Assessing dual language learners of Spanish and English: Development of the QUILS: ES

Q3 Nursing
Jill de Villiers , Aquiles Iglesias , Roberta Golinkoff , Kathy Hirsh-Pasek , Mary Sweig Wilson , Ratna Nandakumar
{"title":"Assessing dual language learners of Spanish and English: Development of the QUILS: ES","authors":"Jill de Villiers ,&nbsp;Aquiles Iglesias ,&nbsp;Roberta Golinkoff ,&nbsp;Kathy Hirsh-Pasek ,&nbsp;Mary Sweig Wilson ,&nbsp;Ratna Nandakumar","doi":"10.1016/j.rlfa.2020.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>Developing a language screener for Dual Language Learners presents numerous challenges. We discuss possible solutions for theoretical and methodological problems often encountered in the development of such a test and illustrate possible solutions using a newly developed language screener for Dual Language Learners.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>The process for developing, validating and norming the screener is also offered as a potential model for the development of other assessments for Dual Language Learners throughout the world. The twelve types of subtests are in three categories: Vocabulary, Syntax, and Process.</p></div><div><h3>Results and conclusions</h3><p>Results from the Tryout and Norming phase on 362 Dual Language Learners aged 3–5;11 years are presented, together with the results of item selection via IRT, validity, and reliability testing. The advantage of using Best Scores is highlighted as a useful measure to identify children who are at risk for language difficulties that will impact their academic success. Importantly, knowledge is found to be distributed across the languages.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56174,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Logopedia, Foniatria y Audiologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rlfa.2020.11.001","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Logopedia, Foniatria y Audiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0214460320301121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Introduction and objectives

Developing a language screener for Dual Language Learners presents numerous challenges. We discuss possible solutions for theoretical and methodological problems often encountered in the development of such a test and illustrate possible solutions using a newly developed language screener for Dual Language Learners.

Materials and methods

The process for developing, validating and norming the screener is also offered as a potential model for the development of other assessments for Dual Language Learners throughout the world. The twelve types of subtests are in three categories: Vocabulary, Syntax, and Process.

Results and conclusions

Results from the Tryout and Norming phase on 362 Dual Language Learners aged 3–5;11 years are presented, together with the results of item selection via IRT, validity, and reliability testing. The advantage of using Best Scores is highlighted as a useful measure to identify children who are at risk for language difficulties that will impact their academic success. Importantly, knowledge is found to be distributed across the languages.

评估西班牙语和英语双语学习者:QUILS: ES的发展
为双语学习者开发语言筛选器面临许多挑战。我们讨论了在开发这种测试过程中经常遇到的理论和方法问题的可能解决方案,并举例说明了使用新开发的双语学习者语言筛选器的可能解决方案。材料和方法开发、验证和规范筛选的过程也提供了一个潜在的模型,为世界各地的双语学习者开发其他评估。12种类型的子测试分为三类:词汇、语法和过程。报告了362名年龄在3-5岁和11岁的双语学习者的试习和规范阶段的结果,以及通过IRT进行的项目选择、效度和信度测试的结果。使用最高分的优势被强调为一种有用的措施,可以识别那些有语言困难风险的孩子,这将影响他们的学业成功。重要的是,人们发现知识是跨语言分布的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信