Drug Therapy Problems Identified by Pharmacists Through Comprehensive Medication Management Following Hospital Discharge

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Sarah M Westberg, Sarah K. Derr, E. Weinhandl, T. Adam, A. Brummel, J. Lahti, S. Reidt, Brian Sick, Kyle Skiermont, W. S. St. Peter
{"title":"Drug Therapy Problems Identified by Pharmacists Through Comprehensive Medication Management Following Hospital Discharge","authors":"Sarah M Westberg, Sarah K. Derr, E. Weinhandl, T. Adam, A. Brummel, J. Lahti, S. Reidt, Brian Sick, Kyle Skiermont, W. S. St. Peter","doi":"10.1177/8755122517698975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pharmacists influence health care outcomes through the identification and resolution of drug therapy problems (DTPs). Objective: The objectives of this study were to describe number, type, and severity of DTPs based on clinical significance and likelihood of harm in patients transitioning from hospital to home as assessed during a comprehensive medication management (CMM) visit with a pharmacist. Secondary objectives were to assess intrarater reliability in severity ratings and assess likelihood of harm for adverse drug reactions (ADR) by drug classes. Methods: Retrospective review of 408 patients having a face-to-face, telephonic, or virtual CMM visit within the Fairview Health System. Teams of 3 investigators reviewed each DTP from the electronic medical record for each of the 408 patients and assigned a severity score (0-10) for clinical significance and likelihood of harm. Main Results: The highest severity DTP classes were adherence and ADR. The lowest severity DTP class was unnecessary drug therapy. An average of 2.5 DTPs was found per patient at the index CMM visit following hospital discharge. The most common DTP classes were needs additional therapy and dose too low. There were statistically significant differences in DTP severity scoring between reviewer types, though differences were <5%. Drug classes with the highest severity ADR included diabetes, cardiovascular, and anticoagulant/antiplatelet agents. Conclusions: The DTP severity ratings indicated that reviewers found ADR and adherence DTPs were potentially the most severe. There were differences in DTP ratings between reviewer types, though clinical significance of these differences is unclear.","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":"1079 1","pages":"107 - 96"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/8755122517698975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Background: Pharmacists influence health care outcomes through the identification and resolution of drug therapy problems (DTPs). Objective: The objectives of this study were to describe number, type, and severity of DTPs based on clinical significance and likelihood of harm in patients transitioning from hospital to home as assessed during a comprehensive medication management (CMM) visit with a pharmacist. Secondary objectives were to assess intrarater reliability in severity ratings and assess likelihood of harm for adverse drug reactions (ADR) by drug classes. Methods: Retrospective review of 408 patients having a face-to-face, telephonic, or virtual CMM visit within the Fairview Health System. Teams of 3 investigators reviewed each DTP from the electronic medical record for each of the 408 patients and assigned a severity score (0-10) for clinical significance and likelihood of harm. Main Results: The highest severity DTP classes were adherence and ADR. The lowest severity DTP class was unnecessary drug therapy. An average of 2.5 DTPs was found per patient at the index CMM visit following hospital discharge. The most common DTP classes were needs additional therapy and dose too low. There were statistically significant differences in DTP severity scoring between reviewer types, though differences were <5%. Drug classes with the highest severity ADR included diabetes, cardiovascular, and anticoagulant/antiplatelet agents. Conclusions: The DTP severity ratings indicated that reviewers found ADR and adherence DTPs were potentially the most severe. There were differences in DTP ratings between reviewer types, though clinical significance of these differences is unclear.
药师通过出院后综合用药管理发现的药物治疗问题
背景:药师通过药物治疗问题(dtp)的识别和解决影响卫生保健结果。目的:本研究的目的是描述dtp的数量、类型和严重程度,基于临床意义和从医院转回家的患者危害的可能性,这是在药剂师的综合用药管理(CMM)访问中评估的。次要目的是评估严重程度分级的内部可靠性,并评估药物不良反应(ADR)危害的可能性。方法:回顾性分析在Fairview卫生系统进行面对面、电话或虚拟CMM就诊的408例患者。3名研究人员组成的小组对408名患者的电子医疗记录中的DTP进行了审查,并根据临床意义和伤害可能性对其进行了严重程度评分(0-10)。主要结果:最严重的DTP分级为依从性和不良反应。最低严重程度的DTP分级为不必要的药物治疗。在出院后的指数CMM访问中,平均每名患者发现2.5个dtp。最常见的百白破分类是需要额外治疗和剂量过低。不同审稿人类型的DTP严重程度评分差异有统计学意义,但差异均<5%。严重不良反应最高的药物类别包括糖尿病、心血管和抗凝血/抗血小板药物。结论:DTP严重程度分级表明,审稿人发现ADR和依从性DTP可能是最严重的。不同审稿人的DTP评分存在差异,但这些差异的临床意义尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信