Ethical considerations in social media analytics in the context of migration: lessons learned from a Horizon 2020 project

IF 2.1 Q2 ETHICS
Jamie Mahoney, Kahina Le Louvier, S. Lawson, Diotima Bertel, E. Ambrosetti
{"title":"Ethical considerations in social media analytics in the context of migration: lessons learned from a Horizon 2020 project","authors":"Jamie Mahoney, Kahina Le Louvier, S. Lawson, Diotima Bertel, E. Ambrosetti","doi":"10.1177/17470161221087542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ubiquitous use of social platforms across the globe makes them attractive options for investigating social phenomena including migration. However, the use of social media data raises several crucial ethical issues around the areas of informed consent, anonymity and profiling of individuals, which are particularly sensitive when looking at a population such as migrants, which is often considered as ‘vulnerable’. In this paper, we discuss how the opportunities and challenges related to social media research in the context of migration impact on the development of large-scale scientific projects. Building on the EU-funded research project PERCEPTIONS, we explore the concrete challenges experienced in such projects regarding profiling, informed consent, bias, data sharing and ethical approval procedures, as well as the strategies used to mitigate them. We draw from lessons learned in this project to discuss implications and recommendations to researchers, funders and university ethics review panels. This paper contributes to the growing discussion on the ethical challenges associated with big social data research projects on migration by highlighting concrete aspects stakeholders should be looking for and questioning when involved in such large-scale scientific projects where collaboration, data sharing and transformation and practicalities are of importance.","PeriodicalId":38096,"journal":{"name":"Research Ethics","volume":"59 1","pages":"226 - 240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161221087542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

The ubiquitous use of social platforms across the globe makes them attractive options for investigating social phenomena including migration. However, the use of social media data raises several crucial ethical issues around the areas of informed consent, anonymity and profiling of individuals, which are particularly sensitive when looking at a population such as migrants, which is often considered as ‘vulnerable’. In this paper, we discuss how the opportunities and challenges related to social media research in the context of migration impact on the development of large-scale scientific projects. Building on the EU-funded research project PERCEPTIONS, we explore the concrete challenges experienced in such projects regarding profiling, informed consent, bias, data sharing and ethical approval procedures, as well as the strategies used to mitigate them. We draw from lessons learned in this project to discuss implications and recommendations to researchers, funders and university ethics review panels. This paper contributes to the growing discussion on the ethical challenges associated with big social data research projects on migration by highlighting concrete aspects stakeholders should be looking for and questioning when involved in such large-scale scientific projects where collaboration, data sharing and transformation and practicalities are of importance.
移民背景下社交媒体分析中的伦理考虑:从地平线2020项目中吸取的经验教训
社交平台在全球范围内的普遍使用使其成为调查包括移民在内的社会现象的有吸引力的选择。然而,社交媒体数据的使用引发了几个关键的道德问题,涉及知情同意、匿名和个人画像等领域,这些问题在关注移民等通常被认为是“弱势群体”的人群时尤为敏感。在本文中,我们讨论了移民背景下与社交媒体研究相关的机遇和挑战如何影响大型科学项目的发展。在欧盟资助的研究项目PERCEPTIONS的基础上,我们探讨了这些项目在分析、知情同意、偏见、数据共享和伦理审批程序方面遇到的具体挑战,以及用于减轻这些挑战的策略。我们从这个项目中吸取教训,讨论对研究人员、资助者和大学伦理审查小组的影响和建议。本文通过强调利益相关者在参与此类大型科学项目时应该寻找和质疑的具体方面,为与移民大社会数据研究项目相关的伦理挑战的日益增长的讨论做出了贡献,其中协作,数据共享和转换以及实用性非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research Ethics
Research Ethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
17
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信