Automation Radiomics in Predicting Radiation Pneumonitis (RP)

Abstract

Radiomics has shown great promise in predicting various diseases. Researchers have previously attempted to include radiomics in their automated detection, diagnosis, and segmentation algorithms, taking these steps based on the promising outcomes of radiomics-based studies. As a result of the increased attention given to this topic, numerous institutions have developed their own radiomics software. These packages, on the other hand, have been utilized interchangeably without regard for their fundamental differences. The primary purpose of this study was to explore benefits of predictive model performance for radiation pneumonitis (RP), which is the most frequent side effect of chest radiotherapy, and through this work, we developed a radiomics model based on deep learning that intends to increase RP prediction performance by combining more data points and digging deeper into these data. In order to evaluate the most popular machine learning models, radiographic characteristics were used, and we recorded the most important of them. The high dimensionality of radiomic datasets is a major issue. The method proposed for use in data problems is the synthetic minority oversampling technique, which we used in order to create a balanced dataset by leveraging suitable hardware and open-source software. The present study assessed the efficacy of various machine learning models, including logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and deep neural network (DNN), in predicting radiation pneumonitis by utilizing specific radiomics features. The findings of the study indicate that the four models displayed satisfactory efficacy in forecasting radiation pneumonitis. The DNN model demonstrated the highest area under the receiver operating curve (AUC-ROC) value, which was 0.87, suggesting its superior predictive capacity among the models considered. The AUC-ROC values for the random forest, SVM, and logistic regression models were 0.85, 0.83, and 0.81, respectively.