Effectiveness of a behavioural incentive scheme linked to goal achievement in overweight children: a cluster randomized controlled trial

J. Redfern, Gemma Enright, K. Hyun, S. Raadsma, M. Allman-Farinelli, C. Innes-Hughes, S. Khanal, S. Lukeis, C. Rissel, Hui-Yih Chai, A. Gyani
{"title":"Effectiveness of a behavioural incentive scheme linked to goal achievement in overweight children: a cluster randomized controlled trial","authors":"J. Redfern, Gemma Enright, K. Hyun, S. Raadsma, M. Allman-Farinelli, C. Innes-Hughes, S. Khanal, S. Lukeis, C. Rissel, Hui-Yih Chai, A. Gyani","doi":"10.33805/2638-812X.109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The prevalence of childhood overweight and obesity is becoming an increasing concern worldwide. This study aimed to determine effectiveness of a structured goal setting incentive scheme, delivered within a community program, on health outcomes in overweight children at 6 and 18 months.\nMethods: Single-blind, cluster randomized controlled trial with 10 weeks, 6 month and 18 month follow-up. Community weight-loss programs for children were randomized to (i) standard program plus incentive scheme (intervention) or (ii) standard program alone (control). Primary outcome was mean BMIz score at 18 months. Secondary outcomes included anthropometric and behavioural measures.\nResults: A total of 37 sites (33 urban and 4 regional) and 512 children were recruited. Compared to baseline, at 18 month follow-up, the total cohort achieved significant reductions in the mean BMIz score (1.7 v 1.0, p<0.001), median screen time (16.5 v 15.8 hours/week p=0.0414), median number of fast food meals per week (1.0 v 0.7, p<0.001) and significant increases in physical activity (6.0 v 10.0 hours/week, p<0.001) and self-esteem score (20.7 v 22.0, p<0.002). There were no significant differences between the control and intervention groups at any follow-up time-points. There were significantly more participants in the intervention than control group who completed 10 sessions of the weight management program (23% v 13%, p=0.015).\nConclusions: The incentive scheme, delivered in addition to the standard program, did not have a significant impact on health outcomes in overweight children. However, the intervention increased program attendance and overall cohort achieved sustained improvements in clinical and lifestyle outcomes.","PeriodicalId":73168,"journal":{"name":"Global journal of obesity, diabetes and metabolic syndrome","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal of obesity, diabetes and metabolic syndrome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33805/2638-812X.109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of childhood overweight and obesity is becoming an increasing concern worldwide. This study aimed to determine effectiveness of a structured goal setting incentive scheme, delivered within a community program, on health outcomes in overweight children at 6 and 18 months. Methods: Single-blind, cluster randomized controlled trial with 10 weeks, 6 month and 18 month follow-up. Community weight-loss programs for children were randomized to (i) standard program plus incentive scheme (intervention) or (ii) standard program alone (control). Primary outcome was mean BMIz score at 18 months. Secondary outcomes included anthropometric and behavioural measures. Results: A total of 37 sites (33 urban and 4 regional) and 512 children were recruited. Compared to baseline, at 18 month follow-up, the total cohort achieved significant reductions in the mean BMIz score (1.7 v 1.0, p<0.001), median screen time (16.5 v 15.8 hours/week p=0.0414), median number of fast food meals per week (1.0 v 0.7, p<0.001) and significant increases in physical activity (6.0 v 10.0 hours/week, p<0.001) and self-esteem score (20.7 v 22.0, p<0.002). There were no significant differences between the control and intervention groups at any follow-up time-points. There were significantly more participants in the intervention than control group who completed 10 sessions of the weight management program (23% v 13%, p=0.015). Conclusions: The incentive scheme, delivered in addition to the standard program, did not have a significant impact on health outcomes in overweight children. However, the intervention increased program attendance and overall cohort achieved sustained improvements in clinical and lifestyle outcomes.
与超重儿童目标实现相关的行为激励方案的有效性:一项随机对照试验
背景:儿童超重和肥胖的患病率在世界范围内日益受到关注。本研究旨在确定在社区项目中提供的结构化目标设定激励方案对6个月和18个月超重儿童健康结果的有效性。方法:单盲、整群随机对照试验,随访10周、6个月、18个月。社区儿童减肥计划被随机分为(1)标准计划加激励计划(干预)或(2)单独标准计划(对照)。主要终点是18个月时的平均BMIz评分。次要结果包括人体测量和行为测量。结果:共招募了37个站点(33个城市站点,4个区域站点),512名儿童。与基线相比,在18个月的随访中,整个队列的平均bmi评分(1.7 v 1.0, p<0.001)、中位数屏幕时间(16.5 v 15.8小时/周p=0.0414)、中位数每周快餐次数(1.0 v 0.7, p<0.001)显著降低,体力活动(6.0 v 10.0小时/周,p<0.001)和自尊评分(20.7 v 22.0, p<0.002)显著增加。在任何随访时间点,对照组和干预组之间没有显著差异。干预组的参与者明显多于完成10次体重管理计划的对照组(23% vs 13%, p=0.015)。结论:在标准方案之外提供的激励方案对超重儿童的健康结果没有显著影响。然而,干预增加了项目出勤率,整个队列在临床和生活方式方面取得了持续的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信