Reproducibility, validity, and reliability of the incremental step test for subjects with moderate to severe asthma

IF 10.4 2区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
R.C.C. Barbosa , R.A. Silva , A.C. Lunardi , S.T.C. Silva , S.D. Corso , A.J. Fonseca , R. Stelmach , C.R.F. Carvalho
{"title":"Reproducibility, validity, and reliability of the incremental step test for subjects with moderate to severe asthma","authors":"R.C.C. Barbosa ,&nbsp;R.A. Silva ,&nbsp;A.C. Lunardi ,&nbsp;S.T.C. Silva ,&nbsp;S.D. Corso ,&nbsp;A.J. Fonseca ,&nbsp;R. Stelmach ,&nbsp;C.R.F. Carvalho","doi":"10.1016/j.pulmoe.2022.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We investigated the measurement properties of the incremental step test in subjects with moderate to severe asthma.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Subjects with moderate to severe persistent asthma were recruited from a tertiary university hospital specializing in treating severe asthma. All subjects performed one cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and two incremental step tests (IST) in random sequences. Pulmonary gas exchange was measured during all exercise tests. The measurement properties investigated were reliability by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), measurement error by the standard error of measurement and minimum detectable difference, construct validity by Pearson's correlation, and interpretability by the ceiling and floor effects.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fifty subjects (38 females, mean [SD], age 43.7 [11.6] yr, % FEV<sub>1</sub> 70 [14.3], BMI 28.5 [5.3] kg/m<sup>2</sup>) completed the study. The peak oxygen uptake (peak VO<sub>2</sub>) for the CPET was 27.6 [±6.8] ml/kg/min, for the first IST was 22.3 [±5.3] ml/kg/min and for the second IST was 23.3 [±5.3] ml/kg/min. The IST presented excellent reliability (ICC=0.93, CI95% 0.88-0.96), very good measurement error (2.5%), and construct validity for peak VO<sub>2</sub> measurement compared to the CPET (<em>r</em> = 0.85; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) to assess exercise capacity in subjects with moderate to severe asthma, with appropriate ceiling (10%) and floor (0%) effects.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The IST presented excellent reliability and very good measurement error and validity to assess exercise capacity in subjects with moderate to severe asthma, without ceiling or floor effects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54237,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531043722000290/pdfft?md5=3bcef3d33db67e1b3a205ce1687f7cfe&pid=1-s2.0-S2531043722000290-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2531043722000290","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We investigated the measurement properties of the incremental step test in subjects with moderate to severe asthma.

Methods

Subjects with moderate to severe persistent asthma were recruited from a tertiary university hospital specializing in treating severe asthma. All subjects performed one cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and two incremental step tests (IST) in random sequences. Pulmonary gas exchange was measured during all exercise tests. The measurement properties investigated were reliability by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), measurement error by the standard error of measurement and minimum detectable difference, construct validity by Pearson's correlation, and interpretability by the ceiling and floor effects.

Results

Fifty subjects (38 females, mean [SD], age 43.7 [11.6] yr, % FEV1 70 [14.3], BMI 28.5 [5.3] kg/m2) completed the study. The peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2) for the CPET was 27.6 [±6.8] ml/kg/min, for the first IST was 22.3 [±5.3] ml/kg/min and for the second IST was 23.3 [±5.3] ml/kg/min. The IST presented excellent reliability (ICC=0.93, CI95% 0.88-0.96), very good measurement error (2.5%), and construct validity for peak VO2 measurement compared to the CPET (r = 0.85; p < 0.001) to assess exercise capacity in subjects with moderate to severe asthma, with appropriate ceiling (10%) and floor (0%) effects.

Conclusion

The IST presented excellent reliability and very good measurement error and validity to assess exercise capacity in subjects with moderate to severe asthma, without ceiling or floor effects.

针对中重度哮喘患者的增量台阶试验的再现性、有效性和可靠性。
目的我们研究了中度至重度哮喘患者增量台阶试验的测量特性:方法:我们从一家专门治疗重症哮喘的三级甲等大学医院招募了患有中重度持续性哮喘的受试者。所有受试者以随机顺序进行了一次心肺运动测试(CPET)和两次增量阶梯测试(IST)。在所有运动测试中都测量了肺气体交换。研究的测量特性包括:用类内相关系数(ICC)表示的可靠性、用测量标准误差和最小可检测差异表示的测量误差、用皮尔逊相关性表示的结构效度以及用上限和下限效应表示的可解释性:50 名受试者(38 名女性,平均[标码],年龄 43.7 [11.6] 岁,FEV1 70 [14.3] %,体重指数 28.5 [5.3] kg/m2)完成了研究。CPET 的峰值摄氧量(峰值 VO2)为 27.6 [±6.8] 毫升/千克/分钟,第一次 IST 为 22.3 [±5.3] 毫升/千克/分钟,第二次 IST 为 23.3 [±5.3] 毫升/千克/分钟。与 CPET 相比,IST 具有极佳的可靠性(ICC=0.93,CI95% 0.88-0.96)、极好的测量误差(2.5%)和峰值 VO2 测量的构造效度(r = 0.85;p 结论:IST 具有极佳的可靠性和极好的构造效度:IST 在评估中重度哮喘患者的运动能力方面具有极佳的可靠性、极好的测量误差和有效性,且无上限或下限效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pulmonology
Pulmonology Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
159
审稿时长
19 days
期刊介绍: Pulmonology (previously Revista Portuguesa de Pneumologia) is the official journal of the Portuguese Society of Pulmonology (Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia/SPP). The journal publishes 6 issues per year and focuses on respiratory system diseases in adults and clinical research. It accepts various types of articles including peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, editorials, and opinion articles. The journal is published in English and is freely accessible through its website, as well as Medline and other databases. It is indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded, Journal of Citation Reports, Index Medicus/MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE/Excerpta Medica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信