Methodology Article: Can Ruminal Reducing Power Assessed in Batch Cultures be Comparable to in Vivo Measurements?

C. Julien, J. Marden, A. Troegeler-Meynadier, Corine Bayourthe
{"title":"Methodology Article: Can Ruminal Reducing Power Assessed in Batch Cultures be Comparable to in Vivo Measurements?","authors":"C. Julien, J. Marden, A. Troegeler-Meynadier, Corine Bayourthe","doi":"10.4236/JASMI.2014.43011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In ruminant field \nof digestive research, the appeal to methods of less invasive studies and reproducing \nthe in vivo conditions is essential. The \nobjective of the present study was to determine whether the conditions created \nwith the proposed in vitro batch \nculture was an accurate reproduction of the physico-chemical and fermentative \nruminal conditions observed in vivo. \nTwo experiments were conducted to compare ruminal reducing power measured in \nvitro, i.e. in batch \ncultures or, in vivo i.e. in live animals: dairy cows at \nmaintenance (Experiment 1) and lactating dairy cows (Experiment 2). In \nExperiment 1, at the beginning of incubation period, in vitro redox potential (Eh), pH \nand Clark’s exponent (rH) values were significantly higher than in vivo (+42 \nmV, +0.25 and +1.9, respectively) whereas volatile fatty acids (VFA) contents \nwere 2.6 fold lower on average. At the end of incubation, Eh, \nrH values and VFA contents were similar between both methods whereas pH still \nremained different. In Experiment 2, at the beginning and at the end of incubation \nperiod, in vitro Eh, pH and rH values differed \nsignificantly than in vivo. As a result, the in vitro method did \nnot provide a tool to evaluate accurately the level of the reducing status of \nruminal milieu compared with in vivo measurement. Nonetheless, it \nprovided strong reducing conditions after 8 h of incubation with levels of rH \nrelatively closed to those observed in \nvivo. In vitro batch culture \ncould be a good alternative to in vivo trials for a screening approach \nfrom an ethic and economic point of view in ruminant field of research.","PeriodicalId":14932,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Sciences, Methods and Instrumentation","volume":"3 1","pages":"80-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Sciences, Methods and Instrumentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/JASMI.2014.43011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In ruminant field of digestive research, the appeal to methods of less invasive studies and reproducing the in vivo conditions is essential. The objective of the present study was to determine whether the conditions created with the proposed in vitro batch culture was an accurate reproduction of the physico-chemical and fermentative ruminal conditions observed in vivo. Two experiments were conducted to compare ruminal reducing power measured in vitro, i.e. in batch cultures or, in vivo i.e. in live animals: dairy cows at maintenance (Experiment 1) and lactating dairy cows (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, at the beginning of incubation period, in vitro redox potential (Eh), pH and Clark’s exponent (rH) values were significantly higher than in vivo (+42 mV, +0.25 and +1.9, respectively) whereas volatile fatty acids (VFA) contents were 2.6 fold lower on average. At the end of incubation, Eh, rH values and VFA contents were similar between both methods whereas pH still remained different. In Experiment 2, at the beginning and at the end of incubation period, in vitro Eh, pH and rH values differed significantly than in vivo. As a result, the in vitro method did not provide a tool to evaluate accurately the level of the reducing status of ruminal milieu compared with in vivo measurement. Nonetheless, it provided strong reducing conditions after 8 h of incubation with levels of rH relatively closed to those observed in vivo. In vitro batch culture could be a good alternative to in vivo trials for a screening approach from an ethic and economic point of view in ruminant field of research.
方法学文章:在批培养中评估的瘤胃缩小能力是否可以与体内测量相媲美?
在反刍动物消化系统的研究中,采用微创研究和再现体内条件的方法是必不可少的。本研究的目的是确定体外分批培养所创造的条件是否准确再现了体内观察到的物理化学和发酵瘤胃条件。为比较体外(即批量培养)和体内(即活体动物:维持期奶牛(试验1)和泌乳期奶牛(试验2)的瘤胃还原能力,进行了两项试验。在试验1中,孵育初期,体外氧化还原电位(Eh)、pH和克拉克指数(rH)值显著高于体内(分别为+42 mV、+0.25 mV和+1.9 mV),挥发性脂肪酸(VFA)含量平均降低2.6倍。孵育结束时,两种方法的Eh、rH值和VFA含量相近,但pH值仍有差异。在实验2中,孵育开始和结束时,体外Eh、pH和rH值与体内差异显著。因此,与体内测量相比,体外方法不能提供准确评估瘤胃环境还原状态水平的工具。尽管如此,在孵育8小时后,它提供了强大的还原条件,rH水平相对接近体内观察到的水平。从伦理和经济的角度来看,体外分批培养可以作为反刍动物研究领域筛选方法的一个很好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信