Yield enhancement in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) var. TMV 7 through weed management practices 

P. Elakkiyapriya, M. Meyyappan, P. Sudhakar, A. Angayarkanni
{"title":"Yield enhancement in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) var. TMV 7 through weed management practices ","authors":"P. Elakkiyapriya, M. Meyyappan, P. Sudhakar, A. Angayarkanni","doi":"10.31830/2454-1761.2022.cr-880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A field experiment was conducted during summer season of 2021 with a view to find out a suitable weed management practice for sesamum by excluding commonly used herbicides and including botanical herbicides along with hand weeding. The experiment was conducted in randomized block design with 10 treatments and was replicated thrice. The treatments included one pre-emergence herbicide metribuzin at two levels, one early post- emergence herbicide imazethapyr and one post-emergence herbicide quizalofop ethyl and were applied individually and in sequence along with HW. Two plant products Ageratum conizoides and Ocimum sanctum were tried each at two levels along with HW. These treatments were compared with twice HW and unweeded control. Among the treatments, the least weed density (9.92, 9.88), weed DMP (4.96, 13.54 g/m2), highest grain yield (684 kg/ha) and stalk yield (2069 kg/ha) were recorded in pre-emergence application of metribuzin @ 100 g a.i./ha on 3 DAS+Early post-emergence application of imazethapyr @ 30 g a.i./ha on 10 DAS+HW on 20 DAS. Further, this treatment gave the highest BCR of 2.46. Treatments involving herbicides fb HW were better than plant products fb HW treatments in terms of weed density and yield.\n","PeriodicalId":10786,"journal":{"name":"Crop research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop research","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31830/2454-1761.2022.cr-880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during summer season of 2021 with a view to find out a suitable weed management practice for sesamum by excluding commonly used herbicides and including botanical herbicides along with hand weeding. The experiment was conducted in randomized block design with 10 treatments and was replicated thrice. The treatments included one pre-emergence herbicide metribuzin at two levels, one early post- emergence herbicide imazethapyr and one post-emergence herbicide quizalofop ethyl and were applied individually and in sequence along with HW. Two plant products Ageratum conizoides and Ocimum sanctum were tried each at two levels along with HW. These treatments were compared with twice HW and unweeded control. Among the treatments, the least weed density (9.92, 9.88), weed DMP (4.96, 13.54 g/m2), highest grain yield (684 kg/ha) and stalk yield (2069 kg/ha) were recorded in pre-emergence application of metribuzin @ 100 g a.i./ha on 3 DAS+Early post-emergence application of imazethapyr @ 30 g a.i./ha on 10 DAS+HW on 20 DAS. Further, this treatment gave the highest BCR of 2.46. Treatments involving herbicides fb HW were better than plant products fb HW treatments in terms of weed density and yield.
通过杂草管理措施提高芝麻(Sesamum indicum L.) var. TMV 7产量
在2021年夏季进行了田间试验,通过排除常用除草剂,采用植物除草剂和人工除草,找出适合芝麻杂草管理的做法。试验采用随机区组设计,共10个处理,重复3次。苗期前除草剂甲曲霉嗪、苗期后除草剂吡唑乙酯和苗期后除草剂吡曲霉乙酯分别为2个水平,按不同剂量和不同顺序施用。两种植物产品荆刺和荆刺随HW分别在两个水平上进行试验。这些处理与两次高施和未除草对照进行了比较。拔苗期前施用100 g a.i./ha 3个DAS+拔苗期早期施用30 g a.i./ha 10个DAS+HW 20个DAS的处理,杂草密度最低(9.92、9.88),杂草DMP分别为4.96、13.54 g/ha,籽粒产量最高(684 kg/ha),茎秆产量最高(2069 kg/ha)。该处理的BCR最高,为2.46。在杂草密度和产量方面,除草剂和除草剂处理均优于植物产品和除草剂处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信