The Use of Medication for Challenging Behaviors in People with Intellectual Disabilities: Reflections and Evolving Challenges from a Taiwanese Psychiatrist

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Lien-Chung Wei
{"title":"The Use of Medication for Challenging Behaviors in People with Intellectual Disabilities: Reflections and Evolving Challenges from a Taiwanese Psychiatrist","authors":"Lien-Chung Wei","doi":"10.1080/19315864.2023.2223543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dear Editor, I recently read with great interest the article, “The Use of Medication for Challenging Behaviors in People with Intellectual Disabilities: The Direct Care Providers’ Perspective” (Deb et al., 2023). As a psychiatrist based in Taiwan, I am responsible for a medical team that cares for 66 acute psychiatric patients, some of whom have intellectual disabilities. I would like to commend the authors for their insightful work and share some reflections on the challenges I face in clinical practice, including recent developments concerning attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In my 20 years of experience as a psychiatrist, I have often hesitated to prescribe medication for challenging behaviors in individuals with intellectual disabilities. Many of these patients exhibit behavioral issues rather than psychiatric symptoms, such as hallucinations or delusions. Consequently, the use of medication is sometimes considered a form of chemical restraint, a notion that Deb et al. (2023) also highlight. Deciding on the appropriate type and dosage of medication has always been a critical consideration for me. I typically prescribe haloperidol, a traditional antipsychotic medication, and benzodiazepines for their sedative effects. Although haloperidol is known to cause extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), I have found it to be relatively safe throughout my years of clinical practice, leading me to prefer traditional medications. Deb et al. (2023) emphasize the need for a holistic approach and greater information on medications, their indications, and side effects. They also highlight the importance of involving individuals with intellectual disabilities and their families in shared decision-making. These findings prompt me to reevaluate my approach to managing challenging behaviors in people with intellectual disabilities, striving to better inform myself and collaborate with care providers, families, and the individuals themselves. In recent years, public awareness of ADHD has increased in Taiwan. Family members and educators of individuals with intellectual disabilities now sometimes express concerns about inattention and request ADHD medications, such as methylphenidate. This emerging issue was not as prevalent 20 years ago when I began my career as a psychiatrist. Deciding whether to prescribe these medications and determining which ones are most suitable presents a serious challenge for clinicians like myself. JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES 2023, VOL. 16, NO. 3, 275–276 https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2023.2223543","PeriodicalId":45864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"340 1","pages":"275 - 276"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2023.2223543","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dear Editor, I recently read with great interest the article, “The Use of Medication for Challenging Behaviors in People with Intellectual Disabilities: The Direct Care Providers’ Perspective” (Deb et al., 2023). As a psychiatrist based in Taiwan, I am responsible for a medical team that cares for 66 acute psychiatric patients, some of whom have intellectual disabilities. I would like to commend the authors for their insightful work and share some reflections on the challenges I face in clinical practice, including recent developments concerning attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). In my 20 years of experience as a psychiatrist, I have often hesitated to prescribe medication for challenging behaviors in individuals with intellectual disabilities. Many of these patients exhibit behavioral issues rather than psychiatric symptoms, such as hallucinations or delusions. Consequently, the use of medication is sometimes considered a form of chemical restraint, a notion that Deb et al. (2023) also highlight. Deciding on the appropriate type and dosage of medication has always been a critical consideration for me. I typically prescribe haloperidol, a traditional antipsychotic medication, and benzodiazepines for their sedative effects. Although haloperidol is known to cause extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS), I have found it to be relatively safe throughout my years of clinical practice, leading me to prefer traditional medications. Deb et al. (2023) emphasize the need for a holistic approach and greater information on medications, their indications, and side effects. They also highlight the importance of involving individuals with intellectual disabilities and their families in shared decision-making. These findings prompt me to reevaluate my approach to managing challenging behaviors in people with intellectual disabilities, striving to better inform myself and collaborate with care providers, families, and the individuals themselves. In recent years, public awareness of ADHD has increased in Taiwan. Family members and educators of individuals with intellectual disabilities now sometimes express concerns about inattention and request ADHD medications, such as methylphenidate. This emerging issue was not as prevalent 20 years ago when I began my career as a psychiatrist. Deciding whether to prescribe these medications and determining which ones are most suitable presents a serious challenge for clinicians like myself. JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES 2023, VOL. 16, NO. 3, 275–276 https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2023.2223543
智障人士使用药物治疗挑战行为:台湾精神科医师之反思与演变挑战
亲爱的编辑,我最近怀着极大的兴趣读了一篇文章,“使用药物治疗智障人士的挑战行为:直接护理提供者的观点”(Deb et al., 2023)。作为台湾的精神科医生,我负责一个医疗团队,照顾66名急性精神病患者,其中一些人有智力障碍。我想赞扬作者们富有洞察力的工作,并分享一些我在临床实践中面临的挑战,包括最近关于注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的发展。在我20年的精神科医生经验中,我经常犹豫是否要为智障人士的挑战性行为开药。许多患者表现出行为问题,而不是精神症状,如幻觉或妄想。因此,药物的使用有时被认为是一种化学约束,Deb等人(2023)也强调了这一观点。决定合适的药物类型和剂量对我来说一直是一个关键的考虑因素。我通常会开氟哌啶醇,一种传统的抗精神病药物,以及苯二氮卓类药物,因为它们有镇静作用。虽然已知氟哌啶醇会引起锥体外系症状(EPS),但在我多年的临床实践中,我发现它相对安全,这使我更喜欢传统药物。Deb等人(2023)强调需要全面的方法和更多关于药物、其适应症和副作用的信息。他们还强调了让智障人士及其家庭参与共同决策的重要性。这些发现促使我重新评估我管理智障人士具有挑战性行为的方法,努力更好地了解自己,并与护理人员、家庭和个人自己合作。近年来,台湾公众对ADHD的认识有所提高。智障人士的家庭成员和教育工作者现在有时会表达对注意力不集中的担忧,并要求服用多动症药物,如哌醋甲酯。20年前,当我开始自己的精神科医生生涯时,这个新出现的问题还没有那么普遍。对于像我这样的临床医生来说,决定是否开这些药,以及确定哪种药最合适,是一个严峻的挑战。《智障心理健康研究杂志》2023年第16卷第16期。3,275 - 276 https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2023.2223543
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信