{"title":"Effect of Arch-Wire Coating on Friction of Ceramic Bracket laboratory study","authors":"R. Ahmed, Walaa El gemaey, A. Ramadan","doi":"10.21608/dsu.2022.86825.1073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The increasing demand for esthetics has promoted the development of wires coated with polymeric materials such as polymer matrix reinforced with glassfibers. Thus, the surface and thickness of metallic-coated wires can be modified to affect corrosive properties, mechanical durability and especially friction forces. Aim: To evaluate the frictional properties between Teflon coated and non-coated stainless-steel orthodontic arch-wires (0.017 x 0.025-inches and 0.019 x 0.025-inches) with ceramic brackets of 0.018 and 0.022-inch slots. Material and methods: Sixteen orthodontic maxillary premolar mono-crystalline ceramic brackets, eight brackets with 0.018-inch and eight brackets with 0.022-inch slot size. Roth prescription were used. Twenty stainless-steel 0.017 x 0.025-inch arch-wires were used (ten Teflon coated and ten noncoated). Twenty stainless-steel 0.019 x 0.025-inch arch-wires were used (ten Teflon coated and ten non-coated). All arch-wires were cut to symmetrical equal halves using a wire cutter at the midline and each half was used separately. The total number of wire segments used in the study was eighty orthodontic maxillary stainless-steel archwires. Each ceramic bracket tested five wire segments using new elastomeric modules each time. Each bracket was translated the same distance (5mm) relative to its wire segment by the LR5K Lloyd universal testing machine at the same speed of (5mm per minute). Results: The non-coated 17x25 –inch thickness stainless steel arch-wires showed higher friction than coated ones and the non-coated 0.019 x 0.025-inch. The coated 0.019x 0.025-inches stainless steel wire segments showed significant highest friction of 1687.25±97.5 than non-coated 0.019x 0.025-inches and coated/non-coated 0.017x 0.025-inches wire segments. Conclusion: The coated stainless-steel arch-wires had higher friction than the non-coated stainless-steel arch-wires on mono-crystalline ceramic brackets. INTRODUCTION The Teflon coating on orthodontic arch-wires and brackets increasing the antimicrobial and the mechanical properties, as friction, surface topography, or corrosion resistance. The type and nature of coating materials such as nitride ions, metals, oxides, teflon or resins exhibited stronger impact on determining the potential for corrosion of Nickel-titanium wires compared to values of surface roughness. The result of the study was that coating on the orthodontic wires and brackets used to reduce the friction problem during orthodontic treatment, minimizing the treatment time and the risk of bacteria adhesion(1). DOI: 10.21608/dsu.2022.86825.1073 Manuscript ID: DSU-2107-1073","PeriodicalId":11270,"journal":{"name":"Dental Science Updates","volume":"99 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Science Updates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/dsu.2022.86825.1073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The increasing demand for esthetics has promoted the development of wires coated with polymeric materials such as polymer matrix reinforced with glassfibers. Thus, the surface and thickness of metallic-coated wires can be modified to affect corrosive properties, mechanical durability and especially friction forces. Aim: To evaluate the frictional properties between Teflon coated and non-coated stainless-steel orthodontic arch-wires (0.017 x 0.025-inches and 0.019 x 0.025-inches) with ceramic brackets of 0.018 and 0.022-inch slots. Material and methods: Sixteen orthodontic maxillary premolar mono-crystalline ceramic brackets, eight brackets with 0.018-inch and eight brackets with 0.022-inch slot size. Roth prescription were used. Twenty stainless-steel 0.017 x 0.025-inch arch-wires were used (ten Teflon coated and ten noncoated). Twenty stainless-steel 0.019 x 0.025-inch arch-wires were used (ten Teflon coated and ten non-coated). All arch-wires were cut to symmetrical equal halves using a wire cutter at the midline and each half was used separately. The total number of wire segments used in the study was eighty orthodontic maxillary stainless-steel archwires. Each ceramic bracket tested five wire segments using new elastomeric modules each time. Each bracket was translated the same distance (5mm) relative to its wire segment by the LR5K Lloyd universal testing machine at the same speed of (5mm per minute). Results: The non-coated 17x25 –inch thickness stainless steel arch-wires showed higher friction than coated ones and the non-coated 0.019 x 0.025-inch. The coated 0.019x 0.025-inches stainless steel wire segments showed significant highest friction of 1687.25±97.5 than non-coated 0.019x 0.025-inches and coated/non-coated 0.017x 0.025-inches wire segments. Conclusion: The coated stainless-steel arch-wires had higher friction than the non-coated stainless-steel arch-wires on mono-crystalline ceramic brackets. INTRODUCTION The Teflon coating on orthodontic arch-wires and brackets increasing the antimicrobial and the mechanical properties, as friction, surface topography, or corrosion resistance. The type and nature of coating materials such as nitride ions, metals, oxides, teflon or resins exhibited stronger impact on determining the potential for corrosion of Nickel-titanium wires compared to values of surface roughness. The result of the study was that coating on the orthodontic wires and brackets used to reduce the friction problem during orthodontic treatment, minimizing the treatment time and the risk of bacteria adhesion(1). DOI: 10.21608/dsu.2022.86825.1073 Manuscript ID: DSU-2107-1073
导语:不断增长的美学需求促进了涂覆聚合物材料的电线的发展,如用玻璃纤维增强的聚合物基体。因此,可以修改金属涂层导线的表面和厚度,以影响腐蚀性能,机械耐久性,特别是摩擦力。目的:评价Teflon涂层和非涂层不锈钢正畸弓丝(0.017 x 0.025英寸和0.019 x 0.025英寸)与陶瓷托槽(0.018和0.022英寸)之间的摩擦性能。材料与方法:正畸上颌前磨牙单晶陶瓷托槽16个,槽口尺寸0.018英寸托槽8个,槽口尺寸0.022英寸托槽8个。采用罗斯处方。使用了20根0.017 x 0.025英寸的不锈钢弧线(10根涂有特氟龙涂层的和10根未涂有涂层的)。使用了20根0.019 x 0.025英寸的不锈钢弧线(10根涂覆特氟龙,10根未涂覆)。所有的弧线在中线处用钢丝刀切成对称相等的两半,每半分开使用。研究中使用的金属丝段总数为80根正畸上颌不锈钢弓丝。每个陶瓷支架每次使用新的弹性体模块测试五个导线段。LR5K劳埃德通用试验机以相同的速度(每分钟5mm)将每个支架相对于其线段平移相同的距离(5mm)。结果:未涂布的17x25英寸不锈钢拱丝的摩擦系数高于涂布的0.019 x 0.025英寸不锈钢拱丝。涂覆0.019x 0.025英寸不锈钢线段的摩擦值最高,为1687.25±97.5,高于未涂覆0.019x 0.025英寸和涂覆/未涂覆0.017x 0.025英寸线段。结论:包覆不锈钢弓丝对单晶陶瓷托槽的磨擦比未包覆不锈钢弓丝大。正畸弓线和托架上的特氟龙涂层增加了抗菌和机械性能,如摩擦、表面形貌或耐腐蚀性。涂层材料的类型和性质,如氮离子、金属、氧化物、聚四氟乙烯或树脂,与表面粗糙度值相比,对镍钛丝腐蚀潜力的影响更大。研究结果表明,在正畸金属丝和托槽上使用涂层可以减少正畸治疗过程中的摩擦问题,最大限度地减少治疗时间和细菌粘附的风险(1)。DOI: 10.21608/dsu.2022.86825.1073手稿ID: DSU-2107-1073