the actors’ internal resources were aimed at reproducing recognizable social reflexes of consciousness. Alexander Ostrovsky`s theatre consolidated this tradition in Russian theatrical culture, offering a powerful ensemble of dramatic characters and typical situations of Russian life. The theatre production becomes a continuous discovery of the author’s intention by the director, not a simple presentation of social types. The truth of life, the manifestation of essence as an identity in all changes of action, the fullness of experience, and the persuasiveness of the presentation are the leading motives in the perception of the artistic system of Stanislavsky by Russian directors of the Soviet era such as Oleg Efremov and Georgi Tovstonogov. These directors saw the merits of Stanislavsky’s artistic method, but also recognized the need for innovations as they contemplated an artistic trajectory of the Moscow Art Theatre. However, an essential revision of the psychological symbolism of Stanislavsky, for whom the possibility of the creation was based on a simple reflection of the most intense effects of impulsive expressions of our internal nature, took place in the late Soviet and post-Soviet time in the phenomenological theatre of Piotr Fomenko, Anatoli Vasiliev and Аndrei Zholdak, in which every symbolizing consciousness became a natural attitude – an approach different from the one that focused on capturing the essence of reality of human life.
斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基的方法及其在俄罗斯文化中的一些概念呼应
康斯坦丁·斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基创造了他的心理象征主义艺术方法,试图克服19世纪社会类型戏剧的遗产,演员的内部资源旨在再现可识别的社会意识反射。亚历山大·奥斯特洛夫斯基的戏剧在俄罗斯戏剧文化中巩固了这一传统,提供了一个强大的戏剧人物和典型的俄罗斯生活场景。戏剧制作成为导演对作者意图的不断发现,而不是简单的社会类型呈现。生活的真理性、作为一种身份的本质在一切行动变化中的表现、经验的充实感和表现的说服力是苏联时代俄罗斯导演奥列格·叶夫雷莫夫和格奥尔基·托夫斯托诺夫等人感知斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基艺术体系的主要动机。这些导演看到了斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基艺术方法的优点,但在考虑莫斯科艺术剧院的艺术轨迹时,他们也认识到创新的必要性。然而,对斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基的心理象征主义进行了重要的修订,对他来说,创作的可能性是基于对我们内在本性的冲动表达的最强烈影响的简单反映,发生在苏联后期和后苏联时期,在彼得·福门科、阿纳托利·瓦西里耶夫和Аndrei Zholdak的现象学戏剧中,其中,每一种象征意识都成为一种自然的态度——一种不同于专注于捕捉人类生活现实本质的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信