A Perspective on Critical Security Concept and International Migration Nexus through Copenhagen School: The Quest for Societal Security

Atahan Demirkol
{"title":"A Perspective on Critical Security Concept and International Migration Nexus through Copenhagen School: The Quest for Societal Security","authors":"Atahan Demirkol","doi":"10.47478/lectio.1146768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study dwells on the quest for a critical security perspective on international migration. Therefore, how international migration could be perceived through critical security studies is the main research question of this study. Critical Security Studies (CSS) or Welsh School of security studies emerged after Robert Cox’s debate between problem-solving and critical theories, especially after the 1990s. In this respect, CSS focus on questioning the mainstream theories and their interpretation of security. Instead of accepting the state as the referent object, critical security studies provide other elements that may be threatened, so that related to the security. On the one hand, CSS is, therefore, critical against the traditional approaches to security as realism and liberalism. Securitization, on the other hand, as Copenhagen School provided a speech act to put an issue into the field of security. International migration is one of the accurate examples of securitization. In this study, we employed CSS and securitization perspectives to international migration to understand how international migration could be assessed through critical theories.","PeriodicalId":32852,"journal":{"name":"Lectio Socialis","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lectio Socialis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47478/lectio.1146768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study dwells on the quest for a critical security perspective on international migration. Therefore, how international migration could be perceived through critical security studies is the main research question of this study. Critical Security Studies (CSS) or Welsh School of security studies emerged after Robert Cox’s debate between problem-solving and critical theories, especially after the 1990s. In this respect, CSS focus on questioning the mainstream theories and their interpretation of security. Instead of accepting the state as the referent object, critical security studies provide other elements that may be threatened, so that related to the security. On the one hand, CSS is, therefore, critical against the traditional approaches to security as realism and liberalism. Securitization, on the other hand, as Copenhagen School provided a speech act to put an issue into the field of security. International migration is one of the accurate examples of securitization. In this study, we employed CSS and securitization perspectives to international migration to understand how international migration could be assessed through critical theories.
从哥本哈根学派看关键安全概念和国际移民关系:对社会安全的追求
这项研究着重于寻求对国际移民的关键安全观点。因此,如何通过关键的安全研究来感知国际移民是本研究的主要研究问题。关键安全研究(Critical Security Studies, CSS)或威尔士安全研究学派是在罗伯特·考克斯(Robert Cox)对问题解决与批判理论的争论之后兴起的,尤其是在20世纪90年代之后。在这方面,CSS侧重于质疑主流理论及其对安全的解释。批判性安全研究不是接受状态作为参照对象,而是提供其他可能受到威胁的要素,从而与安全相关。一方面,CSS是,因此,对传统的安全方法作为现实主义和自由主义的批判。另一方面,证券化作为哥本哈根学派提供了一种将问题带入安全领域的言语行为。国际移民是证券化的一个准确例子。在本研究中,我们采用CSS和证券化的视角来研究国际移民,以了解如何通过批判理论来评估国际移民。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信