Comparison of full-mouth and partial-mouth disinfection modalities in nonsurgical periodontal treatment for periodontitis: a randomized clinical trial in vietnam

Duong Nguyen Thi Thuy, Uyen Tran Thi To
{"title":"Comparison of full-mouth and partial-mouth disinfection modalities in nonsurgical periodontal treatment for periodontitis: a randomized clinical trial in vietnam","authors":"Duong Nguyen Thi Thuy, Uyen Tran Thi To","doi":"10.34071/jmp.2023.4.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Periodontitis is the most common form of periodontal disease, greatly affecting the aesthetics, function as well as patient’s quality of life. In the periodontal disease treatment strategy, nonsurgical treatment is considered as the initial phase for anti-infection and soft-tissue management.\n\nObjective: This study aims to compare the effect of two nonsurgical periodontal modalities: one-stage full-mouth and partial-mouth protocols for periodontitis. Materials and Methods: 60 patients with chronic periodontitis were randomly allocated to 2 groups. Group I (n = 30) was treated according to partial-mouth therapy. Group II (n = 30) was treated according to full-mouth disinfection therapy. Periodontal parameters were assessed at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months, including plaque index, gingival index, periodontal probing depth, clinical attachment loss, and bleeding on probing.\n\nResults: Both two treatment modalities resulted in significant improvements in all clinical parameters over the entire duration of the study (p < 0.05). Full-mouth disinfection therapy showed significantly better improvements than the partial-mouth one during follow-up times (p < 0.05).\n\nConclusion: Nonsurgical periodontal treatment has positive effects on controlling periodontitis. Full-mouth therapy shows clinical benefits over partial-mouth therapy in improving periodontal conditions.\n\nKey words: Periodontitis, nonsurgical periodontal therapy, full-mouth therapy, partial-mouth therapy.","PeriodicalId":86274,"journal":{"name":"The South Dakota journal of medicine and pharmacy","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The South Dakota journal of medicine and pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34071/jmp.2023.4.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Periodontitis is the most common form of periodontal disease, greatly affecting the aesthetics, function as well as patient’s quality of life. In the periodontal disease treatment strategy, nonsurgical treatment is considered as the initial phase for anti-infection and soft-tissue management. Objective: This study aims to compare the effect of two nonsurgical periodontal modalities: one-stage full-mouth and partial-mouth protocols for periodontitis. Materials and Methods: 60 patients with chronic periodontitis were randomly allocated to 2 groups. Group I (n = 30) was treated according to partial-mouth therapy. Group II (n = 30) was treated according to full-mouth disinfection therapy. Periodontal parameters were assessed at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months, including plaque index, gingival index, periodontal probing depth, clinical attachment loss, and bleeding on probing. Results: Both two treatment modalities resulted in significant improvements in all clinical parameters over the entire duration of the study (p < 0.05). Full-mouth disinfection therapy showed significantly better improvements than the partial-mouth one during follow-up times (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Nonsurgical periodontal treatment has positive effects on controlling periodontitis. Full-mouth therapy shows clinical benefits over partial-mouth therapy in improving periodontal conditions. Key words: Periodontitis, nonsurgical periodontal therapy, full-mouth therapy, partial-mouth therapy.
在越南进行的一项随机临床试验:牙周炎非手术牙周治疗中全口和部分口消毒方式的比较
背景:牙周炎是最常见的牙周病,严重影响患者的美观、功能和生活质量。在牙周病治疗策略中,非手术治疗被认为是抗感染和软组织管理的初始阶段。目的:本研究旨在比较两种非手术牙周治疗方式:一期全口和部分口治疗牙周炎的效果。材料与方法:将60例慢性牙周炎患者随机分为两组。第一组(30例)采用部分口腔治疗。第二组30例采用全口消毒治疗。在基线和1、3和6个月时评估牙周参数,包括菌斑指数、牙龈指数、牙周探诊深度、临床附着丧失和探诊时出血。结果:两种治疗方式在整个研究期间的所有临床参数均有显著改善(p < 0.05)。随访期间,全口消毒治疗明显优于部分口消毒治疗(p < 0.05)。结论:非手术牙周治疗对控制牙周炎有积极作用。在改善牙周状况方面,全口治疗比部分口治疗有临床益处。关键词:牙周炎,非手术牙周治疗,全口治疗,部分口治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信