Farm animal welfare: A survey of the opinion of farmers and consumers in Sardinia

G. Pulina , S. Carta , D. Pulino , S. Spanu , R. Deriu , A. Mazzette
{"title":"Farm animal welfare: A survey of the opinion of farmers and consumers in Sardinia","authors":"G. Pulina ,&nbsp;S. Carta ,&nbsp;D. Pulino ,&nbsp;S. Spanu ,&nbsp;R. Deriu ,&nbsp;A. Mazzette","doi":"10.1016/j.anopes.2022.100020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Animal welfare in the European Union is strictly regulated and has the highest standards in the field. It is also present in the CAP in both the first and second pillars. In Sardinia, animal welfare has taken on greater importance since it was introduced via the Rural Development Plan (<strong>RDP</strong>) in 2005. The context in which the animal welfare programme was initiated was that of a rural setting that had never before followed such projects and to which even the word welfare aimed at animals was alien. The welfare plan was geared hygiene in milking and housing, and the fight against foot problems and stress for primiparous ewes during the first week of milking. After 15 years of implementing animal welfare support interventions from public funds, this work aimed to investigate the perception of animal welfare among both beneficiary farmers and citizen-consumers. The data were collected in a linked survey on both farmers and consumers who are involved in the profound social and economic implications for the Island. On the one hand, 98% of breeders consider animal welfare to be important for the health and productivity of their animals, even though 59% also claim to have changed little or nothing in their farm management following the introduction of RDP measures, partially because the animal welfare measures were already being practised. On the other hand, public respondents’ willingness to pay more when it comes to purchase decisions can be considered as interesting evidence of a possible collective understanding which deserves further investigation. The results highlight the fact that animal welfare is undoubtedly a well-known and topical issue which has gained widespread attention and a broad agreement on its relevance and priority. Nonetheless, a shared vision on the meaning of welfare is lacking, even within regional policies that appear to be strongly segmented.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100083,"journal":{"name":"Animal - Open Space","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772694022000176/pdfft?md5=7a8744782b7227e4eb4784ebbba66bc9&pid=1-s2.0-S2772694022000176-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal - Open Space","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772694022000176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animal welfare in the European Union is strictly regulated and has the highest standards in the field. It is also present in the CAP in both the first and second pillars. In Sardinia, animal welfare has taken on greater importance since it was introduced via the Rural Development Plan (RDP) in 2005. The context in which the animal welfare programme was initiated was that of a rural setting that had never before followed such projects and to which even the word welfare aimed at animals was alien. The welfare plan was geared hygiene in milking and housing, and the fight against foot problems and stress for primiparous ewes during the first week of milking. After 15 years of implementing animal welfare support interventions from public funds, this work aimed to investigate the perception of animal welfare among both beneficiary farmers and citizen-consumers. The data were collected in a linked survey on both farmers and consumers who are involved in the profound social and economic implications for the Island. On the one hand, 98% of breeders consider animal welfare to be important for the health and productivity of their animals, even though 59% also claim to have changed little or nothing in their farm management following the introduction of RDP measures, partially because the animal welfare measures were already being practised. On the other hand, public respondents’ willingness to pay more when it comes to purchase decisions can be considered as interesting evidence of a possible collective understanding which deserves further investigation. The results highlight the fact that animal welfare is undoubtedly a well-known and topical issue which has gained widespread attention and a broad agreement on its relevance and priority. Nonetheless, a shared vision on the meaning of welfare is lacking, even within regional policies that appear to be strongly segmented.

农场动物福利:撒丁岛农民和消费者意见调查
欧盟的动物福利受到严格监管,在该领域拥有最高标准。它也出现在共同农业政策的第一和第二支柱中。在撒丁岛,自2005年通过农村发展计划(RDP)引入动物福利以来,动物福利变得更加重要。启动动物福利方案的背景是一个农村环境,以前从未有过这样的项目,甚至针对动物的福利这个词对它来说都是陌生的。福利计划着眼于挤奶和住房的卫生,以及在挤奶的第一周内与脚部问题和初产母羊的压力作斗争。在实施了15年的公共基金动物福利支持干预措施后,本研究旨在调查受益农民和公民消费者对动物福利的看法。这些数据是在对参与对该岛产生深远社会和经济影响的农民和消费者进行的一项相关调查中收集的。一方面,98%的育种者认为动物福利对其动物的健康和生产力很重要,尽管59%的育种者也声称,在引入RDP措施后,他们的农场管理几乎没有改变,部分原因是动物福利措施已经在实施。另一方面,公众受访者在购买决策时愿意支付更多的钱,这可以被视为一种可能的集体理解的有趣证据,值得进一步调查。研究结果强调了这样一个事实,即动物福利无疑是一个众所周知的热门话题,它已经引起了广泛的关注,并就其相关性和优先性达成了广泛的共识。然而,对福利意义的共同看法是缺乏的,即使在似乎严重分割的区域政策中也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信