Physicochemical and structural properties of beef meat thawed using various methods

S. Lakehal, A. Lakehal, Salima Lakehal, O. Bennoune, A. Ayachi
{"title":"Physicochemical and structural properties of beef meat thawed using various methods","authors":"S. Lakehal, A. Lakehal, Salima Lakehal, O. Bennoune, A. Ayachi","doi":"10.52973/rcfcv-e33242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Four meat thawing techniques that are most commonly used in daily life were used: refrigerator thawing, microwave thawing, ambient temperature thawing, and water thawing, to evaluate the physico-chemical and histological alterations in thawed beef. After thawing, the structural, chemical, and physical characteristics of beef meat were evaluated. The results showed that meat thawed in the refrigerator at 4°C was characterized by the highest pH value (5.65 ± 0.02) and a significant difference (P<0.05) compared to meat thawed by other thawing methods. Also for the electrical conductivity, it reached the highest value (1.442 ± 1,012) in the microwave oven (P<0.05); meanwhile, water activity decreased significantly after thawing regardless of the thawing method (P<0.05). On the other hand, refrigerator thawing resulted in the least amount of water loss (1.23%) with P<0.05, while high levels of microwave energy caused significant water loss, represented by thawing loss and cooking loss (4.37% and 44.47%), respectively, with P<0.05. Among different thawing methods, microwave thawing had the highest level of TBARS, with a mean of 0.25 ± 0.034 mg·kg-1 (P<0.05). Regarding the color, the lightness (L*) value in the microwave-thawed samples decreased significantly (P<0.05) compared to the fresh control. Histologically, samples that were thawed in a refrigerator preserved the integrity of the fibers' structure after thawing better than other methods; samples thawed in a microwave, however, caused more structural damage. To ensure that it thaws uniformly and to retain the meat's quality as close to its fresh quality as possible, it is typically advised to thaw meat in a slower, more gradual manner, such as in the refrigerator.","PeriodicalId":32316,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Economicas","volume":"110 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Economicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52973/rcfcv-e33242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Four meat thawing techniques that are most commonly used in daily life were used: refrigerator thawing, microwave thawing, ambient temperature thawing, and water thawing, to evaluate the physico-chemical and histological alterations in thawed beef. After thawing, the structural, chemical, and physical characteristics of beef meat were evaluated. The results showed that meat thawed in the refrigerator at 4°C was characterized by the highest pH value (5.65 ± 0.02) and a significant difference (P<0.05) compared to meat thawed by other thawing methods. Also for the electrical conductivity, it reached the highest value (1.442 ± 1,012) in the microwave oven (P<0.05); meanwhile, water activity decreased significantly after thawing regardless of the thawing method (P<0.05). On the other hand, refrigerator thawing resulted in the least amount of water loss (1.23%) with P<0.05, while high levels of microwave energy caused significant water loss, represented by thawing loss and cooking loss (4.37% and 44.47%), respectively, with P<0.05. Among different thawing methods, microwave thawing had the highest level of TBARS, with a mean of 0.25 ± 0.034 mg·kg-1 (P<0.05). Regarding the color, the lightness (L*) value in the microwave-thawed samples decreased significantly (P<0.05) compared to the fresh control. Histologically, samples that were thawed in a refrigerator preserved the integrity of the fibers' structure after thawing better than other methods; samples thawed in a microwave, however, caused more structural damage. To ensure that it thaws uniformly and to retain the meat's quality as close to its fresh quality as possible, it is typically advised to thaw meat in a slower, more gradual manner, such as in the refrigerator.
用不同方法解冻牛肉的理化和结构特性
采用日常生活中最常用的四种肉类解冻技术:冰箱解冻、微波解冻、常温解冻和水解冻,评价解冻牛肉的理化和组织学变化。解冻后,对牛肉的结构、化学和物理特性进行了评价。结果表明,4°C冰箱解冻的肉类pH值最高(5.65±0.02),与其他解冻方法相比差异显著(P<0.05)。电导率在微波炉中最高(1.442±1012)(P<0.05);无论何种解冻方式,解冻后水分活度均显著降低(P<0.05)。另一方面,冰箱解冻的水分损失量最小(1.23%),P<0.05,而高微波能量导致的水分损失量显著,以解冻损失量和蒸煮损失量分别为4.37%和44.47%,P<0.05。不同解冻方式中,微波解冻法TBARS含量最高,平均值为0.25±0.034 mg·kg-1 (P<0.05)。在颜色方面,微波解冻样品的亮度(L*)值与新鲜对照相比显著降低(P<0.05)。组织学上,在冰箱中解冻的样品比其他方法更好地保存了解冻后纤维结构的完整性;然而,在微波炉中解冻的样品造成了更多的结构破坏。为了确保解冻均匀,并保持肉的品质尽可能接近其新鲜品质,通常建议以更慢,更渐进的方式解冻肉,例如在冰箱中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信