Utility of lipopolysaccharides from Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis in the serodiagnosis of pertussis and parapertussis

K. Amano , T. Aoyama
{"title":"Utility of lipopolysaccharides from Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis in the serodiagnosis of pertussis and parapertussis","authors":"K. Amano ,&nbsp;T. Aoyama","doi":"10.1016/0888-0786(95)93023-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Bordetella pertussis</em> (Bp) and <em>Bordetella parapertussis</em> (Bpp), which are responsible for outbreaks of whooping cough in humans, are closely related, and it is difficult to discriminate between these species immunologically. We developed an immunodiagnostic method using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or immunoblotting, on the basis of the serological differences between lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Bp and Bpp. In ELISA, the sera from nine out of 11 patients with pertussis (about 80%) possessed high reactivities against whole cells (WC) of Bp in comparison with Bpp-WC, whereas the sera from five patients with the same disease (about 45%) reacted with Bp-LPS more than with Bpp-LPS. High reactivity against Bpp-WC and Bpp-LPS in the sera from 13 out of 16 patients with parapertussis (about 80%) was shown as compared with that against Bp-WC and Bp-LPS, respectively. Immunoblotting showed that all of the sera from pertussis patients reacted more strongly with Bp-LPS than with Bpp-LPS, except those which were unreactive. Almost all of the sera from parapertussis patients reacted with Bpp-LPS more than with Bp-LPS. These results indicated that immunoblotting, rather than ELISA, using LPS from Bp and Bpp is useful for serodiagnosis to distinguish between pertussis and parapertussis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101161,"journal":{"name":"Serodiagnosis and Immunotherapy in Infectious Disease","volume":"7 1","pages":"Pages 7-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0888-0786(95)93023-5","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Serodiagnosis and Immunotherapy in Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0888078695930235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bordetella pertussis (Bp) and Bordetella parapertussis (Bpp), which are responsible for outbreaks of whooping cough in humans, are closely related, and it is difficult to discriminate between these species immunologically. We developed an immunodiagnostic method using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or immunoblotting, on the basis of the serological differences between lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Bp and Bpp. In ELISA, the sera from nine out of 11 patients with pertussis (about 80%) possessed high reactivities against whole cells (WC) of Bp in comparison with Bpp-WC, whereas the sera from five patients with the same disease (about 45%) reacted with Bp-LPS more than with Bpp-LPS. High reactivity against Bpp-WC and Bpp-LPS in the sera from 13 out of 16 patients with parapertussis (about 80%) was shown as compared with that against Bp-WC and Bp-LPS, respectively. Immunoblotting showed that all of the sera from pertussis patients reacted more strongly with Bp-LPS than with Bpp-LPS, except those which were unreactive. Almost all of the sera from parapertussis patients reacted with Bpp-LPS more than with Bp-LPS. These results indicated that immunoblotting, rather than ELISA, using LPS from Bp and Bpp is useful for serodiagnosis to distinguish between pertussis and parapertussis.

百日咳和副百日咳杆菌脂多糖在百日咳和副百日咳血清诊断中的应用
引起人类百日咳暴发的百日咳博德泰拉(Bp)和副百日咳博德泰拉(Bpp)亲缘关系密切,很难从免疫学上区分这两种细菌。基于Bp和Bpp中脂多糖(LPS)的血清学差异,我们开发了一种使用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)或免疫印迹法的免疫诊断方法。ELISA结果显示,与Bpp-WC相比,11例百日咳患者中有9例(约80%)的血清对Bp全细胞(WC)具有较高的反应活性,而5例相同疾病的患者(约45%)的血清对Bp- lps的反应高于Bpp-LPS。与Bp-WC和Bp-LPS相比,16例百日咳患者中有13例(约80%)血清对Bp-WC和Bp-LPS具有较高的反应性。免疫印迹法显示,除无反应者外,所有百日咳患者血清对Bp-LPS的反应均强于Bpp-LPS。几乎所有的百日咳患者血清对Bp-LPS的反应大于Bp-LPS。这些结果表明,免疫印迹法,而不是ELISA法,利用Bp和Bpp的LPS可用于血清诊断,以区分百日咳和百日咳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信