Effect of sucrose replacer on physicochemical properties and sensory analysis of rose tea gummy jelly

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Tunyaluk Bouphun, Tanongsak Sassa-deepaeng, Ritthikrai Krueaboon
{"title":"Effect of sucrose replacer on physicochemical properties and sensory analysis of rose tea gummy jelly","authors":"Tunyaluk Bouphun, Tanongsak Sassa-deepaeng, Ritthikrai Krueaboon","doi":"10.47836/ifrj.30.2.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developing confectionery products by reducing sugar and using natural ingredients is an important response to health-conscious consumers. In the present work, we determined how different concentrations of sucralose (SC)—0, 25, 50, 75, and 100%—as a replacement for sucrose while maintaining the same level of sweetness of rose tea gummy jelly (RTGJ) could affect the physical properties, reducing sugar content, total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), antioxidant activity by DPPH method, sensory properties, and consumer attitude toward RTGJ. Results showed that the red colour (a* value) of 100% SC was the highest (p < 0.05). The hardness, gumminess, and chewiness values of 50% SC were the highest at a significant level (p < 0.05). The springiness and water activity of all samples were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Total reducing sugar content in the control sample was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than in other samples. The TPC and TFC of RTGJ were not significantly different (p > 0.05) among all samples, while antioxidant activity slightly decreased with increasing amount of SC in RTGJ. Remarkably, sensory analysis revealed no differences between the control sample and 100% SC, which had the highest liking scores in terms of sweetness, sourness, springiness, rose tea flavour, and overall liking. Consumers expressed that RTGJ with 100% SC could help them to relax and decrease tooth decay. The present work introduced a new functional jelly confectionery product using 100% SC and adding rose tea which showed potential for promoting phytochemical properties and enhancing emotional and health advantages.","PeriodicalId":13754,"journal":{"name":"international food research journal","volume":"236 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"international food research journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47836/ifrj.30.2.13","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Developing confectionery products by reducing sugar and using natural ingredients is an important response to health-conscious consumers. In the present work, we determined how different concentrations of sucralose (SC)—0, 25, 50, 75, and 100%—as a replacement for sucrose while maintaining the same level of sweetness of rose tea gummy jelly (RTGJ) could affect the physical properties, reducing sugar content, total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), antioxidant activity by DPPH method, sensory properties, and consumer attitude toward RTGJ. Results showed that the red colour (a* value) of 100% SC was the highest (p < 0.05). The hardness, gumminess, and chewiness values of 50% SC were the highest at a significant level (p < 0.05). The springiness and water activity of all samples were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Total reducing sugar content in the control sample was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than in other samples. The TPC and TFC of RTGJ were not significantly different (p > 0.05) among all samples, while antioxidant activity slightly decreased with increasing amount of SC in RTGJ. Remarkably, sensory analysis revealed no differences between the control sample and 100% SC, which had the highest liking scores in terms of sweetness, sourness, springiness, rose tea flavour, and overall liking. Consumers expressed that RTGJ with 100% SC could help them to relax and decrease tooth decay. The present work introduced a new functional jelly confectionery product using 100% SC and adding rose tea which showed potential for promoting phytochemical properties and enhancing emotional and health advantages.
蔗糖替代品对玫瑰花茶软糖理化性质及感官分析的影响
通过减少糖和使用天然成分来开发糖果产品是对注重健康的消费者的重要回应。在本研究中,我们研究了不同浓度的三氯蔗糖(SC) -0、25、50、75和100% -在保持相同甜度的情况下替代蔗糖对玫瑰花茶软糖(RTGJ)的物理特性、还原糖含量、总酚含量(TPC)、总黄酮含量(TFC)、DPPH法抗氧化活性、感官特性和消费者对RTGJ的态度的影响。结果表明,100% SC的红度(a*值)最高(p < 0.05)。50% SC的硬度、胶度和嚼劲值最高,达到显著水平(p < 0.05)。各样品的弹性和水活度差异不显著(p > 0.05)。对照样品总还原糖含量显著高于其他样品(p < 0.05)。RTGJ的TPC和TFC在各样品间差异不显著(p > 0.05),而抗氧化活性随着SC含量的增加而略有下降。值得注意的是,感官分析显示,对照样品和100% SC之间没有差异,100% SC在甜度、酸味、弹性、玫瑰花茶味和总体喜欢度方面得分最高。消费者表示,100% SC的RTGJ可以帮助他们放松和减少蛀牙。本工作介绍了一种新的功能性果冻糖果产品,该产品采用100% SC并添加玫瑰花茶,具有促进植物化学特性和增强情感和健康益处的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
international food research journal
international food research journal Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: The International Food Research Journal (IFRJ) publishes papers in English, six (6) issues a year with the coverage of: Food Science and Technology Nutrition and Dietetics Agriculture, multidisciplinary Chemistry, multidisciplinary The scope of the Journal includes: Food Science, Food Technology and Food Biotechnology Product Development and Sensory Evaluation Food Habits, Nutrition, and Health Food Safety and Quality Food Chemistry, Food Microbiology, Food Analysis and Testing Food Engineering Food Packaging Food Waste Management Food Entrepreneur Food Regulatory Post-Harvest Food Management Food Supply Chain Management Halal Food and Management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信