Agricultural management effects on mean and extreme temperature trends

Aine M. Gormley-Gallagher, S. Sterl, A. Hirsch, S. Seneviratne, E. Davin, W. Thiery
{"title":"Agricultural management effects on mean and extreme temperature\ntrends","authors":"Aine M. Gormley-Gallagher, S. Sterl, A. Hirsch, S. Seneviratne, E. Davin, W. Thiery","doi":"10.5194/esd-2020-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Regression-based trend analysis is applied to observations and present-day ensemble simulations with the Community Earth System Model to assess if climate models overestimate warming trends because theoretical constant levels of irrigation and conservation agriculture (CA) are excluded. At the regional scale, an irrigation- and CA-induced acceleration of the annual mean near-surface air temperature (T2m) warming trends and the annual maximum daytime temperature (TXx) warming trends were evident. Estimation of the impact of irrigation and CA on the spatial average of the warming trends indicated that irrigation and CA have a pulse cooling effect on T2m and TXx, after which the warming trends increase at a greater rate than the control simulations. This differed at the local (subgrid) scale under irrigation where surface temperature cooling and the dampening of warming trends were both evident. As the local surface warming trends, in contrast to regional trends, do not account for atmospheric (water vapour) feedbacks, their dampening confirms the importance of atmospheric feedbacks (water vapour forcing) in explaining the enhanced regional trends. At the land surface, the positive radiative forcing signal is too weak to offset the local cooling from the irrigation-induced increase in the evaporative fraction. Our results underline that agricultural management has complex and nonnegligible impacts on the local climate and highlights the need to account for land management in climate projections.\n","PeriodicalId":11466,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Dynamics Discussions","volume":"284 1","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Dynamics Discussions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2020-35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract. Regression-based trend analysis is applied to observations and present-day ensemble simulations with the Community Earth System Model to assess if climate models overestimate warming trends because theoretical constant levels of irrigation and conservation agriculture (CA) are excluded. At the regional scale, an irrigation- and CA-induced acceleration of the annual mean near-surface air temperature (T2m) warming trends and the annual maximum daytime temperature (TXx) warming trends were evident. Estimation of the impact of irrigation and CA on the spatial average of the warming trends indicated that irrigation and CA have a pulse cooling effect on T2m and TXx, after which the warming trends increase at a greater rate than the control simulations. This differed at the local (subgrid) scale under irrigation where surface temperature cooling and the dampening of warming trends were both evident. As the local surface warming trends, in contrast to regional trends, do not account for atmospheric (water vapour) feedbacks, their dampening confirms the importance of atmospheric feedbacks (water vapour forcing) in explaining the enhanced regional trends. At the land surface, the positive radiative forcing signal is too weak to offset the local cooling from the irrigation-induced increase in the evaporative fraction. Our results underline that agricultural management has complex and nonnegligible impacts on the local climate and highlights the need to account for land management in climate projections.
农业管理对平均和极端温度趋势的影响
摘要基于回归的趋势分析应用于观测和当前群落地球系统模式的集合模拟,以评估气候模式是否高估了变暖趋势,因为排除了灌溉和保护性农业(CA)的理论恒定水平。在区域尺度上,灌溉和ca诱导的年平均近地表气温(T2m)和年最高日间气温(TXx)升温趋势明显加速。灌溉和CA对增温趋势空间平均值的影响表明,灌溉和CA对T2m和TXx具有脉冲降温效应,之后增温趋势的增长速度大于对照模拟。这在灌溉的局部(亚网格)尺度上有所不同,地表温度下降和变暖趋势的抑制都很明显。由于与区域趋势相反,局部地表变暖趋势不考虑大气(水蒸气)反馈,因此它们的抑制证实了大气反馈(水蒸气强迫)在解释增强的区域趋势方面的重要性。在陆地表面,正辐射强迫信号太弱,无法抵消灌溉引起的蒸发分数增加所造成的局部冷却。我们的研究结果强调了农业管理对当地气候具有复杂和不可忽视的影响,并强调了在气候预测中考虑土地管理的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信