Towards legal regulation of artificial intelligence

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW
Moises Barrio Andres
{"title":"Towards legal regulation of artificial intelligence","authors":"Moises Barrio Andres","doi":"10.35487/rius.v15i48.2021.661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses the current state of AI regulation and discusses the feasibility and need for regulation through legally binding instruments, beyond the field of ethics. History shows what can happen if the State withdraws and allows private companies to set their own exclusive regulatory standards. We have a unique opportunity to create laws and principles governing AI on a common basis and with an indispensable public-private partnership that should preferably be international in scope with the leadership of the UN or, failing that, at European level led by EU institutions, as they had already achieved in the areas of privacy and data protection.","PeriodicalId":40171,"journal":{"name":"Ius Humani-Revista de Derecho","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ius Humani-Revista de Derecho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35487/rius.v15i48.2021.661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper addresses the current state of AI regulation and discusses the feasibility and need for regulation through legally binding instruments, beyond the field of ethics. History shows what can happen if the State withdraws and allows private companies to set their own exclusive regulatory standards. We have a unique opportunity to create laws and principles governing AI on a common basis and with an indispensable public-private partnership that should preferably be international in scope with the leadership of the UN or, failing that, at European level led by EU institutions, as they had already achieved in the areas of privacy and data protection.
走向对人工智能的法律规制
本文讨论了人工智能监管的现状,并讨论了通过具有法律约束力的文书进行监管的可行性和必要性,超出了伦理领域。历史表明,如果国家退出并允许私营公司制定自己的专属监管标准,将会发生什么。我们有一个独特的机会,在共同的基础上,通过不可或缺的公私伙伴关系,制定管理人工智能的法律和原则,这种伙伴关系最好是在联合国的领导下,在国际范围内,或者,如果做不到这一点,在欧盟机构的领导下,在欧洲层面上,就像他们在隐私和数据保护领域已经实现的那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信