Deposition Rates of Asthma Triggers on Conventional and Enclosed Window Treatments

Thorner Ps, Metwali N, W. Ng
{"title":"Deposition Rates of Asthma Triggers on Conventional and Enclosed Window Treatments","authors":"Thorner Ps, Metwali N, W. Ng","doi":"10.26420/austinjenvirontoxicol.2021.1039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental interventions are an important element of managing allergies and asthma. Health professionals often recommend that draperies be replaced with window blinds however no data exist on accumulation of inhalant allergens or inflammatory bioaerosols on window treatments. Installing blinds that accumulate less dust may reduce breathing zone exposures when blinds are adjusted if hazardous amounts of bioaerosols are deposited. We sought to determine the rate of accumulation of dust, allergens, bacterial endotoxin and fungal glucan on window blinds of two distinct types mounted on the two types of windows most commonly installed in U.S. homes. The blinds tested were conventional horizontal slat blinds hanging on the inside of the window (roomside blinds) and similar blinds placed between the exterior window glass and an extra pane of glass on the interior side (between-glass blinds). The study was conducted in six households as a paired, repeated measures study. Households were identified for participation, having met the study criteria of children and cats living inside a carpeted home. Standard window blinds accumulated cat allergen, endotoxin and fungal glucan at rates of 5940ng/m², 1910EU/m², and 11,360ng/m² per month. Between-glass blinds reduced the loading of asthma triggers by 25- to 185-fold. Comparison with clinical thresholds associated with asthma morbidity indicates that room-side blinds accumulate potentially hazardous quantities of asthma triggers.","PeriodicalId":91210,"journal":{"name":"Austin journal of environmental toxicology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin journal of environmental toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjenvirontoxicol.2021.1039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental interventions are an important element of managing allergies and asthma. Health professionals often recommend that draperies be replaced with window blinds however no data exist on accumulation of inhalant allergens or inflammatory bioaerosols on window treatments. Installing blinds that accumulate less dust may reduce breathing zone exposures when blinds are adjusted if hazardous amounts of bioaerosols are deposited. We sought to determine the rate of accumulation of dust, allergens, bacterial endotoxin and fungal glucan on window blinds of two distinct types mounted on the two types of windows most commonly installed in U.S. homes. The blinds tested were conventional horizontal slat blinds hanging on the inside of the window (roomside blinds) and similar blinds placed between the exterior window glass and an extra pane of glass on the interior side (between-glass blinds). The study was conducted in six households as a paired, repeated measures study. Households were identified for participation, having met the study criteria of children and cats living inside a carpeted home. Standard window blinds accumulated cat allergen, endotoxin and fungal glucan at rates of 5940ng/m², 1910EU/m², and 11,360ng/m² per month. Between-glass blinds reduced the loading of asthma triggers by 25- to 185-fold. Comparison with clinical thresholds associated with asthma morbidity indicates that room-side blinds accumulate potentially hazardous quantities of asthma triggers.
常规和封闭窗治疗哮喘触发物的沉积率
环境干预是管理过敏和哮喘的一个重要因素。卫生专业人员经常建议用百叶窗代替窗帘,但没有关于吸入性过敏原或炎症性生物气溶胶在窗户治疗中的积累的数据。安装积聚较少灰尘的百叶窗可以减少呼吸区暴露,当百叶窗被调整时,有害数量的生物气溶胶沉积。我们试图确定灰尘、过敏原、细菌内毒素和真菌葡聚糖在两种不同类型的百叶窗上的积累率,这些百叶窗安装在美国家庭中最常见的两种窗户上。测试的百叶窗是悬挂在窗户内侧的传统水平板条百叶窗(房间侧百叶窗)和放置在外部窗户玻璃和内部额外玻璃之间的类似百叶窗(玻璃间百叶窗)。这项研究是在六个家庭中进行的,是一项成对的、重复测量的研究。确定了符合儿童和猫生活在铺有地毯的家中的研究标准的家庭参与研究。标准百叶窗每月累积猫过敏原、内毒素和真菌葡聚糖的速率分别为5940ng/m²、1910EU/m²和11,360ng/m²。玻璃间的百叶窗使哮喘诱因的负荷减少了25- 185倍。与哮喘发病相关的临床阈值的比较表明,房间侧盲累积了潜在危险数量的哮喘触发器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信